Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It would depend if you're referring to two separate servings of the dish, in which case you'd ask the the waiter for "two-toad-in-the-holes, please," but if one was referring to the number of sausages one wanted in the dish one might ask for, for example, "Four toads in the hole please."


God I need to get out more.

No UG, done well it's a delight. But I must admit, it weights heavy on my belly when I do eat it. The batter needs to be lighter than light to succeed, else it's like a greasy sausage and onion on a bed of neoprene.


But boiled bacon and peas pudding is a good dish, as are eels themselves. But jellied is not my thing, I prefer cured and smoked like salmon. Or grilled, with a thick slice of smoked back and some mash potatoes. However, any dish in the wrong hands can be a disaster.


Ahhh...food glorious food!

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does it really matter?


Not in the slightest, but just as some of us like discussing the merits of 4-4-2 vs 5-4-1, some of us like discussing the nuances of language - just a bit of fun, as long as one's not judgemental about it.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Like sheep. And Pokemon :)

>

> Why is sheep lamb when you eat it? And why is cow

> beef?


I know this one...it's because of the split between the Anglo-Saxon peasantry and the Norman aristocracy, so when the animal was alive it was referred to by its Anglo-Saxon name as it was they who looked after them, so cow and sheep, but when it was killed it was the Normans who got to eat it, so as prepared meat it was given its French name - bouef, mouton, and the distinction remained as the two languages merged into modern English.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'Toad in the holes'. The collective noun is a

> bellywobbler of toad in the holes


I would have thought 'toads in the hole', in the same way we pluralise to governors general, poets laureate and mothers in law.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would have thought 'toads in the hole', in the

> same way we pluralise to governors general, poets

> laureate and mothers in law.


Not really the same though, is it? 'toads in the hole' seems to indicate multiple toads within a single hole, it is not really analogous to "mothers-in-law".


Conversely, "toad in the holes" suggests a single toad which has been split amongst several holes. Far from ideal.


I would suggest "toads in holes", or perhaps simply abbreviating it to "toads" if the context will allow.

Context is everything. Does it need to be pluralised in it's common everyday usage?

If at home, whether it's for one person or a large family, you'd say ''We're having/I'm cooking Toad in the Hole tonight.

Likewise in a restaurant, you would order 'Toad in the Hole in the singular.

If someone then asked you what you had to eat last night at the restaurant, you'd reply ''We both had Toad in the Hole'', again in the singular.

I think it's assumed there is no satisfactory plural so we construct our sentences around the singular...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was normal cyclists, in rush hour traffic, in the dark, in the rain. Just really want people to realise it’s that time of year even more careful and to get kitted out.
    • The other consideration is that users of Lime bikes and similar, plus younger pedal cyclists, probably don't view themselves as 'cyclists' as such and so don't get kitted out or even consider that they need to. I also agree that earlier nights are another factor for the casual or hire bike user more used to cycling in the summer. I don't think I have ever seen a hire bike or scooter user wearing a helmet or reflective gear- presumably that is because the bike is just viewed as a transport tool for short term use and users do not want to be encumbered by any of the safety gear? Before anyone jumps on me for anecdotal evidence and speculation, this is just what I have seen round here, there may be hordes of similar users elsewhere that are kitted out.
    • Well apolitical if that is an OK word for you.  Sorry if my choice of words was incorrect.  But on my original point if it wasn't for the Telegraph dragging this up, and yes they do have an agenda, an no they are not apolitical/impartial whatever, we;d be none the wiser. But as it made no difference to Trump's election campaign that why would he have a case in the American courts? Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of the programme
    • If she took a bus, has she tried contacting the bus company? Long shot, but you never know!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...