Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm having a dilemma over which one to choose. I loved them both. Both had a great atmosphere with lots of energy.

I like the C of E factor of St. John's and St. Clement's but reception seemed a bit freefall (although i'm sure that doesn't matter). Goose Green seemed very exciting with a real sense of direction. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Which are you most likely to get in to?


St Johns you wll have more chance if you qualify under the church attending criteria, though some places just go on distance (once nonreligious siblings have been acommodated)


GG will be "closest community school"

McE Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Likely to get into either. Goose green and heber

> are equally our closest schools


Really? I don't think that can actually be the case under the council's policy, i would double check which is your closest community school, officially, as you will only have a decent chance at that community school.

Hmm, like the other posters I wonder how aware you are of the tricky school situation in ED? If you live between Heber & Goose Green then you may fall into the ED 'deadzone' school wise and find you don't have a place at either because you're too far away from both. If that's the case you'll be offered a place at a school in North Peckham.


PLease check out exactly which one is your closest community school and how far you are from their door, then check how far away people were who got places last year to get a realistic idea of which school you should apply to. Good Luck.

find you don't have a place at either because you're too far away from both. If that's the case you'll be offered a place at a school in North Peckham.


Hello, I was wondering where people not close enough were sent. Why would it be N Peckham and not closer S Peckham, do you know? Thanks.

AFAIK its wherever they have a school with places to spare in Southwark, & I think all the south Peckham schools - like ED schools - are usually now full or oversubscribed. Every year is different mind, & I know that many ED schools now have bulge classes to try & compensate for Southwark Councils crap forward planning & social policy for ED, but as prdarling might testify, every year a few families in ED fall through the net and it's best not to assume anything with regard to school places. As someone said to assume your child is 'likely to get into either' of two schools is extremely naive in the current climate - more like "likely to get into neither".

Goose Green school is being provided a significant slab of the ?12M ear marked for resolving Primary School places to fund effectviely a complete remodelling of the ground floor - new kitchens, etc.

GG side of this is to support a bulge class.

So I think McE is being quite realistic in thinking they have a cgoice between GG and StJ&C.

If they're in GG catchment James. Every year is different & past history suggests that assuming a 'choice' in ED isn't realistic. However with GG and other schools having bulge classes you could be right - maybe this year things will be different. If I were applying for primaries now I couldn't be as confident as the OP though.
James- when you say GG is being given money to support a bulge class, does this mean for the sept 2011 intake (ie this years applications) or for coming years as would it not be a little early for them to bulge if just out of special measures putting additional pressure on an improving school?

My son is in Yr 3 at GG, progressing well and very happy, as are his parents. You're right, there is a great sense of direction, the staff are fabulous, led by a strong senior team and head of school who is often seen in the playground, talking to parents at start and end of day. From what I've heard from friends at other schools that is not standard, and I think it's great that she is so visible and accessible.


When we looked round St J& St C (though admittedly that's now a few years ago) we did not get to speak to any of their staff (apart from receptionists who put us in touch with a couple of very nice children who showed us round the school), not to mention the head teacher, whereas at GG the head teacher at the time showed us round the school and answered questions (and that tradition carries on).


Children at GG come from a wide range of cultural and religious backgrounds, all of which contribute to school live and play their part, but none is dominant (which suits us fine as believe children should have the freedom to make up their own mind).


If you can't decide, maybe you need to have another look round the schools - GG does tours on the first Monday of the month which coincide with PTA coffee mornings so you can speak to existing parents.


If you want to know anything specific, you're welcome to pm me.


Dagmar

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
    • Their comms has been diabolical. The "son of a toolmaker" and "working people" soundbites may have placated an electorate before an election but they will come back to haunt you after it and will bite you hard if things don't go well.  If they don't improve things soon it is going to be a long parliament for them and there are no signs things are getting better. Amazing as they had 14 years to prepare for this but being in opposition is far, far easier than running a country.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...