Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Beej Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sods law, after all the talk of the place this

> week I was planning to finally give it a try on

> Tuesday and again tonight, cest a vie.... good job

> I can never get enough of that weirdly trippy

> drippy hypnotic oil lamp thing in East Dulwich

> Tandoori.


That trippy drippy hypnotic oil lamp thing in Dulwich Tandoori Has been there for 20 years+ ??


It broke down but was repaired s couple of years back.


DulwichFox

bob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was told by another restaurant that they owned 3

> others and they all closed on the same day.

> Bob S


Draw your own conclusions. I've been told that this was a police raid, not an immigration raid. But of course Foxy & Louisa are quite correct that we should await any criminal charges before drawing any conclusions. And further comment on here could potentially be defamatory (apart from the Sue v Foxy v Louisa joust, which is both ongoing and enjoyable). Enough said.

derwentgrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


(apart from

> the Sue v Foxy v Louisa joust, which is both

> ongoing and enjoyable).



It isn't ongoing.


I just wanted an answer, and I got it, so as far as I'm concerned that is the end of it.


I just don't understand why it wasn't forthcoming earlier, as it seemed a quite straightforward explanation.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> derwentgrove Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> (apart from

> > the Sue v Foxy v Louisa joust, which is both

> > ongoing and enjoyable).

>

>

> It isn't ongoing.

>

> I just wanted an answer, and I got it, so as far

> as I'm concerned that is the end of it.

>

> I just don't understand why it wasn't forthcoming

> earlier, as it seemed a quite straightforward

> explanation.


Sue nothing is straightforward on here, you should know that by now ;-)


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Sue nothing is straightforward on here, you should

> know that by now ;-)

>



Well I am straightforward, so I presume you are speaking for yourself?


ETA: And perhaps for Dulwich Fox if you are implying that his explanation wasn't in fact all that it seemed?


Oh well, I always was very gullible :(

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Sue nothing is straightforward on here, you

> should

> > know that by now ;-)

> >

>

>

> Well I am straightforward, so I presume you are

> speaking for yourself?



I am very straightforward too. It's often my downfall. You know as well as I do, Foxy sometimes goes off on a tangent, innocently and never offensively, and yet you goad him for answers when it isn't necessarily needed. That's my conclusion, but anyway let's drop it now.


Louisa.

ozzy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A guy from there told me they were re-opening on

> march 16th selling indian food .


Thank god; we've needed a decent Indian on LL for ages. All we need now is a pizza place, cheese shop and some banners on lampposts and we're set.

> Ianr yes I was told the same.


Bob, I was quoting you and simply asking: which of A or B?


Anyway, for anyone inclined to fact-check the rumour of simultaneous closures ... The sole director/owner of Xoco Ltd of 44LL, incorporated March 2016, has the same name and birth month as the person who took over Chutney Jane Ltd of London SE, another restaurant business, in September 2015. So possibly the same person. I've seen no evidence of any other catering directorships in his name.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are 4.7 billion people living on Earth.

> Only 5 or 6 people have expressed any concern

> About this place closing.

>

> Foxy


What happened


There were 7 Billion yesterday


Was it Trump

Hmmmm....

Foxy. A couple of days ago you hauled someone up for casually mentioning '7 curry houses' on Lordship Lane, where you pointed out it was 5 - a discrepancy of 2. Yes two. One, two - two !

NOW you casually disregard 2 BILLION of the population with a stroke of the keyboard ?!

Your error was AT LEAST a billion times as bad, by magnitude. That's a propa error.

This simply can't go on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was in Forest Hill Road today, just past the Rye, and noticed there is a dentist next to the Herne (pub) that has NHS signs outside. I've never had any problems getting NHS dental treatment in East Dulwich, and I get regular check ups. I've been to three  different dental practices here over the years, all with NHS treatment. I think the difficulties are in other parts of the country. Malumbu has a good explanation above. I didn't hear the Radio 4 programme, but I'm guessing that a  radio programme is not going to have time to say where you CAN easily get NHS treatment, and is bound to focus on the negatives and the horror stories, otherwise it would be very boring! ETA: Re children's teeth, I think the major issue is not lack of dentists, it is children being given sugary food, drinks and confectionery which rots their teeth. The education of parents needs to be about this, not just about tooth brushing. And in some cases the poor diet may also be due to lack of money for healthy food. Though of course the lack of dentists doesn't help, if  the tooth rotting can't be rectified by fillings or extraction.
    • Well, I hope you like what you see, the hot air, lack of answers and continual blaming things on the last Government and the made up blackhole, I find are nauseating. The man needs to see reality, because I'd guess that if we had a snap election tomorrow and based on the first six months of this parliament, Labour would get trounced. When the election does finally happen and if that isn't before the people rise up and throw this lot out, Labour will not be voted back in for a millennium.  
    • Yes thanks that's exactly the choices I get.  I will block and if somehow they find a way back I'll report.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...