Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,


Just a quick one, just walked from from The Actress with my girlfriend, and between there and Underhill Road on Crystal Palace Road a guy in a balaclava and puffy jacket walking in our direction angle to collide with us as it were, reaching into his jacket. Stared him in the eyes the whole way to let him know I was ready to react if something happened, and he pulled away at the last second thankfully. In light of the previous post about violent muggings in the area, I'd say to keep your eyes peeled.


G

As an update, called the non emergency number to let them know, they got back in touch to say they've had a number of marked and unmarked cars in the area to try and find him, with no luck.


Heartening at least to have heard back with a response so fast!

nina_maniana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I didn't realise it was against any law to wear a

> balaclava.


I don't think it is - but I suppose it's a warning sign.


The OP noticed other things though (unlike me - who averted my eyes).

nina_maniana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I didn't realise it was against any law to wear a balaclava.


You don't consider it threatening - or at least suspicious - behaviour?


With an altitude of 30 metres, that stretch of Crystal Palace Road is an unlikely destination for winter sports.

I can appreciate it probably isn't against the law, but everything about the situation was wrong - altering his path to make contact with us, reaching into his pocket as he drew close, keeping his eyes on me.

Regardless, not exactly the most benign thing to greet you on a quiet road, even if it was innocent - which I wholeheartedly believe it wasn't.


G

Gtothe, you'd have been quite within your rights to clout the guy, based on your description of what happened.

This is how muggers get away with it so often - they know you won't raise a finger until after they've hit you and by then it may be too late or you're not in a position to fight back any more.

I genuinely that kind of intimidation should be an imprisonable offence.

Why should you have to wait until the last possible second when the guy approached you to find out whether or not he's going to wound you or your partner ?

Too right he deserved to be owned for that behaviour.

No reason to be walking around with a balaclava on. It's hardly a ski resort. Don't ever feel threatened by these people, never cross the road or act scared. Face them down, they'll think twice about approaching then. It makes me so mad to think people like this get away with this sort of threatening behaviour.


Louisa.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I genuinely that kind of intimidation should be an

> imprisonable offence.


It is actually, comes under threatening behaviour - behaviour which may cause a reasonable person to have a fear of violence, punishable by up to six months' imprisonment.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No reason to be walking around with a balaclava

> on. It's hardly a ski resort. Don't ever feel

> threatened by these people, never cross the road

> or act scared. Face them down, they'll think twice

> about approaching then. It makes me so mad to

> think people like this get away with this sort of

> threatening behaviour.

>

> Louisa.


Terrible advice and I hope no one would actually listen to it.

If it was a mugger and you put him off, well done


But I walk down the street occasionally wearing a balaclava, as I wear one under my motorcycle helmet. I don't always take it off before I get in, as my head gets the coldest when I've had a lid on


I know it looks odd, maybe a bit alarming. But I usually don't meet people on the street, only if I do I haven't yet figured what to say that won't freak people out, so I just go about my business.


If you have a moped, you often store the lid uner the seat, so don't carry the helmet. Which might be the case here, and the guy might have been putting keys into his pocket.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it was a mugger and you put him off, well done

>

> But I walk down the street occasionally wearing a

> balaclava, as I wear one under my motorcycle

> helmet. I don't always take it off before I get

> in, as my head gets the coldest when I've had a

> lid on

>

> I know it looks odd, maybe a bit alarming. But I

> usually don't meet people on the street, only if I

> do I haven't yet figured what to say that won't

> freak people out, so I just go about my business.

>

> If you have a moped, you often store the lid uner

> the seat, so don't carry the helmet. Which might

> be the case here, and the guy might have been

> putting keys into his pocket.


And I have a disconcerting habit of looking straight at

people sometimes - made worse by my eyesight - I know it

could all be coincidence.

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No reason to be walking around with a balaclava

> > on. It's hardly a ski resort. Don't ever feel

> > threatened by these people, never cross the

> road

> > or act scared. Face them down, they'll think

> twice

> > about approaching then. It makes me so mad to

> > think people like this get away with this sort

> of

> > threatening behaviour.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> Terrible advice and I hope no one would actually

> listen to it.



Rather than jump on the bandwagon with a totally unconstructive and condescending answer, how about suggesting what you would consider to be an appropriate form of action in such a situation? Just a thought.


Louisa.

I'm inclined to sgree with Seabag's suggestion, especially as more bikes have helmet storage now (when the actual fuel tank is under the seat, the big painted tank at the front is for shopping or lid).


Having said that, if you wander round in a balaclava, you can't complain if you frighten someone into giving you a pre-emptive thump. A mate of mine had a pair of very jumpy coppers turn up at his place, threatening him with their batons, as the neighbours had called when they spotted him out the front of his house in a balaclava at midnight. It was winter and he had just got home to find his bricks had been delivered, so he was moving them round the back in multiple trips. His neighbours had done the right thing, and no harm was done that a change of underpants couldn't fix.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SCSB79 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Louisa Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > No reason to be walking around with a

> balaclava

> > > on. It's hardly a ski resort. Don't ever feel

> > > threatened by these people, never cross the

> > road

> > > or act scared. Face them down, they'll think

> > twice

> > > about approaching then. It makes me so mad to

> > > think people like this get away with this

> sort

> > of

> > > threatening behaviour.

> > >

> > > Louisa.

> >

> > Terrible advice and I hope no one would

> actually

> > listen to it.

>

>

> Rather than jump on the bandwagon with a totally

> unconstructive and condescending answer, how about

> suggesting what you would consider to be an

> appropriate form of action in such a situation?

> Just a thought.

>

> Louisa.


I don't know, how about just avoid a possible menacing person... walk away, cross the road.

You are suggesting that people should "face down" someone who could potentially be violent.

Not sure why you'd suggest actions that could possibly ignite a situation that could turn nasty.


As I said, terrible advice.

May I suggest that people with 'staring eyes', who wear a balaclava whilst walking a few steps behind the only other person on a dimly lit street, with loud cuban healed shoes and carrying a cigarette lighter shaped like a gun in their hand, just consider how they might be making others uncomfortable.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No reason to be walking around with a baby in a pushchair.

> It's hardly a footpath for everyone. Don't ever feel

> threatened by these people, never cross the road

> or act scared. Face them down, they'll think twice

> about approaching then. It makes me so mad to

> think people like this get away with this sort of

> threatening behaviour.

>

> Louisa.

"You don't consider it threatening - or at least suspicious - behaviour?" <<


Not enough I'd call the police about it! Perhaps the person was cold. Perhaps they had a facial deformity or scarring or a regrettable facial tattoo they were embarassed about and wanted to hide. Perhaps they had an injury which was covered in bandages under the balaclava. Perhaps the person was a fundamentalist muslim who's burka was in the wash and she needed to cover her face to nip out to the shops.


Either way I don't think the good residents of East Dulwich need to be contemplating vigilante action any time soon :-)

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know, how about just avoid a possible

> menacing person... walk away, cross the road.

> You are suggesting that people should "face down"

> someone who could potentially be violent.

> Not sure why you'd suggest actions that could

> possibly ignite a situation that could turn

> nasty.

>

> As I said, terrible advice.


I would possibly try a friendly nod and smile and see

what came back.


Would be brave though - but a challenge doesn't have to be

a challenge as it were.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Chester is a large ginger and while cat with a fluffy tail. He went missing from Casino Avenue on April 8. We only recently adopted him from Battersea, so he may be a bit disorientated. Please check any sheds or garages in case he's got trapped - he's not the cleverest cat. If you spot him please contact 07905 209 508. He does have a microchip.
    • Hi. Have you managed to find any groups in the area? I'm also a woman with ADHD and looking for support/discussion ideally locally.
    • Went to the junction today to check the "scene of the event" to try and work out from the tyre marks on the road and the damage to the kerb, what were the contributing factors to the accident. Here are my observations and deductions. 1.Compaction type refuse collection trucks, such as these, are exceptionally "tail-heavy" due the the weight of the hydraulic compaction mechanism and the fact that this weight is positioned on the  rear overhang ie behind the rear wheels. 2. To compensate for the extra weight, the truck is fitted with a "tag axle". The tag axle is located  forward of the rearmost axle. When fully laden, all the rear tyres will be running at very close to their operating limit. 3. The tag axle has only 2 wheels as opposed to 4 wheels on the rearmost axle. So on either side at the rear, there a three wheels. So if one rear tyre on the near side has lost pressure,  the weight carried by the remaining two is increased by 50%. 4. Being tail-heavy with a high centre of gravity, the driver of such vehicles should be ultra cautious when cornering. 5. When turning to the right,  the weight imposed on near side tyres is further increased depending on the speed involved. 6. The two long curved tyre marks on the road  suggest that only two of the 3 tyres on the near side were taking the weight.  7 These curved tyre marks end abruptly and I'm trying to work out exactly why. This spot is  very close to where the  near side rear wheels  slide up against the kerb and the wheel rims gouge out chunks  of the kerb stones. There is a possibility that the driver braked late and so caused the tyres to loose all grip and so slide into the kerb. If there are any forensic traffic experts around, I would welcome their take on this.
    • I don't think there are stupid questions Sue.  There are informative questions, policy questions, normative questions.... You suggest to do a sort of survey! Interesting idea but not for me as I have other priorities and if I do not address these with NHS doctors I will go, once again, privately.  In any case as many people using this forum know, GP surgeries in England offer at present services that in most cases do not and cannot cover matters that are under the remit of secondary care - for instance rheumatologists clinics in hospitals. If the dismantlement of NHS England will bring possible positive changes also in primary care with more choices for people  I do not know but I would really hope so because at the moment lot of people with chronic rheumatic conditions  fall into the cracks  of he system, that means are not seen by NHS rheumatologists that have long queues and cannot be cured by GPs neither in most cases, even when (I am sure about this and I would like to know more) there are physicians and local GPs fully qualified and experts to do such jobs even if they are not rheumatologists!    Thank you for your time Sue and by the way  if you do any survey like the one you mentioned please let us know. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...