Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well, SMG, I feel it only proved my point.


I don't think this thread is anything about sexuality at all.


I think it's about a few people seeing how far they can push it before someone 'says' something.


When they get the reaction, they launch into a man-hating rant. First IV with some scarcely concealed misandry about climaxing, and then DJKQ tossing subtelty out of the window.


The goal wasn't self-expression, it was conflict. It's only fun, like the 'lesbian' thread, when it's being tested for *shock* value. As soon as it becomes humdrum the attention seekers will drop it like an old rag.

Whatever H....give it a break eh? You are like a broken record...and just no damn fun.


You are right the thread isn't about sexuality...it's about a 'rampant rabbit'. You are the only one turning it into yet another tiresome attempt to have a go at me. Typical arrogance from H...thinks he is the all knowing authority on why people post what they post, or start the threads they do.

I think DJKQ's cross because she believes that my disapproval of threads about masturbation aids is somehow a criticism of women or lesbians.


There's nothing I can say to change that.


The irony is that I only took the mickey out of attention seeking behaviour. On the other hand she started attacking men for being paedos and rapists.


She's been incredibly insulting and sexist, and in response she's merely been chastised for preening.

That pure fantasy on your part H......and now you are insulting me with your typical arrogance.


I really think you have a real issue with women having any kind of fun don't you H. Anyway hopefully someone H doesn't see fit to insult will return this thread back to the fun banter it was before Mr Misery stepped in.

:))


Watch this one...


Me: "I think DJKQ's cross because she believes that my disapproval of threads about masturbation aids is somehow a criticism of women"


DJKQ: "That pure fantasy on your part H......I really think you have a real issue with women"


Badaam, tish.


I kind of think my sexuality is my own buiness, thank you for your assumptions, but I have no intention of resolving them one way or the other in public.


I don't think sexuality is something that's undeserving of discussion, but I think it's such an intense private issue that it's best kept to more secluded environments. After all, I don't come on here talking about my favourite poo do I?


I don't actually think that vaginas are intrinsically funny - the only way they could be fun is through the giggly *shock* of breaking a social taboo.


Breaking that taboo doesn't have long time hilarity value, it's funny the first time, and then you have to find something to shock more. This conversation started with accessories, and then stooped to a rather uninspired reference to discharges. That kind of escalation is typical of *shock* tactics.

Oh please, this is a thread about an adult toy. That is all. Some posts may have been borderline what one would normally expect on a local community forum, and others outside some people's comfort zone (including myself), but what's with all the faux social commentary?


Whatever the historical precedent for patriarchy, there's every evidence that in the modern era women are overcompensating with a complete rejection of social decorum.


Let's assume for argument's sake that women are completely rejecting 'social decorum', where is the evidence that they are doing so to overcompensate? And overcompensate for what? Living in a patriarchal society? Well thanks Freud, but you're probably better off leaving your armchair psychology at home, no one is that envious of your pen.


I'm guessing this thread is here because of a social weakness.


I'm guessing you're here because of a social weakness. See where guessing gets us, H?


an insecurity with sexuality that means women need to keep stating it to complete strangers... "I have a vagina"


Oh there's that armchair psychology again. Tell us again why women do things, go on H, it's not partonising at all and you're doing incredibly well so far.


*normally places winky icon here, but other people's vehemence seem to have deprived me of the pleasure*


If you're referring to my earlier post, I'm not depriving you of anything. I simply reiterated an observation made by other forum members, namely that placing a winking or smiling icon at the end of an inflammatory/nasty comment does not make it seem any less so. If anything, it just makes the poster look smug. But in future don't let me or anyone else stop you. After all, you've nothing to lose. And don't you think that saying you would have posted the icon versus actually posting the icon amounts to the same thing anyway?

I think some women can be much ruder then men! Dirty mares some of you can be!

can make a builder blush!.

I think this is a great thread talking about a adult toy for ladies fun.

Would there be the same negative comments if a guy was asking about what type of

fleshlight to use?...google it!

stop slagging off djkiller queen its all fun!.

Captain Scarlet Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think some women can be much ruder then men!

> Dirty mares some of yoy can be!

> can make a builder blush!.


Haha, don't pretend to be coy CS, I've read your posts in the 'a joke' thread.

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Captain Scarlet Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think some women can be much ruder then men!

> > Dirty mares some of yoy can be!

> > can make a builder blush!.

>

> Haha, don't pretend to be coy CS, I've read your

> posts in the 'a joke' thread.


I am not pretending to be coy at all..in fact I am a dirty barstard myself I freely admit it

what I cannot stand is people who are up their own arse pretending that they have never heard a rude

joke in their life acting all shocked and offended!.

given that people on here are saying they're so confident about their this/that, some reactions suggest the opposite.

example - if you're confident about your religion you don't get shirty about it when people question or poke fun at it.

There will always be disrespecters.

There's been a few amateurish comments on here from, presumably, men (given the banality of the comments) - i think some men are genuinely threatened by the fact that women also have sexual needs (no way !!!), often exceeding yer average man's, and are ready to sort themselves out, in spite of/as well as having a partner already. sort of like it trash's the man's idea of being the all-vanquishing supercock (though never 'quite' achieving it). get real and grow up.

But really, who cares.


Basically 'people toss', big feckin deal.


is the 'rampant rabbit' oriented part of the thread truly over ? If so why not start another thread maybe called 'sexuality points to prove' because this one is surely off topic now.

Captain Scarlet Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am not pretending to be coy at all..in fact I am

> a dirty barstard myself I freely admit it


Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!


I haven't been offended by anything on this thread. I will admit to being a bit shocked though. Not at the content, but at the context more than anything else.

a thread about female masturbation and masturbation tools was always going to attract controversy.


If I started a thread about my wonderful squidgy mega-vag that comes in a can and is heated up in warm water and about how I have squirty orgasms (every time no less) I think there might be some pretty vocal opposition from both sexes.


I have enjoyed this thread though and haven't been offended at all.


:)

It was always intended to be nothing more than a bit of cheeky fun and I think most people have had fun with it.


But sadly for me, I have so many recommendations to choose from now that I am no closer to answering the question in my original post! :))

The individual sexuality of a person is indeed a private things should they want it to be (with obvious exceptions involving public life hypocrisy etc) but the sexuality of a entire gender is up for debate. One of the things I have noted about when women get together and discuss sex, is the level of confirmation and questioning involved, if layered with humour and sometime vulgarity. Women have to continously ask themselves am I normal because of the stereotypes that we are spoonfed on a daily basis and which is getting worse. Porn is much more mainstream now and hell that is a lot to live up to. Female nudity of a very specific type is everywhere - again its a lot to live up to. Women talk to normal women to reconfirm that their desires, their needs, their bodies are normal because film, magazines and some, not all men have a really skewed view.

felt-tip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> a thread about female masturbation and

> masturbation tools was always going to attract

> controversy.


Yeah! When do we get the 'Men - How do you like to masturbate" thread? Will it be considered too close to the bone? And how long before the admin pulls it?


Fnarr. :))

I don't like cricket. Don't see the point of it. Dull dull dull. So, here's the thing; I don't go on the cricket thread. Never ever. Why would I?


In that vein, I suggest that anyone who finds anything offensive about this thread doesn't come here. Sex toys for women, female orgasm; out of some people's comfort zones. So if you find it all very shocking best stick to what you like.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...