Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Statistics for you Hugo:


75% of men and 29% of women always have orgasms with their partner (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, Michaels, 1994).


About 85% of men report that their partner had an orgasm at the most recent sexual event; this compares to the 64% of women who report having had an orgasm at their most recent sexual event. (A difference that is too large to be accounted for by some of the men having had male partners at their most recent event.) (NSSHB, 2010.)


Hugo - is your wife one of the ones who fake it??

Sorry, but earlier you said


  Quote
The fact that the majority of women have never experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in my opinion.


Icould be missing the point, but I don't see how that is backed up in any way, by the stats you've just posted.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but earlier you said

>

> The fact that the majority of women have never

> experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly

> discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in

> my opinion.

>

> Icould be missing the point, but I don't see how

> that is backed up in any way, by the stats you've

> just posted.



Yes, sorry, maybe I should have said a large minority of women have not experienced an orgasm. I think it used to be a majority in the dim and distant past, but seems that things have improved somewhat.


Only 64% of women having orgasms is not good though.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I pretty much agree with you GG... BUT,

> this is a slightly different level of discussion

> to a thread on cricket. There are seperate forums

> for this sort of thing you know ;-)



Exactly Keef. Once you get into discussing what content is acceptable for the forum and what isn't then it comes down to censorship. I can't see anybody being in a hurry to grasp that nettle. Frankly, there's nothing on this thread that has disturbed me, whereas some of the content on the various joke threads has left me dumbstruck before now.

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Captain Scarlet Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I am not pretending to be coy at all..in fact I

> am

> > a dirty barstard myself I freely admit it

>

> Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!

>

> I haven't been offended by anything on this

> thread. I will admit to being a bit shocked

> though. Not at the content, but at the context

> more than anything else.


Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!>>Fireman!

No offence taken..

I just hope I have not offended anybody...I was hoping everyone on the forum was open minded?.

Well the only stats I've seen are IV's own. They seem to show her rah rah right on rant was a loadee of oldee bolloxee.


I can't see that helping much when you're down the pub complaining about how hard done by you are, but hell, maybe you're complaining because it's a bonding thing, rather than because its true.

Is he still at it?


I don't recall any conversations with female friends on being hard done by...but yes we could have a very long dicussion of how much women had to do over the last 100 years to get to that place of semi-equality. In fact the only conversations I have with women in the pub are ones that involve us all having a good laugh (because laughter is good for the soul)...something dear H you are obviously desperately in need of....


It seems to me H your issue here is that a group of women are having a conversation about an item that mostly women use. Even worse we are having fun with that conversation as too are the men (apart form you) that have posted. Would you be as indignant if we were discussing the best brand of tampon to use for example....? Probably yes. But it doesn't mean because YOU can not handle it that no-one else should discuss it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Maybe you can get around there and sniff some of the bin juice residue, tell us if it smells more like Southwark or Lambeth or maybe Lewisham.
    • If the implication of the police and NCA is that these are do-nothing, cash-rich sham businesses whose purpose is to launder money, then why do they consume so much energy and can't pay the bills? 🤔 And if this crime is so prevalent and obvious, why aren't there any actual prosecutions to point to? There's heavy reliance on "supposed", "suspected" and "may be" in that BBC article that's entirely unquestioning of the police and NCA information fed to them. Makes you wonder if the police and NCA are over-egging the pudding a little bit. Makes you wonder if some vague stuff you read online last week is a really good basis to go around claiming that our neighbours in East Dulwich are criminals. 
    • Another singing Leon's praises.Professional,efficient.Fairly priced.Great communication.  And happy to do my couple of small jobs.    
    • They’ve overhauled the kitchen and I gather they have a new chef. Also, a new menu is on the way.   What with Norbert’s arriving soon on Melbourne Grove, there’s going to be an Interesting offer down there.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...