Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As a user of DMC Crystal Palace Road I am not really surprised by the results though I am always a little sceptical about these type of tables - look what they resulted in on school admissions. At DMC I don't think I have seen the same GP at all in the last 3 years so you never establish a relationship with anyone, the doctors seemingly always arrive late in the mornings for the first appointment that I normally request, so you are waiting a needlessly long time and there is a general feeling of a lack of patient care/interest at reception. Still it seems much better at DMC than at Melbourne Grove where according to my partner you need a PhD degree in Inventive Problem Solving to work out how to get an appointment and then when you do the GPs English is so bad you can't understand a word they say. Not a good impression from this house then.


What happens as a result of this survey? Do the GPs have to put together some sort of improvement plan with targets? It would make much more interesting reading in the waiting room than the usual stuff they have on their walls which seems to entirely miss the fact that men have health problems too. Perhaps that's why their performance is so poor as they are missing out on reaching half the population.

Not surprised James, I recently wrote a thread bout this going to your local surgery is a nightmare you cannot get appointments when you finally do you have to deal with an (uptight Gestapo receptionist) and what do the surgeries do with this information once it is published do they improve or don't they care?
I am on the patient forum of Nunhead Grove Surgery and this chart is weird because in another one I saw recently it came top by a long way for things like patient satisfaction and opening times and ability of ease to get the doctor you want and when you want, and so on. And they work hard at this sort of thing. I don't understand why they're not nearer the top in the one you have attached, than the one I saw a few weeks ago. Curious! Either way, I can say Nunhead Surgery Practice Manager and her staff and doctors are all very conscientious and work very hard to make sure they do the Right Thing. The doctors insist they'll never go down the route of the 0870 call centre answer system and so on. They are very patient focussed!

Some of the doctors in Melbourne Grove are good but I had a bad experience with one doctor that lead me to seek out an alternative practise.


I wont go into details here but one or two bad experiences could tarnish the reputation of others.


Are you really surprised though James? the amount of people that whine at you all day on your councillor thread clearly shows that the ED massive are complainers.

sedgewick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Some of the doctors in Melbourne Grove are good

> but I had a bad experience with one doctor that

> lead me to seek out an alternative practise.

>

> I wont go into details here but one or two bad

> experiences could tarnish the reputation of

> others.

>

> Are you really surprised though James? the amount

> of people that whine at you all day on your

> councillor thread clearly shows that the ED

> massive are complainers.



There are 4 doctors there now. They had a bad time a while back though, after Concordia took over. They were excellent pre Concordia.

Peckham Rose - I've just moved (because we moved house)to the Nunhead Grove surgery, having previously been at the surgery that came number 1, comparing the two I can see why Nunhead would come lower, the GPs have mostly been lovely and easy to get appointments but a few things have really annoyed me, chiefly having to go over to Dulwich hospital and wait hours to get blood taken (which I have to do regularly) at my previous surgery they could do that on site and on appointment. Also one of the GPs seemed very surprised that I have a very common post-natal condition she told me it was very rare and I know from the literature it isn't at all.


K

And we are going to let these people commission services! Perhaps they should spend their efforts on providing a good and effective service to patients first. I have a great deal of concern if commissioning of oncology services were left to a GP who might only see 4 cancer patients in a single year. Let alone those with rarer cancers!
Very good point and I couldn't agree more. I think the proposed GP commissioning model will be a disaster creating even more frontline botlenecks, particularly in high pressured urban environments. I suspect it will also lead to a lower number of specialist referrals especially from profit hungry GPs. The worry is though they won't performance measure against that type of sepcialist need and the NHS ends up the health service of the lowest common denominator.
Kes I agree. Having to go to Dulwich is a real time consuming pain. It's not the surgery's fault though; they have to do it and they are more than aware of the dissatisfaction. Apparently things are changing; but I highly recommend you either join the forum when it meets or at the least write to CHRISTINE LANDRETH the Practice Manager and tell her of your irritation. The more that do it the better. As for the other issue, I can't comment!

Re local blood taking - while it is true that the Dulwich Hospital waiting time is generally intolerable, it is also true that the phlebotomists there are generally expert, quick, painless and unobtrusive - I have had blood drawn by the inexpert which has required several goes, has been painful, and has left extensive and long lasting bruising.


Locally drawn blood (in surgeries) in my experience requires a high volume of patients and a dedicated phlebotomist if the result is to be generally happy - occasional and inexperienced blood drawing is not to be recommended.

Hi James

Doesn't suprise me either, I've been going to Forest Hill Road Group Practice and they are about as friendly as a nest of vipers having just been poked with a big stick ....It's all very well changing the names of these various clinics and printing wonderful propganda booklets telling us how great they are and how often they hit targets... but all we need is a surgery that can answer phones and know what they are talking about when they do.


I read in the local paper that doctors where getting better... well they should really as they don't have to wait days to see one !!

I was with DMC fo years, and never really had any complaints at the time.


However, since moving up to Sydenham, and joining the Wells Park Practice, which is probably a similar size, I have realised that I could have been getting a much better service from the DMC.

Keef


I was with Wells Park Practice a long time ago in 1987 and they were very good to me.

Once a doctor, called Carol, drove me to Lewisham hospital herself the same day she saw me, as I had a serious infection. Are they down rated now? I hope not, because they were all very good at the time.

sedgewick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> Are you really surprised though James? the amount

> of people that whine at you all day on your

> councillor thread clearly shows that the ED

> massive are complainers.


I was recently advised by two members of staff at Kings that I should complain formally about my so-called GP and they suggested I change surgeries too, owing in a large degree to the appalling referral this GP made, which they both described as "very, very poor". I think they were a bit stunned. That's not an ED'er complaining, that's two health professionals who are not receiving healthcare information from a primary carer, which they need to do their job and care properly for the person in front of them.

Hi sedgwick,

As a generalisation East Dulwich people arn't in my opinion whingers.

Virtually every contact I get is from people that have real issues - often they show an endemic problem that needs fixing for the benefit of all.

Sometimes the issue only affects that person but really needs a more considerate application of a rule.

Sometimes an explanation of why a ruling has been made is all that's required.


Hi louisiana,

Sounds shocking and hpefully you'll make a formal complaint.

Without such complaints the PCT can't easilly hold the GP practice to account.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Went to the junction today to check the "scene of the event" to try and work out from the tyre marks on the road and the damage to the kerb, what were the contributing factors to the accident. Here are my observations and deductions. 1.Compaction type refuse collection trucks, such as these, are exceptionally "tail-heavy" due the the weight of the hydraulic compaction mechanism and the fact that this weight is positioned on the  rear overhang ie behind the rear wheels. 2. To compensate for the extra weight, the truck is fitted with a "tag axle". The tag axle is located  forward of the rearmost axle. When fully laden, all the rear tyres will be running at very close to their operating limit. 3. The tag axle has only 2 wheels as opposed to 4 wheels on the rearmost axle. So on either side at the rear, there a three wheels. So if one rear tyre on the near side has lost pressure,  the weight carried by the remaining two is increased by 50%. 4. Being tail-heavy with a high centre of gravity, the driver of such vehicles should be ultra cautious when cornering. 5. When turning to the right,  the weight imposed on near side tyres is further increased depending on the speed involved. 6. The two long curved tyre marks on the road  suggest that only two of the 3 tyres on the near side were taking the weight.  7 These curved tyre marks end abruptly and I'm trying to work out exactly why. This spot is  very close to where the  near side rear wheels  slide up against the kerb and the wheel rims gouge out chunks  of the kerb stones. There is a possibility that the driver braked late and so caused the tyres to loose all grip and so slide into the kerb. If there are any forensic traffic experts around, I would welcome their take on this.
    • I don't think there are stupid questions Sue.  There are informative questions, policy questions, normative questions.... You suggest to do a sort of survey! Interesting idea but not for me as I have other priorities and if I do not address these with NHS doctors I will go, once again, privately.  In any case as many people using this forum know, GP surgeries in England offer at present services that in most cases do not and cannot cover matters that are under the remit of secondary care - for instance rheumatologists clinics in hospitals. If the dismantlement of NHS England will bring possible positive changes also in primary care with more choices for people  I do not know but I would really hope so because at the moment lot of people with chronic rheumatic conditions  fall into the cracks  of he system, that means are not seen by NHS rheumatologists that have long queues and cannot be cured by GPs neither in most cases, even when (I am sure about this and I would like to know more) there are physicians and local GPs fully qualified and experts to do such jobs even if they are not rheumatologists!    Thank you for your time Sue and by the way  if you do any survey like the one you mentioned please let us know. 
    • There was a thread about this a year ago that included a post from the new owners. Be great to have an update - nothing seemed to be happening when I walked by last week. https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/343709-kenro-press-empty-shop-forest-hill-road/#comment-1662773
    • And don't the Veolia collection teams wear uniforms with Southwark Council logo on them...this might explain why the councillors were so keen to point out the lorry wasn't operated by the council because if you saw a load of people clambering out of the cab of a lorry one that just rolled wearing clothing emblazoned with the council logo you might think it was being operated by the council. The Helen Hayes reference is weird as well it was almost as if the councillor post was: this is awful, nothing to do with us, speak to Helen.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...