Jump to content

Is it only "Hipsters" who don't want high rise development on the Morrison car park in Peckham?


Recommended Posts

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/hipsters-fury-over-building-plan-which-would-block-the-view-from-peckham-rooftop-hangout-franks-a3469861.html


What's a consultation?


Is there a meaning to views in the time of housing shortage?


Do "types" of people want to live in vastly different ways? (the 80% in the middle not the extreme outliers)

Peckham Vision do seem deeply reactionary at times. I can't recall the last housing development they supported. But I do think they have a point here. 20 stories is out of proportion to the rest of the area. Other than some of the horrific housing blocks that went up in the sixties. The Aylesham is a dump. So development is welcome. But keep the height down and the views across Peckham as they are.
The only solution to the 'housing shortage' in London (or rather the 'overpopulation' of London) is to move all the people who are workshy and perpetually on benefits out of the city thereby freeing up accommodation for actual workers...just a thought...

To where, exactly?


Cute little sound bites are all very well - and you're excellent at them - but I'm genuinely interested to know where you think workshy benefit scrounges should go, as well as how we determine who is a workshy benefit scrounger (preferably no more private companies making money from telling disabled people they're able to work)?


Shipping out the dead wood certainly has something to it, but what happens to the communities they get sent to? Doesn't that just exacerbate the issues small towns have been facing with immigration for years? How does dumping large numbers of unemployed on them help? Or do we create tent cities? Our own Calais jungle down on Dartmoor?


Or do you only mean non-UK passport holders? Do you believe once they're gone the job market will stabilise? It's certainly possible, but with every passing year I become less and less enamoured of Young British workers; indeed I'm probably about to fire one this week who simply seems to lack a work ethic - and he's not even an idiot, he just doesn't get it - and it's likely he'll be replaced by the EU citizen who already works for me, wants to be promoted and has shown he can do the job.


There's nowhere near enough housing in London, nowhere near enough doctors or infrastructure, not enough good schools and teachers and libraries, it's harder and harder and more expensive to live here. Is simply dumping people out past zone 6 the answer? Should we define what's needed for people to have the right to live here? A job? Paying taxes? Contributing to society?


You know, if I thought the idea would work I'd honestly be behind it, but the problem of the workshy on benefits (and I'd be really interested to see a social/ethnic breakdown of who that is, a proper one, not some assumptions), is that they need to be forced to get jobs, so we can tax them and get more money for the state and more private enterprise going. A Soviet-style rejection of anyone who doesn't measure up to an arbitrary standard has never worked and never will.

The Hipster headline is a bit strange, as if people visiting Franks, and who are notorious

for being transient (they move onto the next hip area soon enough) matter more than people

who live here.


Maybe it's a straw man headline by the Standard ?

Programme on BBC1 this morning called Britain's Home Truths. Only caught the last 5 minutes or so but looked interesting and was all about how Peckham was changing. Presenter used to live in Peckham.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only solution to the 'housing shortage' in

> London (or rather the 'overpopulation' of London)

> is to move all the people who are workshy and

> perpetually on benefits out of the city thereby

> freeing up accommodation for actual workers...just

> a thought...




I'd go for Joy-O-Meter test, where they score you on just how miserable you are. People like you could be exited to the 'outer rim' of the cities.


There you could practice your 'shouting but not listening' style of communication, in a bell-jar like experiment of nothingness

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The only solution to the 'housing shortage' in

> > London (or rather the 'overpopulation' of

> London)

> > is to move all the people who are workshy and

> > perpetually on benefits out of the city thereby

> > freeing up accommodation for actual

> workers...just

> > a thought...

>

>

>

> I'd go for Joy-O-Meter test, where they score you

> on just how miserable you are. People like you

> could be exited to the 'outer rim' of the cities.

>

> There you could practice your 'shouting but not

> listening' style of communication, in a bell-jar

> like experiment of nothingness


Underground I reckon, Farage can go down there too.


and Piers Morgan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...