Jump to content

Is it only "Hipsters" who don't want high rise development on the Morrison car park in Peckham?


Recommended Posts

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/hipsters-fury-over-building-plan-which-would-block-the-view-from-peckham-rooftop-hangout-franks-a3469861.html


What's a consultation?


Is there a meaning to views in the time of housing shortage?


Do "types" of people want to live in vastly different ways? (the 80% in the middle not the extreme outliers)

Peckham Vision do seem deeply reactionary at times. I can't recall the last housing development they supported. But I do think they have a point here. 20 stories is out of proportion to the rest of the area. Other than some of the horrific housing blocks that went up in the sixties. The Aylesham is a dump. So development is welcome. But keep the height down and the views across Peckham as they are.
The only solution to the 'housing shortage' in London (or rather the 'overpopulation' of London) is to move all the people who are workshy and perpetually on benefits out of the city thereby freeing up accommodation for actual workers...just a thought...

To where, exactly?


Cute little sound bites are all very well - and you're excellent at them - but I'm genuinely interested to know where you think workshy benefit scrounges should go, as well as how we determine who is a workshy benefit scrounger (preferably no more private companies making money from telling disabled people they're able to work)?


Shipping out the dead wood certainly has something to it, but what happens to the communities they get sent to? Doesn't that just exacerbate the issues small towns have been facing with immigration for years? How does dumping large numbers of unemployed on them help? Or do we create tent cities? Our own Calais jungle down on Dartmoor?


Or do you only mean non-UK passport holders? Do you believe once they're gone the job market will stabilise? It's certainly possible, but with every passing year I become less and less enamoured of Young British workers; indeed I'm probably about to fire one this week who simply seems to lack a work ethic - and he's not even an idiot, he just doesn't get it - and it's likely he'll be replaced by the EU citizen who already works for me, wants to be promoted and has shown he can do the job.


There's nowhere near enough housing in London, nowhere near enough doctors or infrastructure, not enough good schools and teachers and libraries, it's harder and harder and more expensive to live here. Is simply dumping people out past zone 6 the answer? Should we define what's needed for people to have the right to live here? A job? Paying taxes? Contributing to society?


You know, if I thought the idea would work I'd honestly be behind it, but the problem of the workshy on benefits (and I'd be really interested to see a social/ethnic breakdown of who that is, a proper one, not some assumptions), is that they need to be forced to get jobs, so we can tax them and get more money for the state and more private enterprise going. A Soviet-style rejection of anyone who doesn't measure up to an arbitrary standard has never worked and never will.

The Hipster headline is a bit strange, as if people visiting Franks, and who are notorious

for being transient (they move onto the next hip area soon enough) matter more than people

who live here.


Maybe it's a straw man headline by the Standard ?

Programme on BBC1 this morning called Britain's Home Truths. Only caught the last 5 minutes or so but looked interesting and was all about how Peckham was changing. Presenter used to live in Peckham.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only solution to the 'housing shortage' in

> London (or rather the 'overpopulation' of London)

> is to move all the people who are workshy and

> perpetually on benefits out of the city thereby

> freeing up accommodation for actual workers...just

> a thought...




I'd go for Joy-O-Meter test, where they score you on just how miserable you are. People like you could be exited to the 'outer rim' of the cities.


There you could practice your 'shouting but not listening' style of communication, in a bell-jar like experiment of nothingness

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The only solution to the 'housing shortage' in

> > London (or rather the 'overpopulation' of

> London)

> > is to move all the people who are workshy and

> > perpetually on benefits out of the city thereby

> > freeing up accommodation for actual

> workers...just

> > a thought...

>

>

>

> I'd go for Joy-O-Meter test, where they score you

> on just how miserable you are. People like you

> could be exited to the 'outer rim' of the cities.

>

> There you could practice your 'shouting but not

> listening' style of communication, in a bell-jar

> like experiment of nothingness


Underground I reckon, Farage can go down there too.


and Piers Morgan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...