Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree - the NHS is in

> an absolute mess, but the staff have shouted long

> enough. We are heading to an insurance based

> system, and it is in the interest of the

> destructors to make it look like it doesn't work.

> It does work, it did work, and it can work. It is

> chronically underfunded and the staff are broken.

> If you work with us, we can pull it back.


Brilliant post from someone who's able to draw from his / her broad experience of the NHS rather than extrapolating from one or two isolated incidents. And echoing others here, if you look at any breakdown of cost pressures on the NHS it's aging population, costs of new technologies and new types of treatments which hugely outweigh any cost pressures from immigrant patients. Immigrants coming to the UK tend to be young....

As I said above, 1p extra on income tax raises ?4.6 billion. We're talking 4-6p extra just to keep the NHS's nose above water, if you believe current reports, so I don't think hypothecation would really be an issue.


Usually the conversation goes like this:


We need more spent on the NHS

If you want more spent on the NHS, taxes will have to go up.

Why should I have to pay more tax? Why aren't we taxing [insert name of any famous multinational here]?


Some people, like you and me, would be happy to pay more, but most want someone else to pay.

To fix it with tax we are talking -realistically - a several percentage point increase in the basic rate of tax.


The problem with more tax is in reality a smaller and smaller amount of people pay a larger and larger share of tax in reality (especially when transfers are put in) - they are probably less keen and we are getting to a point where the social contract would start to break on this, I feel. Frame it as say - more tax into the NHS but your tax credits will be cut I'm not sure you'd get such support. High rate tax much past 40Ish% starts to be counterproductive (ask Hollande).


People's income are squeezed as is - some more tax at a general level, especially in the 'squeezed middle' will reduce this further


The multiplier effect of public spending is generally below private expenditure - our economy is doing just about OK spurred largely by Consumer Spending...take several % points out of people's income and this grinds to a halt.


I don't (genuinely) think tax is the answer here as it won't 'fix it (NHS)' in the long term. We have to cut spending elsewhere; operate within existing budgets; do health better........or fund via some self-funding of sorts direct or contrinbutory/insurance (as is the case in much of Europe) . But, you know, national religon

But if you ask people to fund their healthcare directly they will reasonable expect their tax payments to go down. Otherwise what's the point?


And then it's a choice between the same level of service, just paid differently, or a better service that costs more, or a worse service if you can't afford it.

When I was studying Social Policy for my degree many moons ago, the Welfare State was set up to address the chronic health needs of the country and was originally based, if I recall, on the German system. The aim was that raising the status of people's health over a generation, would then see the gradual introduction of an insurance based system. The idea being once that people achieved a high standard of health and were able to work, they could afford to pay insurance via their employers/insurance schemes which would cover medical expenses. This is certainly the norm in most European countries.

A viable idea, if you have enough people earning enough money to support that.


A quick glance at wages and cost of living in this country will rapidly dissolve the idea that private healthcare schemes are affordable to the majority of families, and probably to many individuals too.

Austria works this way, and works very well indeed. As far as I could work out, there was a percentage levy paid by both employees and employers that went into an 'insurance' fund. Free at the point of delivery like the NHS, but more complex in its underlying funding.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Austria works this way, and works very well

> indeed. As far as I could work out, there was a

> percentage levy paid by both employees and

> employers that went into an 'insurance' fund.

> Free at the point of delivery like the NHS, but

> more complex in its underlying funding.


Interesting. I overheard on conversation the other night which described how Austria is the hardest country to get a passport from - the speaker was a man with an Austrian mother who said that he had been unable to obtain one, and that they hardly ever give them out.

I'm unsure of how immigration in Austria affects their health service (obviously they have some very right wing politicians), but if they're already very picky about who they let in it must make it easier to control a scheme like that surely?

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting. I overheard on conversation the other

> night which described how Austria is the hardest

> country to get a passport from - the speaker was a

> man with an Austrian mother who said that he had

> been unable to obtain one, and that they hardly

> ever give them out.


> I'm unsure of how immigration in Austria affects

> their health service (obviously they have some

> very right wing politicians), but if they're

> already very picky about who they let in it must

> make it easier to control a scheme like that

> surely?


I didn't have an Austrian passport, but I did work there and was covered under their system. You get issued a card by the government when you start work, which has health system details on one side and the EHIC card on the other.


I had a (UK) friend who did his ACL there. Within a week he'd been operated on and started physio, all under the health system. You'd be lucky to have had all that in the UK in three months.


But it is a contradiction of a country - Austrians are generally lovely and welcoming people, but they are also really quite religious, conservative and traditional.

  • 3 weeks later...

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Austria works this way, and works very well

> indeed. As far as I could work out, there was a

> percentage levy paid by both employees and

> employers that went into an 'insurance' fund.

> Free at the point of delivery like the NHS, but

> more complex in its underlying funding.


Kind of like National Insurance then, only hypothecated.

I m not impressed . I have been to the emergency in Lewisham and the 3 times I waited for 3 hours .....while I was waiting an old man waiting like me pass out .


Is not only in the UK , in my country is the same .Unlucky I have spend lots of time in Hospital, had surgeries and accident (I m an very active person , less now tho), and always had the problem to wait for so long ......the problem is the same , not enough staff working , staff under paid , staff tired and sick .... I don t have any idea what we can do for get a better service ....maybe everyone should pay the tax and NIN ?!?!?!?

Interesting report in sun today concerning the NHS.regarding dyson fans vacuum cleaners .the cost to the NHS ?1.2m.enough for another 65 nurses.not hundreds you might say but its a start also ?130million is wasted each year .on admin according to a freedom of information request from England's 236 hospital trusts. 2 previous posts Angelia and johnL might find it interesting.

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting report in sun today concerning the

> NHS.regarding dyson fans vacuum cleaners .the cost

> to the NHS ?1.2m.enough for another 65 nurses.


The quote in the Sun was "The ?1.4million spent in total on Dyson gear over the past five years would pay for 65 nurses."


Not defending the purchasing, but I hate statistical stupidity like that. That sentence is just complete and utter bollocks.

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The bit about the fans is true .made a post back in February 16th.


Oh, I'm sure they spent lots on Dyson fans, but saying that the money would 'pay for 65 nurses' is the bollocksy bit.


And sadly, it's not just the Sun wot does it. Even the broadsheets' use of stats is rather dubious sometimes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...