Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just to say, a visit to Poundland land and I discovered that Smith's flavoured crisps have been returned to the market. Available in Cheese and Onion, Salt and Vinegar, and Ready Salted. ?1 for a multipack of 7, and they still have the old authentic flavour I remember. Very impressed.


Louisa.

I once bought a whole box of Walkers Cheese and Onion, in Glasgow


Then proceeded to drive non-stop to London and ate all 44 bags on the way.


I couldn't eat (blue packet or not) crisps for years after that.



I do like this rant on another forum

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussion/1211975/why-have-walkers-crisps-got-away-with-scamming-everyone-for-years

dc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Smiths brand has been owned by PepsiCo since

> the 1990s. They also own Walkers.



This is true, and in some countries they brand themselves as Leys. However, Smiths is regarded as a heritage brand, and has in recent years been used to brand their 'value range', Chipsticks, Snaps and Frazzles come under this. They also still have the Scampi fries branding too. This new range, is a return of the Smiths Crisp brand name to flavoured crisps, not seen that in at least 25 years. Made by Walkers, but cheaper.


Louisa.

I recently noticed these in our office vending machine:




I've never had them before. Are they reasonably edible? It is the cheapest item in there (by quite some margin), but nevertheless, I do not want to waste fifty hard-earned pence on something revolting.

They are very good. Very salty and vinegary.



Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I recently noticed these in our office vending

> machine:

>

>

>

> I've never had them before. Are they reasonably

> edible? It is the cheapest item in there (by quite

> some margin), but nevertheless, I do not want to

> waste fifty hard-earned pence on something

> revolting.

We await your taste test feedback with baited breath Jeremy.


I like them. Slightly more powdery than Cheddars, but boom, the vinegar does hit you straight in the kisser.


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks. Food for thought!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A beer in the garden would have been nice, I'm sure! Mine was a meal inside. I don't remember much about it except that it was horrible.
    • Went to the Harvester a couple of times to have a beer in the garden, it was quite popular and had a 'certain' charm. 
    • I never went in The Grove when it was a pub, but I had a meal there once when it was a Harvester (I used to occasionally be a Mystery Shopper, and I was persuaded to go and have this meal because it was a bank holiday and they couldn't find anyone else to do it.) It was truly horrible. At least I got paid for eating it, albeit not very much, but I think I would have paid not to have to eat it. If it becomes an "affordable" restaurant again, I hope at least it has decent food. Why do "these youngsters" need "adult help" to be enterprising? They aren't six year olds! 
    • At the end of the day, whilst these youngsters have been enterprising presumably with adult help & I also assume no local youth group - the fact remains that it is a prime site fir redevelopment be it a supermarket - Aldi, Lidel whatever or social housing which, let’s be honest here lots  of people need.   Know Idea why has been derelict gor do long anyhow, but somewhere on this site I think there is a problem with who owns it. And let’s not forget the homeless man who slept there - Front on Lordship Lane who had his home destroyed by I assume vandals a couple of years ago.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...