Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rainbows do not actually exist.


They are an Optical Illusion caused by a Prismatic effect of the sunlight on raindrops.


Rainbows viewed from High Altitude Aircraft can be seen as complete Circles.


So sadly they do not have Ends and hence no 'Pot of Gold' :(


Nice Pics though. ;-)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rainbows do not actually exist.

>

> They are an Optical Illusion caused by a Prismatic

> effect of the sunlight on raindrops.

>

> Rainbows viewed from High Altitude Aircraft can be

> seen as complete Circles.

>

> So sadly they do not have Ends and hence no 'Pot

> of Gold' :(

>

> Nice Pics though. ;-)



Hey thanks for that DulwichFox - could you make sure you pop round on xmas eve and give my kids the hard facts about Mr Claus?


;-)

Lol, Keef and legalbeagle.


We saw the double rainbow from the front of a bus on the way to Deptford, and at one point the end of the main bow appeared to be over Canary Wharf.


Was amazing how it got brighter and brighter.


I love rainbows :) Would like to have seen it over East Dulwich, so thanks for the pix!

legalbeagle Wrote:

-----------------------

> Hey thanks for that DulwichFox - could you make

> sure you pop round on xmas eve and give my kids

> the hard facts about Mr Claus?

>

> ;-)


No Problem.


Should I explain about Tooth Fairies as well. ;-)


Trouble is, Who does eat the Mince Pie and drink the Sherry. ?


Where does the Sixpence under the pillow come from. ?

I did think the rainbow was beautiful, hence my earlier posting. However I don't think doubble or even triple rainbows are that unusual-if you look carefully they are often there. However I think this one was brighter than usual, perhaps because the quality of the light and the placing of the dark clouds
In truth light is white, but when refraction of light in water takes place, the human eye perceives the entire gamut of colours.


This is completely incorrect. Just because it's on the internet doesn't make it true.


Different colours are just different frequencies of light. The water vapour disperses the coloured components of white light at different angles. There is no illusion.

Some people believe that Rainbows have magical healing properties, and it is said that faith healers use the colours of the rays separately to heal different ailments. Even the pharmaceutical company's believe this to be true and colour their medicines accordingly. It is also believed that a rainbow is sent by god to help ease the pain and suffering and happens after tragic incidents.


I don't believe any of this mumbo jumbo myself.


Jacko.

Oh dear, this has become mumbo jumbo couched in unreasonable deductions based on experiential evidence.


Jeremy is quite right, our Basque friends do not have the inside story on rainbows. Refraction does bend light waves of different frequencies by different degrees. A rainbow is not an illusion. Blue light, with it's smaller wavelength will be bent (scattered) more than longer wavelength red light. It's the same reason the sky is blue (all that blue light scattered all over the place) and sunsets are red (because all of the shorter wavelength colours have been scattered by traveling through so much atmosphere leaving just the red to travel to your eye).


Pills have a different colour not because colours are 'healing' but because the mind responds differently to colour signals that are entirely natural in their provenance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...