Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wasn't able to watch all of it but I generally like Fergal Keane's take on things. Aerial photography is fascinating and I liked the way he linked the two technological developments that makes it possible. It is also fascinating how WWI continues to hold us in its thrall. There was also an item on BH this morning on war poetry and how we always remember the poems of Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon but who can name a poet from WWII or from more recent conflicts?

There is plenty of poetry about and influenced by WWII but I think there's lots of reasons why WWI has become, in the UK public's mind, the poets' war.


First, there was the deliberate effort by the WWI poets (most of them) to deal with the conditions, scale, scope and pointlessness of much of the war - both for themselves but also to cry out on a public basis.


(Similarly, in terms of highlighting the cause, see the Spanish Civil War)


There's a view that WWII, as a just cause, did not require such conciousness raising (it was also a civilian war in the UK in the way WWI was not). Also, if you were a poet in WWII, how did you respond in an artistic sense to what were already known as the War Poets, and to the Spanish war poets?


Then there's the effect of the mass media. Although there was a rabidly patriotic print press in the UK, WW1 was fought without mass radio, film, TV and the internet to tell the story. This means the written word is much more dominant in the artistic response to the war, and also meant an alternative commentary to the official story was lacking.


Finally there's perhaps something in the scale of its impact on British consciousness - twice as many deaths as the Second World War and the first time the country had experience such scale of loss - that impacted on the artistic response. Quite simply there was a need to understand what had happened through an alternative telling of the war.


It was the poets that provided this narrative of brave lads undermined by idiotic commanders, and that is the story of the war that has become the truth for most of the public, which in turn has reinforced the poetry as the primary artistic response to the war.

That's a compelling analysis, most of which I am familiar with. I wonder what role class and education have had in establishing and keeping the WWI poets in the public consciousness down the decades. But, I didn't mean to redirect the thread from its focus on the TV programme.

Oh no, direct away. This is the lounge after all.


I do think there's a horrible sort of romance to the "war to end all wars" and I think Ted's hit the nail on the head as to why. There's something about our fine lads going off to the slaughter that feels like the end of a beautiful era in a way that WWII didn't (is that just too much literature and costume drama I wonder).


I also think there's an element of being considerably more removed from it - as Ted rightly points out, WWI wasn't (for the UK) a civilian war, so people at home were spared the grisly reality. Some of the detail from last night will stay with me for a long time - I had no idea about the tunnels and mines, and when they said that the biggest part of a German soldier they found after a series of mine detonations was a foot in a boot, it really brought home the visceral, sticky, gory reality. And to know that a lot of those remains are still located at the bottom of ponds on a golf course, my god, that's haunting, but I think, not commonly known at the time.


There was a lovely moment in the programme though, when the daughter of the pilot who captured the scene from the air saw her dad smiling on camera. I may have sobbed at that point. In fact, I'm welling up just thinking about it now.

Sebastian Faulks's Birdsong is very moving in relation to WWI. Some of the main characters are tunnellers as I recall. I did see the part in the TV documentary where the daughter saw the footage of her dad, very moving. I thought the images were remarkably clear and detailed and it takes a thoughtful commentator like Fergal Keane to make the connections that show we are less removed from it than we might think.

I just watched it on iplayer. The aerial photography really hits home the scale of it. And how moving for the daughter at the end to see her father on film.


I personally think that WWl stands out because it was an arrogant war, both in it's causes and the attitudes of those that so enthusiastically took europe into it. The tragedy is the human suffering and cost and poetry seems to be the idea medium for comunicating that. There also wasn't yet the mass media, that would follow WWll.

There was also a programme on recently regrding the last day of WW1. It highlighted the refusal by some generals to stand their troops down and sent them into action despite the fact that they knew the armistice had been signed. Senseless. It was very moving to watch, especially when the futility of it all hit you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The main problem Post Offices have, IMO, is they are generally a sub optimal experience and don't really deliver services in the way people  want or need these days. I always dread having to use one as you know it will be time consuming and annoying. 
    • If you want to look for blame, look at McKinsey's. It was their model of separating cost and profit centres which started the restructuring of the Post Office - once BT was fully separated off - into Lines of Business - Parcels; Mail Delivery and Retail outlets (set aside the whole Giro Bank nonsense). Once you separate out these lines of business and make them 'stand-alone' you immediately make them vulnerable to sell off and additionally, by separating the 'businesses' make each stand or fall on their own, without cross subsidy. The Post Office took on banking and some government outsourced activity - selling licences and passports etc. as  additional revenue streams to cross subsidize the postal services, and to offer an incentive to outsourced sub post offices. As a single 'comms' delivery business the Post Office (which included the telcom business) made financial sense. Start separating elements off and it doesn't. Getting rid of 'non profitable' activity makes sense in a purely commercial environment, but not in one which is also about overall national benefit - where having an affordable and effective communications (in its largest sense) business is to the national benefit. Of course, the fact the the Government treated the highly profitable telecoms business as a cash cow (BT had a negative PSBR - public sector borrowing requirement - which meant far from the public purse funding investment in infrastructure BT had to lend the government money every year from it's operating surplus) meant that services were terrible and the improvement following privatisation was simply the effect of BT now being able to invest in infrastructure - which is why (partly) its service quality soared in the years following privatisation. I was working for BT through this period and saw what was happening there.
    • But didn't that separation begin with New Labour and Peter Mandelson?
    • I am not disputing that the Post Office remains publicly owned. But the Lib Dems’ decision to separate and privatise Royal Mail has fatally undermined the PO.  It is within the power of the Labour government to save what is left of the PO and the service it provides to the community, if they care enough; I suspect they do not.  However, the appalling postal service is a constant reminder of the Lib Dems’ duplicity on this matter. It is actions taken under the Lib Dem / Conservative coalition that have brought us to this point.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...