Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No idea who owns the Police Station, Sue. Perhaps it's government owned. There have been rumours about it closing down ever since I moved here. But the costs involved would be astronomical, that land must be worth a couple of million... not to mention the huge refurb job.

Occasionally I find myself surprised at my response to questions like these. In theory, I should be absolutely supportive of such an idea - I work in the arts, I regularly attend 'arts events' across a number of genres, and I can think of arts centres that I've been to and really loved.


But but but...... does East Dulwich really need one? I'm not so sure....I think most of us can agree that we have ready access to some of the best arts facilities in the country- The South Bank is a mere bus away for example. And on a smaller scale there's lots going on locally - from cinema clubs to comedy, art exhibitions ranging from South London Gallery in Peckham to Dulwich Picture Gallery, even music-wise there are options though I would be more inclined to indicate there's a gap in provision there.


And my gut feeling is that if people aren't inclined to seek such things out when the reality is a twenty minute walk, then who knows if they would attend an arts centre. Arts centres can be great but they can also suck the soul out of an event - give me a gig in a pub anyday or a reading in a bookshop. Different spaces and venues bring with them different benefits - and yes, disadvantages.


Arts centres often work in smaller towns where there is an absolute need for provision and where they become a focus for the community. I was in Lewes only this weekend and was thrilled at seeing half the town walking into the arts centre - a beautiful converted church - to see a film. People were greeting each other - it felt like a hub of actvity, it was hugely exciting. But there is nothing more depressing than an under-used arts centre. Salisbury Art Centre where I once worked was beautiful yet soul destroying in its emptiness. Chats Palace in Hackney was similarly underused - despite one would think a 'need' due to lack of local facilities, and there is a new arts centre in Shoreditch which again just doesn't have the same vibrancy and excitement one finds just down the road at gigs and exhibitions in Brick Lane.


I think AJM's suggestion of a virtual 'hub' is an excellent one where information on all that is happening can be made accessible. Venues could have their own page so there was a one- stop south east London information portal. But bricks and mortar, salaries, rates, electricity, keeping a building staffed, negotiating late licences, marketing, fundraising, health and safety, public liability insurance.....nope, I'm not so sure.

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I think AJM's suggestion of a virtual 'hub' is an

> excellent one where information on all that is

> happening can be made accessible.


xxxxxxxxx


Isn't that what the "What's On" section of this forum provides?

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bellenden Belle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > I think AJM's suggestion of a virtual 'hub' is

> an excellent one where information on all that is

> > happening can be made accessible.

>

> xxxxxxxxx

>

> Isn't that what the "What's On" section of this

> forum provides?



Not really. It provides lots of valuable information and is very useful but it isn't focused on the arts and so people need to look through lots of information. There are little oppportunities for venues to really market their products - an image can speak a thousand words etc etc etc.

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Bellenden Belle Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > I think AJM's suggestion of a virtual 'hub'

> is

> > an excellent one where information on all that

> is

> > > happening can be made accessible.

> >

> > xxxxxxxxx

> >

> > Isn't that what the "What's On" section of this

> > forum provides?

>

>

> Not really. It provides lots of valuable

> information and is very useful but it isn't

> focused on the arts and so people need to look

> through lots of information. There are little

> oppportunities for venues to really market their

> products - an image can speak a thousand words etc

> etc etc.


xxxxxxx


But surely that's why people have websites, and can link to them via their posts in the "What's On" section?


I do think there's a danger of duplication.


Who would run the umbrella website, and who would decide what was "arts" and what wasn't?


Comedy? Folk music? Dancing classes?


ETA: And what geographical area would it cover? And who would draw the line?

>

> But surely that's why people have websites, and

> can link to them via their posts in the "What's

> On" section?

>

> I do think there's a danger of duplication.

>

> Who would run the umbrella website, and who would

> decide what was "arts" and what wasn't?

>

> Comedy? Folk music? Dancing classes?

>

> ETA: And what geographical area would it cover?

> And who would draw the line?


Sue surely you can see the difference between an umbrella website for the arts and a listing section of a local forum covering arts, jumble sales, public debates, etc etc?



But if you can't, let's return to the original idea you suggested in your first post. An arts centre. Now look at all the questions above and apply them again ... duplication of facilities; who "decides" the programme. Who takes responsibility - for the marketing, fundraising, general maintenance......


Answer me those questions; make a case for support of why East Dulwich needs an arts centre and we can go from there.....

Sue has asked some fundamental questions that apply to any public endeavour. As BB points out, they apply equally to a building based initiative or a web based one. The thing is, you are more likely to succeed in getting the web based version up and running. I also really like the idea of shared information or user driven content to use the web3 jargon (I think). Maybe it could start off as a new culture vulture thread on this forum to see what the interest is. maybe a few of the people referred to in Sue's OP could moderate it, research and post info on arts events while others could oomment on them. The moderators could filter the section and redirect those that are not within the "cultural policy" of the section. Just a thought.

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Sue surely you can see the difference between an

> umbrella website for the arts and a listing

> section of a local forum covering arts, jumble

> sales, public debates, etc etc?

>

>

> But if you can't, let's return to the original

> idea you suggested in your first post.


xxxxxxxx


I'm sorry I ever started this thread now.

Sue Wrote:

>

> xxxxxxxx

>

> I'm sorry I ever started this thread now.



Goodness! I'm sorry you feel that way....I really was trying to be helpful. Isn't it much more useful to have a proper discussion about the reality of an arts centre than to build castles (or arts centres) in the sky.

Camberwell Village Hall: the building is owned by a Camberwell/Peckham church, but there's been a fairly lively campaign to share use for local arts and culture. I'm having a sit down meeting with Victor and co at the campaign in a few days and can maybe report back relevant/useful info that they don't mind putting in the public domain.


Anther interesting project has been The Bigger Picture in Crystal Palace. That moved from a tiny shop to an old car showroom. I went to an exhibition launch there a few weeks back - good. Unfortunately it looks like they may have to move out if the owner sells as it looks like he might be about to do. The nature of pop up.


I think shared space/multi-purpose is the way forward.

I don't have any vested interest in this topic since I don't work in the arts or ents. I just want to point out that the two aren't mutually exclusive - physical and virtual space for arts activity. That's a bit obvious perhaps but arts activity has the potential to enrich our lives immensely and the focus that can come from a well conceived and run arts "centre" can enhance that potential. Pop up - from what I know of it - is great but that's not an arts centre where people can get go to with the expectation of engaging in a range of cultural activities.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bellenden Belle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Sue surely you can see the difference between

> an

> > umbrella website for the arts and a listing

> > section of a local forum covering arts, jumble

> > sales, public debates, etc etc?

> >

> >

> > But if you can't, let's return to the original

> > idea you suggested in your first post.

>

> xxxxxxxx

>

> I'm sorry I ever started this thread now.


Don't be!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...