Jump to content

Recommended Posts

nutty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "excellent schools" *splutter*

>

> depends on whether you live in the postage stamped

> size catchment area of the ones mentioned, or can

> afford to go private....



Have to agree Nutty, although the primary schools are getting better, they are still pretty average (Dulwich Village CofE accepted) and secondary schools mmmm, yet all the articles/estate agents go on and on about this, I presume it's the private ones plus the fact that most estate agents are about 17 and have no idea about how good the actual schools are and thus a myth is born to naive planning family couples who haven't really looked at the scores.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwich & Sydenham woods begin at the top of

> Lordship Lane. That's pretty impressive open-space

> for zone2.

>

> Very true, but I'm not sure any of it is actually

> in SE22.


And it's not in Zone 2 either.

Stop moaning everyone....it's as good a place as any in London. It has issues etc...it's just a crap piece of journalism in a crap newspaper. But it's free advertising. Just accept it for what it is! Don't take life too seriously Mr/Mrs/Ms East Dulwich!

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's just a media rouse by the journo to

> push local house prices up....she/he probably owns

> one and is trying to sell >:D<


My chips are tasting strange, what could it be? Great Scott, it's, it's URINE!!!!

Don't think she can be local as Waverley school was long since pulled down and replaced by Harris.

Can't say I've ever seen Sue Perkins around either (though maybe she's keeping a low profile) - I

thought perhaps she meant Jenny Eclair...

nutty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...or can

> afford to go private....


Oh come now nutty, this is for readers of The Times.


I think it's brilliant that we have something like Dulwich and Sydenham Woods right here in zone 2.

I like living here - I like the places and the people - I like saying good morning to total strangers and I appreciate the community feel


I don't understand why people who don't like living here don't just move?


I liked it here even when the schools quoted were in special measures

Curmudgeon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like living here - I like the places and the

> people - I like saying good morning to total

> strangers and I appreciate the community feel


I'm with Curmudgeon. It's a great place.


Now likely to face an influx of Times readers, which will ruin it, of course.

Mmmm... creatively written while looking through rose tinted glasses. Behind every great property page there is a great estate agent.


Of course it's the sort of thing the gullible lap up. The thoughts of women cycling up and down in all their flowery organic loveliness, and rosy cheeked children playing in all the open spaces is a great way to 'talk-up' buying a poky, over priced semi on a crowded Victorian street in a minor South East London suburb, with dodgy transport links. The journalistic equivalent to Harry & Paul's "I Saw You Coming".

Lazy smug hacks seem to constantly big up the hood. Then again, they are hardly likely to describe the place where their 3 bed semi with 40ft garden, loft conversion, period features and GCH ( Not tested )lies, as a crime ridden crack hellhole.


This however can make refreshing change from repetitive, off the shelf articles on glamping or shitty beach huts in Whitstable that these uninspired shitehawks usually churn out.

goose91 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I want to know what eater81 thinks about the

> piece.

>

>

> Eater81 was banned from the form for voicing his

> opinion on this piece.


xxxxxxxx


Registered and made a first post just to say that?


Strange :))

god, you people are appalling. so desperate to scribble down angst and spite. the paper was being nice about where we live for chrissake1 i live in east dulwich and I like it. and LL IS in se22. if you moaners don't like it here, clear off.none of us will miss you

Puzzled, I'm, um, puzzled by your response.


Reading through the thread there seems to be a mix of people saying they love it round here, people saying the article is a bit OTT and cynics suggesting it's all about property prices. The only real angst is from huncamunca and he's like that about everything. I expect eater81's post was pretty angsty and spiteful, but I didn't see it before it was deleted, so can't say for sure.


Seems a bit harsh to brand everyone as appaling and desperate...

ED is a great area there is no doubt about that and i do agree with annaj about the harshness of what was/is said but do also agree with puzzled too about it being a nice area and respect to him/her for just trying to look out for it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...