Jump to content

Recommended Posts

IF THE driver behind you is too close, indicate leisurely to your left and pull into the left hand lane when safe to do so. Let the impatient / quicker / tosser driver get past and continue driving, humming contentedly to Fleetwood Mac, knowing you have bigger battles to fight and more important things to worry about than petty and potentially dangerous acts of traffic vigilantism.

Waynetta you are funny! I can't stand the majority of London drivers, everyone is in such a hurry and noone lets you out of a side road or says thankyou when you let them pass. I must say whenever I have had an issue with another driver it's always a man. I love to watch them in my rear view mirror, tempers boiling over as I slow down to stop them trying to overtake me, not on a motorway but on a normal road.


I still don't understand what the fuss is about with hogging the middle lane, everyone else does it, surely the slow lane is for under confident drivers doing less than the speed limit but the other two lanes you can use at your leisure not exceeding 70mph. Anyone doing over the speed limit is usually the type driving too close to the car in front putting other drivers in danger.

>IF THE driver behind you is too close, simply pull on the handbrake. This will not activate your brakelights and he will >have no warning that you are about to stop. Watch his face in your rear view mirror as his car slams into the back of you.


Especially good if it is a truck - his face is likely to be the last thing you see.

surely the slow lane is for under confident drivers doing less than the speed limit


Err NO..as someone said above READ the highway code (unless of course you are trolling). If you don't know that rule goodness knows what other rules of the road you ignore which makes you an usafe driver I'm afraid.

expat: I have no intention in reading the highway code, I found it boring studying it the first time so won't be doing it again.


I am not an unsafe driver. I never been involved in a accident, not even a minor one in all my years in driving and I know the highway code...ok all except the section on motorways! Perhaps I will google that rule now.

DJ....you cycle don't you? You can have an opinion on anything you want but an informed opinion would be good sometimes. The highway code I'm pretty sure states the speed limit on a motorway is 70 mph. If someone is doing that safely in the middle lane,what exactly is the problem?

felt-tip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the problem is that middle lane hoggers

> feel quite righteous about the fact they are

> 'enforcing' the speed limit even though their

> actions make motorways more dangerous and alot

> more congested.


I don't use motorways often but usually the inside lane is too slow and the outside lane is too fast. If there is a lack of traffic I'd always choose the inside lane as it feels safer.However to accuse people in the middle lane as being 'hoggers' suggests to me that you prefer to break the speed limit in the middle lane.Maybe there is less likelihood of you being caught as there is always some idiot going faster on the outside lane.

Narnia - if the inside is too busy and too slow for you to be in it then by all means stay in the middle lane - you are after all overtaking.


It is when the inside lane is by and large empty and people in the middle lane are either driving at the same speed as the inside lane traffic (no overtaking) or there is no traffic to the left (again, no overtaking) that this middle lane hogging complaint relates to.


Whether compliance with this rule facilitates the crime of others driving at 71mph is the police's business and not the middle lane hoggers'.

A good time time to see that is when driving at night on motorways. The inside lane has little traffic but there's always someone staying in the middle lane. I even once saw a middle lane hogger on an empty motorway....I was in the inside lane and had to pull out to the outside lane to overtake him....idiots....

felt-tip Yesterday, 08:24PM :

"It is when the inside lane is by and large empty and people in the middle lane are either driving at the same speed as the inside lane traffic (no overtaking) or there is no traffic to the left (again, no overtaking) that this middle lane hogging complaint relates to. "


Exactly. We all use the middle lane at some point, but to cruise along irrespective of the speed of the left-lane is ignoring that there's a whole community of road users around you. If you're going same speed or slower than the left-lane then move aside.

No Narnia I don't agree with that (and nor does the highway code). If the nearside lane has space you use that, with the middle lane for overtaking only. If the nearside lane is extremely busy, as it might be with lorries and other vehicles limited by law to lower speeds (with small gaps between vehichles), then you stay in the middle lane until such time as reasonable space becomes available in the nearside lane. That is a totally different attitude to thinking 'sitting in the middle lane no matter what' is ok.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello. Would you like a sofa bed? We have one to give away…photos attached. The scatter cushions are not included.
    • Complaint submitted.  Your helpful link took me straight to the relevant page. 🙏
    • I spend a riddiculous amount of time at the PO.  Every day.  I watch and I watch closely.  Returns take seconds.  The wait might be long but the scan takes a second.  The only thing that slows down a return is people scrolling through their phones looking for QR codes. Business customers like me take seconds.  I might have up to 2 bags of boxes but every one is perfectly packaged and pre-paid.  It just needs a scan.  Seconds. For customers like me and for returns customers they could just put in a self-service check out and we would all be in and out in minutes.  Quicker than M&S.   Or, have a dedicated window for scanning and nothing else.  No facility to handle money at that window so nobody is tempted to ask for a service other than scanning.  That would get the queues down instantly. It is the people picking up things that backs up the queue.  The branch is not equipped to provide the service.  Next time you're in the branch take a look at the shelf space immediately behind the servers.  A few stacking shelves.  That's all the space they have.  Everything else is on the floor in a mess.  I take on board what someone said about the private delivery companies not delivering to Peckham and I didn't know that.   The biggest time wasting service of all is Parcelforce.  If someone in front of me asks for Parcelforce I want to cry.  Long, long, forms need to be filled out by hand, in triplicate.  It is Dickensian.   Please consider taking a few minutes to fill out an online complaint (link below).  I honestly believe that an influx of complaints might make a difference.  I don't want to demoralise the staff or anything sinister but the PO needs to see that the branch is broken. https://www.postoffice.co.uk/contact-us/in-branch-customer-experience    
    • Couldn't agree more with the frustration. I avoid it like the plague but made the mistake of picking up a parcel a couple of months ago and it took them 20 minutes to find it. This was after queuing for an hour. All the pickup parcels were just in a massive heap with no order or organisation so they manually had to search for everything. Bizarre and deeply annoying as if run well it could be a good asset to the Post Office and of course the community. Also, very much agree with the point re not taking it out on counter staff as it must be a terrible and demoralising environment to work in.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...