Jump to content

Recommended Posts

IF THE driver behind you is too close, indicate leisurely to your left and pull into the left hand lane when safe to do so. Let the impatient / quicker / tosser driver get past and continue driving, humming contentedly to Fleetwood Mac, knowing you have bigger battles to fight and more important things to worry about than petty and potentially dangerous acts of traffic vigilantism.

Waynetta you are funny! I can't stand the majority of London drivers, everyone is in such a hurry and noone lets you out of a side road or says thankyou when you let them pass. I must say whenever I have had an issue with another driver it's always a man. I love to watch them in my rear view mirror, tempers boiling over as I slow down to stop them trying to overtake me, not on a motorway but on a normal road.


I still don't understand what the fuss is about with hogging the middle lane, everyone else does it, surely the slow lane is for under confident drivers doing less than the speed limit but the other two lanes you can use at your leisure not exceeding 70mph. Anyone doing over the speed limit is usually the type driving too close to the car in front putting other drivers in danger.

>IF THE driver behind you is too close, simply pull on the handbrake. This will not activate your brakelights and he will >have no warning that you are about to stop. Watch his face in your rear view mirror as his car slams into the back of you.


Especially good if it is a truck - his face is likely to be the last thing you see.

surely the slow lane is for under confident drivers doing less than the speed limit


Err NO..as someone said above READ the highway code (unless of course you are trolling). If you don't know that rule goodness knows what other rules of the road you ignore which makes you an usafe driver I'm afraid.

expat: I have no intention in reading the highway code, I found it boring studying it the first time so won't be doing it again.


I am not an unsafe driver. I never been involved in a accident, not even a minor one in all my years in driving and I know the highway code...ok all except the section on motorways! Perhaps I will google that rule now.

DJ....you cycle don't you? You can have an opinion on anything you want but an informed opinion would be good sometimes. The highway code I'm pretty sure states the speed limit on a motorway is 70 mph. If someone is doing that safely in the middle lane,what exactly is the problem?

felt-tip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the problem is that middle lane hoggers

> feel quite righteous about the fact they are

> 'enforcing' the speed limit even though their

> actions make motorways more dangerous and alot

> more congested.


I don't use motorways often but usually the inside lane is too slow and the outside lane is too fast. If there is a lack of traffic I'd always choose the inside lane as it feels safer.However to accuse people in the middle lane as being 'hoggers' suggests to me that you prefer to break the speed limit in the middle lane.Maybe there is less likelihood of you being caught as there is always some idiot going faster on the outside lane.

Narnia - if the inside is too busy and too slow for you to be in it then by all means stay in the middle lane - you are after all overtaking.


It is when the inside lane is by and large empty and people in the middle lane are either driving at the same speed as the inside lane traffic (no overtaking) or there is no traffic to the left (again, no overtaking) that this middle lane hogging complaint relates to.


Whether compliance with this rule facilitates the crime of others driving at 71mph is the police's business and not the middle lane hoggers'.

A good time time to see that is when driving at night on motorways. The inside lane has little traffic but there's always someone staying in the middle lane. I even once saw a middle lane hogger on an empty motorway....I was in the inside lane and had to pull out to the outside lane to overtake him....idiots....

felt-tip Yesterday, 08:24PM :

"It is when the inside lane is by and large empty and people in the middle lane are either driving at the same speed as the inside lane traffic (no overtaking) or there is no traffic to the left (again, no overtaking) that this middle lane hogging complaint relates to. "


Exactly. We all use the middle lane at some point, but to cruise along irrespective of the speed of the left-lane is ignoring that there's a whole community of road users around you. If you're going same speed or slower than the left-lane then move aside.

No Narnia I don't agree with that (and nor does the highway code). If the nearside lane has space you use that, with the middle lane for overtaking only. If the nearside lane is extremely busy, as it might be with lorries and other vehicles limited by law to lower speeds (with small gaps between vehichles), then you stay in the middle lane until such time as reasonable space becomes available in the nearside lane. That is a totally different attitude to thinking 'sitting in the middle lane no matter what' is ok.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...