Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is it just me, or is this campaign by the council to encourage recycling a touch over the top?


First I was amazed at the leaflet that came round last month with the "We can do this the easy way" or "We can do this the hard way" message.


And THEN at 08.37 this morning a leaflet was put through my door which said " We notice your blue bag/box was not presented today" followed by other stuff and ending with "you may be fined ?75 if you do not recycle".


This was delivered, hours before the recycling collection people came. I was incensed. I am an avid recycler and composter. In fact the person who delivered this note this morning had had to move the brown bin in order to get past it to get to the door.


I rang the council and left a resonably polite message saying that I really feel that the tone of their recycling leaflets is not good.


Thanks for the opportunity to rant.


Angry of East Dulwich

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1410-heavy-handed-recycling-policy/
Share on other sites

We had the same thing but with a letter addressed to us personally saying they had checked us on several occasions and found us not to be recycling. We always recycle, in fact only the week before I had hounded southwark enviromental services because they had missed our collection. I can only think that in our case that they're not looking by our side gate where we have been told to leave the refuse/recycling. we've also tried to call the helpline number to complain but have been told that they are experiencing high call volumes and will call back before the 24th September.

I was hopping mad about it yesterday but have chilled out somewhat today...

chuff

You can always get your own back by demanding a collection service to recycle the old highly toxic, mercury filled, eco-bulbs that they give away to everyone. They don't seem to be aware of how toxic these bulbs are how they should be disposed of.

>>And THEN at 08.37 this morning a leaflet was put through my door which said " We notice your blue bag/box was not >>presented today" followed by other stuff and ending with "you may be fined ?75 if you do not recycle".


>>This was delivered, hours before the recycling collection people came. I was incensed. I am an avid recycler and >>composter. In <<


Then their leaflet was unquestionably a libel and perhaps you should write back pointing this out, and promising to pass on any similarly libellous literature to your solicitor....The leaflet was not inside a window envelope I suppose? :))

Is everyone getting this? I've not had anyting yet (although I do recycle and leave my box full of beer cans and wine bottles outside the house at all times).


Have they the power to fine? Is a bye law passed stating that we must recycle?


What if I do all my recycling at Sainsburys which is next door to my house? How do they know this?


Sounds like a load of BS to me!

Yes. Start buying stuff, you filthy non-consumerist. ;)


I haven't had any of these leaflets yet, and like ratty our recycling also lives outside in full view. If that is the criteria* they're using when they decide weather or not to leaflet a house then it's a pretty shabby one.



* criterion? can I be bothered to properly singularise? hmm...

ratty Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------->

> Have they the power to fine? Is a bye law passed

> stating that we must recycle?


Short answer is yes, they can require that you recycle. However, they can't fine you if you don't have any recycling to put out, or if you recycle it elsewhere.


The longer answer is that the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (as amended by the London Local Authorities Act 2007) gives local authorities the power to specify how people separate their waste, e.g. which bin it should be placed in as well as which days it will be collected. It also provides for fixed penalty charges if people breach certain provisions of the Act. One of the sections you can be fined for breaching is section 46 (thrillingly entitled "Receptacles for Household Waste").


Section 46 allows Southwark to require us to use separate containers for recyclable waste, subject to certain conditions such as the number of containers and requirements for separation of waste must be reasonable. If you breach this section, for example by mixing recyclable and non-recyclable waste, you could in theory be liable to a penalty charge. However, if you don't have any recycling to put out, or recycle elsewhere, the penalty charge certainly couldn't apply.


There has been huge amount of discussion about how Councils should use these powers. Councils say the threat of fines are essential to get through to those people who do no recyling at all. However, there are very limited guidelines as to how these powers should be applied, and a wide variation in practice between councils. See the various news stories about on the spot littering for a similar discussion.


I have no connection to Southwark Council by the way, but take a keen personal and professional interest in civil liberties, if I can put it like that. This is a good example of the type of regulation that simply didn't exist 10 years ago, where there is potential for summary conviction, no requirement for a common sense application and only limited grounds for appeal.

One thing I forgot to mention, in fairness to Southwark Council, is that part of the reason they may be being a bit heavy handed, is that their waste management strategy doesn't involve building a big old incinerator to treat waste, as a number of councils are.


The strategy only works, however, if Southwark hit fairly ambitious targets for recycling. If they were being a bit more relaxed about the recyling and going down the incinerator route, I suspect people would be just as aggravated for different reasons.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>And THEN at 08.37 this morning a leaflet was put

> through my door which said " We notice your blue

> bag/box was not >>presented today" followed by

> other stuff and ending with "you may be fined ?75

> if you do not recycle".

>

> >>This was delivered, hours before the recycling

> collection people came. I was incensed. I am an

> avid recycler and >>composter. In

> Then their leaflet was unquestionably a libel and

> perhaps you should write back pointing this out,

> and promising to pass on any similarly libellous

> literature to your solicitor....The leaflet was

> not inside a window envelope I suppose? :))


Um, what?



Charlie

Few weeks ago we have had our brown bin and our blue bag nicked. We are still waiting for the council to replace them. They were supposed to deliver them early last week but they haven't turned up yet.


So until they get replaced there is a bit of a dilemma as it seems the recycling collection people won't take things if they are not in the dedicated container -- should we be stop recycling until we get provided the right containers?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would recommend Lucasz - he responded to our request very quickly, gave us an excellent quote and cleaned up after himself. Will definitely ask him to do any future jobs. 
    • General view is it is tokenistic from Iran, not looking to harm life but show that they are retaliating. Same thing happened after the earlier Israeli attack back in the distant part. There will be debate, even at the top of the Iranian authorities.  Israel even without the US hold the cards.  Although are in this position due to decades of US support. As per my post on the other thread much of the reason the world is in this position is botched US post second world war middle East policy.  Supporting both sides in the Iran/Iraq war being particularly striking Trump mark 1 emboldened the right wing in Israel, perhaps pushed Hammas to more extreme action, and led to the Iranians going rogue on nukes.  I think that the latter was to put them in a stronger position in opening up grade, a country not able to sell vast quantities of oil ,(and gas?) But how does the world move on from this mess? By all means give other views to my simplistic ones   
    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.     If anything, it draws Qatar into the dialogue and Q will privately be urging Iran to back down. 
    • If the Qatari's decide to retaliate then it's all going off...but I suspect the Iranians are hoping for this - one inaccurate missile and the Qatari's may have to. I think the Iranian leadership is working on fast-tracking their own demise and the Americans and Israeli's planning for regime change, maybe with the many political prisoners the Israelis tried to free from the Elvin prison today. What a mess but clearly Iran was becoming a big threat to not only Israel but many of the other Gulf States and was clearly doing scary stuff with nuclear weapons that required action.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...