Jump to content

?600 billion to leave EU? What does EU membership really cost?


Recommended Posts

Just been watching slimy Nick Clegg talking at the Brexit debate and it reminded me.


Last night on Newsnight Evan Davis interviewed Guy verhofstadt who will be a player in Brexit negotiations. Evan asked him about the sum of ?60 Billion the UK has commitments to pay the EU by the time we leave.


Guy replied that current and future commitments by the time the UK leaves will be ?600 Billion. Evan Davis didn't pick him up on this and I haven't seen anything in the papers or on the news about it.


Was this a mistake by Guy? A Freudian slip?


The UK, rightly, will honour all its commitments. However, why should UK taxpayers keep paying the likes of Clegg's, and that great socialist family the Kinnocks', EU pensions among other things?


The UK ought to say (politely) after the two years we will off-set any payments against the costs to UK companies of any tariffs imposed on our goods and services.


(Newsnight, Jan 30, around 37 mins)

What is a bit worrying about this ?600 Billion figure, if true, is that UK taxpayers appear to have been misled as to the true cost of membership of the EU.


If we assume our net contribution (allowing for the abatement) is around ?8.5 Billion a year for 2017,18 and 19 that's ?25.5 Billion. So what is the outstanding ?574.5 Billion for?


Is there something Remainers would like to fess up to?

I got my tax breakdown last year. I paid ?88 to the EU. Less than I paid for anything else. A fifth if what I soent on defence. A tenth of what I spent on state pensions and education. A 20th of what I spent on welfare. And a full 1500 quid less than I spent on health.


Seems lime a bargain to me.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's find out the real facts, not the speculative

> #AltFacts and discuss them.

>

> Else we're back to asking 'where's the ?350

> squillion Scot the NHS then?"

>

> And then .....you know the form!



I agree. The figure might have been a slip of the tongue by a non-native speaker although he spoke fluently.


If such a figure were to be the EU's opening gambit in the forthcoming negotiations I'll look forward to how the FT and the Economist break it down.

keano77 Wrote:


>

> Guy replied that current and future commitments by

> the time the UK leaves will be ?600 Billion. Evan

> Davis didn't pick him up on this and I haven't

> seen anything in the papers or on the news about

> it.


What he said in the interview was that this was the implied cost of leaving, not the cost of 'being in'. Those two things are not at all the same (for a start they would refer to different time horizons).


These are highly technical issues. We know what the net annual cost of being in the EU is because we have been paying it (after rebates) for years. It was for that reason we (well, I know not quite all of us) knew that the lies about the ?350m per week we would gain for the NHS were lies and not truth.

Sorry jaywalker, doesn't wash with me.


He might have said implied cost of leaving and there might well be highly technical issues to be resolved. But if the net annual cost of membership is approx ?8.5Billion and we leave by 2020 how could we still owe some ?550 Billion?


Now I realise we probably have agreements on defence, intelligence, green commitments etc that will no doubt continue. However, if Verhofstadt's ?600 Billion includes such matters the true cost of membership is significantly more than what we think we've been paying.


You'll have to do better than that Jaywalker

er, like I said, because the cost of leaving is not the same as the cost of staying in?


For example, you might say, it only costs me ?100 a year to stay in this house (insurance, council tax) but to leave it will cost me ?1000 (lawyers fees).


You are trying to create an equivalence where none exists.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If we assume our net contribution (allowing for

> the abatement) is around ?8.5 Billion a year for

> 2017,18 and 19 that's ?25.5 Billion. So what is

> the outstanding ?574.5 Billion for?


I doubt it will be ?600m, but if you think Brexit will only cost the remaining years' contributions, you're in for a big surprise.

But here we're saying it costs us ?8.5Billion a year to stay in and enjoy the benefits but if we leave it will cost the equivalent of 70.5 years membership with no single market access and tariffs to boot.


Okay, I don't expect you to know the answer Jaywalker and I realise it's probably an inflated figure to start the negotiations with. We'll have to wait until they reveal their hand.

I paid the equivalent of one Walnut Whip every week from the time of the announcement that we would be host city for London 2012.


People whinged and moaned. It was great. It was always going to be great.


Not even that bothered of some of the legacy promises that were not fulfilled. Except the use for the ammers.


I'm sure that the comparison with the Walnut Whip was not alt/fake news. Other items of confectionary are available.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We'll that's better. Obviously a mistake by the

> lead Brexit negotiator for the European

> Parliament. Interesting that the video on the BBC

> website doesn't carry that bit.


That's funny Keano, there's us discussion discount in the billions, as if we're paying it ourselves


Oh.....hang on a minute


How many Walnut Whips is that?

The EU desk jockies are going to try and squeeze as much out of us as possible but since the EU budget has never been ratified how can they accurately calculate it. Also we have only been in it since 1973 (De Gaulle blocked us for 14 years!) unlike founder countries

The cost of the gravy train and its pension fund is sickening.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/13/brexit-britain-cost-divorce-bill-questions-answered-uk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...