Jump to content

Recommended Posts

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I am sure that can find conspiracy sites

> where the UK is bending over backwards to

> accommodate Russian interests too. Which we are.



Go on then. Not sure what it has to do with Trump though?

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> malumbu Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue, I am sure that can find conspiracy sites

> > where the UK is bending over backwards to

> > accommodate Russian interests too. Which we

> are.

>

>

> Go on then. Not sure what it has to do with Trump

> though?


I give you Owen Jones :)


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/12/tory-links-russia-saudi-links-corbyn-spy-extremism


But it's nothing to do with Trump except the perhaps same Russian people trying to control Western interests.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I am sure that can find conspiracy sites

> where the UK is bending over backwards to

> accommodate Russian interests too. Which we are.



That isn't the point, is it?


And to the best of my knowledge the site I linked to is not a "conspiracy site."

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

ExtremeEntertainment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you wont get much of an opinion oh here there

> mostly libraels or feminists. and we all know

> there trump haters.



If you?re going to be annoyed at people who disagree with you at least be original about it...yawn...


By the way, huge tranches of the American right-wing (hardly bastions of liberalism - awhaywver you think that is - or feminism) really hate Trump. But then that doesn?t chime with your world-view so you just dismiss anything you don?t like as lies.

ExtremeEntertainment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you wont get much of an opinion oh here there

> mostly libraels or feminists. and we all know

> there trump haters.


Nine grammatical and spelling errors in eighteen words, hats off to you!

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Meanwhile most important news of the day ..

>

> "US President Donald Trump has faced ridicule

> online after he was filmed boarding Air Force One

> with what appears to be a length of toilet tissue

> attached to his shoe."



Well, appropriate, as he is a shit.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I only count eight, but your point stands.

>

> Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> conjunction?



I thought of that one - but Jerusalem :)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I only count eight, but your point stands.

>

> Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> conjunction?


Ah. Indeed. My old GCSE English teacher would be howling at me now.


(The A Level teachers wouldn?t have cared at all!)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I only count eight, but your point stands.

>

> Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> conjunction?



It can be perfectly acceptable to start a sentence with the conjunction ?and? these days despite what I was taught at school. My bugbear is the current trend for many people being interviewed to start their answer to a question with the stabiliser ?so?.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JoeLeg Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I only count eight, but your point stands.

> >

> > Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> > conjunction?

>

>

> It can be perfectly acceptable to start a sentence

> with the conjunction ?and? these days despite what

> I was taught at school. My bugbear is the current

> trend for many people being interviewed to start

> their answer to a question with the stabiliser

> ?so?.


Correction, some people think it's acceptable to start a sentence with a conjunction. It has become accepted through frequent (mis)use - just as starting an answer with "so" will doubtless become, will you then regard it as acceptable once it has become normalised?

Would you buy a chlorinated chicken off this man ?


"Donald Trump has said he believes Russian leader Vladimir Putin is ?probably? behind a recent spate of poisonings and assassinations ? but appeared to suggest they were not relevant because they did not happen in the US."

keano77 Wrote:

-

> >

> > Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> > conjunction?

>

>

> It can be perfectly acceptable to start a sentence

> with the conjunction ?and? these days despite what

> I was taught at school. My bugbear is the current

> trend for many people being interviewed to start

> their answer to a question with the stabiliser

> ?so?.



Language changes, otherwise we'd all still be speaking and writing like Chaucer (assuming he spoke like he wrote :)) ) or in fact, going back to the mists of time, just sort of burbling :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another recommendation - excellent, fast work. 
    • I appealed against a fine issued by Southwark, and won. The adjudicator was businesslike, but also mentioned that several cases had come to him caught out by the same confusing signage.    Is there any other parking that could reasonably have been used? Does the shop advise where to park?  It sounds as though the time in the bay was a reasonable use. Even if you lose, I doubt that Southwark can increase the original charge. If you are going to appeal, don't delay. Take pictures of the scene if you think that might help, also provide the weight of the goods if that supports your case.
    • Thanks - an overnight stay,  a drip and painkillers seems to have done its work!
    • Depends on who can afford to purchase or lease it and what The Dulwich Estate, Stonegate and Southwark Council will allow to be built or operate on the site. Whatever it is, it needs to attract footfall for itself and businesses around it. The question to ask is what does that part of Dulwich need, that is not within the locality, which will attract custom and footfall, that the site can accommodate and that can offer parking which it already has available. In between Cox's Walk, Dulwich Village, Dulwich College and the park, some sort of establishment that sells drinks and meals. Bit then I'm just chucking ideas around, or maybe someone, Dean, has some radical idea's to take it in a totally different direction.    Whatever it becomes it has to be better than the rotting site and eyesore it currently is. Good luck to anyone who takes on the project to redevelop the former Grove Tavern. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...