Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What a thankless job local road planning has.


The second that traffic calming is formally proposed this thread will be choc-a-bloc with motorists screaming about damage to their vehicles, and residents squealing about either the damage to their foundations caused by lorries and humps, or the lack of parking space created by chicanes.


Even for sight-lines at junctions, an expanded pavement will give you a massive outcry about the consequences on parking space.


Talk about a no win.

Here's my traffic calming solution, that doesn't involve speed humps or cameras, or much cash:


Give Underhill and Upland Roads priority over Barry Road, making Barry Road motorists give way onto these quieter routes, splitting Barry into three shorter, slower sections.

skidmarks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I still say taking the centre line road marking

> out will give the illusion of a narrower road and

> slow drivers, as we did here. Even if it didn't

> work it would only cost the day rate of a line

> marking team of ?500.

>

> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en

> &geocode=&q=Forest+Row&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&ssp

> n=18.231357,39.331055&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Forest+Row

> ,+East+Sussex,+United+Kingdom&ll=51.09388,0.052244

> &spn=0,0.009602&z=17&layer=c&cbll=51.09388,0.05224

> 4&panoid=dWFgNqVyBXxzE2sBhh8lJg&cbp=12,280.17,,0,7

> .92


That's a proven calming method, like red tarmac (but cheaper)

What you all forget is that Barry Raod is a B road..and as such can not have certain traffic calming or changed priority measures. For example road humps can not be installed on B roads, so forget asking the council for that - they can't do it by law.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No speed humps at the top end by the Plough or

> anywhere else on Barry Rd .

_______________________________________________________


There is a 'raised' pedestrian crossing on Peckham Rye

which is effectively a speed bump.. Could they not do that

to the pedestrian crossing on Barry road junction in question.


I am of course assuming Peckham Rye is also classified as a 'B' road?

As I said before im not a great lover of speed humps on a road like this.I think with at least three nasty colisions in three months we have a problem. And its mainly speed related. I would like to see two speed cameras and some raised areas near the junctions. But all this will cost ???? which is not available in this current climate and weather they would prioritise Barry rd, there are probably much worse roads that are more dangerous and have had fatalities.

This is my motto: Driving is a team game where everybody is responsible for each others safety on the road.

I live on Barry Road and frequently have to drive down as far as Upland to get to work if I cannot turn right at my house to go via LL. Twice in this past week have been driving down between 20 -25 mph as could see people about to cross at the pedestrian crossing, and also bendy 12's on both sides of road when some pratt decides to overtake me, one bendy 12 and swerves in front of another car as misjudges the distance of the on coming 12.

Barry Road is a major bus route and TfL buses have and will object to more bumps and such traffic calming.

The raised entry treatments around Goodrich Road have caused much distress to some neighbouring properties due to vibrations which are notoriously hard to prove but are very real to the residents and of course once you notice them become insanely annoying.


Mini roundabouts cause other dangers and no guarantee that after such long straights people wont plough on through.


I think Skidmarks has made a really potentially valuable suggestion. Changing or removing road markings can dramatically change behaviours. So I'll ask council road officers for latest stats and whether we can meet on site to talk about options.

Skidmarks could you join us to talk about the example you've given?


The other problem is the active speed signs. Apparently the type installed there and on Friern Road are no longer maintainable. So changing them to the newer type that are is something I'll ask officers to investigate.

I think this thread has gone as far as it can go.Most of us are very concerned about the speed of some vehicles along this road including me. James Barber above is on the ball and seems to know what he is talking about.


The best thing we could do is speak to the local MP write to the council,make as much noise as possible and you never know.


The least they can do is to paint some decent stop/give way lines at the junction of Underhill that would be a start.


Good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
    • Their comms has been diabolical. The "son of a toolmaker" and "working people" soundbites may have placated an electorate before an election but they will come back to haunt you after it and will bite you hard if things don't go well.  If they don't improve things soon it is going to be a long parliament for them and there are no signs things are getting better. Amazing as they had 14 years to prepare for this but being in opposition is far, far easier than running a country.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...