Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So last night TwinII's nasty cough turned into horrible panting, never seen this before with any of my children but I could tell it was unusual (lying very lethargic, chest going rapily up and down, sucking in, nostrils flaring)


Called NHS direct who sent a paramedic... but when nebulisers didnt help we ended up in a blue light ambulance to hospital


after more nebulisers, oxygen and steroids she improved but we were there till past 1am being monitored.... finally got home at 2am, she has an inhaler, steroids to take and antibiotics and we have to go back if she needs the inhaler too frequently


Tbey decided was a viral infection causing the wheeze on both sides, possibly will turn to be asthma... and all the crackling is likely to be a bacterial infection starting hence the antibiotics.


All the staff we saw were great and very kind. It;s not easy being in a and e alone at 1am heavily pregnant with a sick toddler.


There was another little boy there (also a twin) with exactly the same, so definitely something to watch out for. I had forgotten how good NHS direct can be, the way they decide over the phone what's necessary ad send an ambulance etc if needed.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13792-nhs-comes-up-trumps/
Share on other sites

What a horrible thing to go through, especially when heavily pregnant. Glad the NHS were helpful.


My friend went through this a few months ago with her 18 month old son. Turned out to be asthma with him, but runs in the family so they were half expecting it at some point.


Hope she is feeling all better soon.


Weird how there was another twin in at the same time. One twin is always smaller than the other when born are they not? What with fighting for space and stuff. Was twin II the smaller in your case?

They didn't say bronchiolitis (s that the word for viral infection of the bronchial tubes?) I think her narrowing and blockage was more lungs/pneumonia.


I am hoping it's not asthma... does run in the family bigtime but she hasn't had any chest problems before and DS1 once had an inhaler for a while after a chest infetion but never went on to develop asthma

in one hospital they called it bronchiolitis and pneumonia- when I queried it I recall one staff member shrugging and saying "well it's the same thing really"


(I had just got round to accepting the b word without bursting into tears- when they said pneumonia I nearly jumped out of my skin- over anxious teary first time mother :)))


think bronchitis is the bronchial tubes but bronchiolitis is the smaller ones inside the lung? mind you tis many many years since I did biology so I may well be barking up the wrong tree! Hope she gets better soon. How old is she?

One of mine suffers from recurrent croup (similar lung infection thingy - absolutely terrifying) and we've been down there a few times in a horrible rush, and I have to say the children's A&E at King's have been marvellous. Hurray for them (although boo for you Fuschia, you must be exhasusted).
I have to say I had also had a wonderful experience with the NHS when my 6 week old became ill (bronchiolitis). Different hospital (UCH), but they were amazing. I couldn't believe that just 6 weeks prior it was like I was in a war camp on the post-natal ward. I had doctors taking away my baby without asking for invasive proceedures....The contrast when I went to A&E and then on the paediatric ward couldn't have been more acute. The team was so helpful, lovely, let us stay over in the room on a bed etc, explained everything and made me feel like I had an opinion. Couldn't have been better. Anyway, hope your little one gets better soon x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was a marketing approach to get kids to do exactly the opposite.  ie watch the programme.  'Why don't you' was very progressive at the time.
    • I agree its good to have a conversation about what Lordship lane really needs and I feel we are doing that in this forum; and some trying to steer it away from what commerce needs (lordship lane) and toward what people need, particularly our future generations who are being left a fractured future and are responding with higher suicide rates and depression.  no doubt the world of profit will win, but that is why some of us wish to speak out even if in vain.   I agree with you that there may be some underage drink drugs but would we all prefer that to be done behind closed doors .... I think more dangerous actually.   I applaud your optimism that dulwich estates could consider a skatepark into Dulwich park, maybe, although it could have closing time, insurance, safety issues. It would be great if a developer wants to include a skatepark, but I wonder what he would gain from that in terms of his profit.  I would rather give the benefit of doubt to those who leave behind the empty digital world and bravely try something communal, generative, challenging.   In the 1970s a tv programme urged teenagers to  "turn off your TV set and do something less boring instead" only some families can afford clubs......        
    • Just gone passed Love Dulwich cafe on the bus and there’s a sign outside stating “new Turkish restaurant opening soon” - I know the owners are Turkish but are they converting it already? 
    • I was surprised to learn that East Dulwich Picturehouse now only screens PG-rated films for their baby-friendly showings, unlike other Picturehouse branches. Apparently, this change happened after a complaint to the council about showing films above a PG rating to infants. Afaik, this policy only applies to this  branch. As a local parent, I find this frustrating. It limits our options, especially when many of us would love the chance to watch a wider range of films while caring for our little ones. For example, during Oscar Week, only one vintage film is being shown. Are we really expected to only consume toddler-focused content, like Cocomelon? I also worry about the precedent this sets. If other institutions, like the Tate or the National Portrait Gallery, applied similar restrictions, parents could be left with only child-oriented content. Babies under one don’t fully comprehend adult themes, so shouldn’t there be more flexibility? I’d love to hear what others think—should this policy be reconsidered?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...