Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good neighbourly work. Bit concerned that description information may have been shared. Would that be considered to be corroborated evidence? Couldn't it affect the reliability of evidence? Perhaps someone in the know can inform. This thread for me highlights the importance of good neighbours, the importance of accurate descriptions when posting regarding perpetrators of crime, and personal safety issues. We can't stop the crimes, we can only do all we can to protect each other from injustice.
Thanks. No problem re posting descriptions. Both me and my neighbour gave descriptions to the police right from the start, independently, without each other's knowledge. Newspapers often give descriptions of perpetrators before they are found, which can lead to their arrest.
  • 3 weeks later...
Well, I can now announce an update to burglary in Oglander Road. He pleaded guilty in court yesterday and will be sentenced on 9 March. His name is Tesfa Amlak Jones (and yes, I'm allowed to say that as he has been convicted). The police told me my evidence helped convict him and they will tell me what he gets, so I'll let you know. However, don't all applaud at once, as the reason he was caught was due to an eagle-eyed resident of Pellatt Road who phoned the police while he was in a property there and he was caught in the act. He had also burgled several other properties in other roads that week. So for once, a result, and this particular spate of burglaries has been halted, until the next one...

Well done buddug for posting on here. Not a very pleasant experience when someone comes to your private home with bad intentions. Makes you feel vulnerable. So you have been incredibly kind and good spirited by posting on here. Be careful chasing people though, but I love your style. As for the comments, I have read the entire thread and the comment made to you after you kindly put out a warning was incredibly passive aggressive and arrogant, so again, well done you for standing up for yourself and well done to those that supported you. It was completely unnecessary to ask you in such a way why you hadn't called the police, instead of asking if you had. They are very different ways of expression. And I do not care if they started the forum or how popular they are, it was mean when you've been through such an unpleasant experience. And as for Sue...well!

Anyway, well done. Stay safe. And thank you for the warning my lovely xx

MistyBlue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And as for Sue...well!



As for Sue ... Well, what?


And what is your reason for rehashing the part of the thread which led to many comments being deleted by admin?


ETA: People can read the remaining comments and make up their own minds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...