Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I had the misfortune to be stuck in a queue on lordship lane recently behind a lady who was explaining very loudly to someone on her mobile phone that she'd had to take her child to a and e because her gp didnt know anything, she'd checked the symptoms on google and he was wrong.


The idiots at a and e didn't know anythimg either apparently.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This afternoon Jeremy Hunt told everyone to stop going to A&E (he thinks you're all hypochondriacs)


From today's Hansard, uncorrected version:


"This Government are committed to maintaining and delivering that vital four-hour commitment to patients, but since it was announced in 2000, there are nearly 9 million more visits to our A&Es, up to 30% of which NHS England estimates do not need to be made, and the tide is continuing to rise. If we are going to protect our four-hour standard, we need to be clear that it is a promise to sort out all urgent health problems within four hours, but not all health problems, however minor. As Professor Keith Willett, NHS England?s medical director for acute care, has said, no country in the world has a standard for all health problems, however small, and if we are to protect services for the most vulnerable, nor can we." https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-01-09/debates/A0C1CB51-3E77-4FD0-87D9-AD36C2C11CE5/MentalHealthAndNHSPerformance

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People do go to A&E who do not need to.


and if he keeps going on about it there is a danger that people who need to won't. health care has always to balance type 1 and type 2 errors of this sort: there is no optimum (unless everyone is to take a medical degree and get years of further experience). As with juries, better that everyone goes to a and e with a wrong self-diagnosis (letting people off who did it) than that people with need of treatment stay at home (the innocent being convicted). a good principle for both juries and triage.


I wonder if the Prime Minister has even the first idea about mental health. I think not. She is going to train teachers to spot it - well, good luck - and provide more internet advice for those who think they may have a problem - er, right! And this is worth headline policy news??


And to be clear in response to ianr, if you were in charge of the health service you would put in place pre-triage at all a and e sites, no? e.g. a GP on duty at each site all the time. But they haven't have they? So they want a standard for something "vital" but are too incompetent to provide its resolution without blaming the people who think they may need treatment. Dear God.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had the misfortune to be stuck in a queue on

> lordship lane recently behind a lady who was

> explaining very loudly to someone on her mobile

> phone that she'd had to take her child to a and e

> because her gp didnt know anything, she'd checked

> the symptoms on google and he was wrong.

>

> The idiots at a and e didn't know anythimg either

> apparently.


Any your an idiot too. How dare you criticise people working to look after your health and well-being. You are an even bigger hunt than Hunt.

There seem to be two types of people those who will go and those who avoid going

(I got told my kidneys were so dehydrated I'd come close to damaging them once

after turning up for what turned out to be an emergency (adhesions which caused a

total blockage)).


But Hunt tends to be rather nasty sometimes (like today) - wonder if he's actually

playing bad cop. Anyway after treating the public like children someone explained

that what he was trying to say was that if you are not an emergency don't expect to

be treated in 4 hours (triage tell I suppose),

Bit of the wrong end of the stick there malumbu, I think...


Having spent far too much time in A&E with broken bones (rugby and motorcycles, ah happy days of youth!) and latterly being sent there by GPs with other nonsense (ah, miserable days of middle age!), yes of course some people go to A&E with stupid complaints. Once sat there all night with a broken wrist while a girl was admitted before me with what turned out to be period pains...but there are two things which could be done, first of all better triage to winnow out the timewasters, and secondly better GP provision so people didn't go there in a panic (the aforementioned girl's mother was worried she might have appendicitis and couldn't get a GP appointment) when they have nowhere else to turn. Stupid Hunt (yes that is rhyming slang) would only have a right to castigate A&E "timewasters" if non-emergency provision was up to scratch, which it can't be when the government are operating a slash and burn policy on the NHS.


Just for the record, from long experience, the A&E staff at King's are the most wonderful, long suffering, patient and dedicated people I've ever come across. If any of you happen to be on this forum, thank you.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Abe_froeman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I had the misfortune to be stuck in a queue on

> > lordship lane recently behind a lady who was

> > explaining very loudly to someone on her mobile

> > phone that she'd had to take her child to a and

> e

> > because her gp didnt know anything, she'd

> checked

> > the symptoms on google and he was wrong.

> >

> > The idiots at a and e didn't know anythimg

> either

> > apparently.

>

> Any your an idiot too. How dare you criticise

> people working to look after your health and

> well-being. You are an even bigger hunt than

> Hunt.


Oh dear, malambu. You've made yourself look a bit Jeremy Huntish there!

Totally agree rendel, the GP service is a shambles. When people phone their GP with a legitimate complaint, only to be told that there are no available appointments, period (no pun intended)... I cannot really blame people for turning to A&E.


And yes, the triage process could filter out the people who don't need hospital treatment, maybe refer them to a pharmacist, etc.

Some hospitals have this system....Princess Royal down between Bromley and Orpington (run by King's) has a triage system that either sends you into A & E if it is serious, or into Urgent Care which is run by GPs if it's not so serious.

I still had to wait four hours in A&E though!

Another good point Otta, more drop-in centres would really ease the load on A&E.


There's one in New Cross, which has been really useful a few times. Unfortunately the Lister Centre in Peckham stopped doing drop-ins a while ago - although I think you can ask your GP to refer you there if they have nothing available.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Totally agree rendel, the GP service is a

> shambles. When people phone their GP with a

> legitimate complaint, only to be told that there

> are no available appointments, period (no pun

> intended)... I cannot really blame people for

> turning to A&E.

>

> And yes, the triage process could filter out the

> people who don't need hospital treatment, maybe

> refer them to a pharmacist, etc.



Couldn't agree more.


I manage my asthma well, but at times I need to be seen pretty pronto. Things like high pollen count can hit me, maiking my meds run out quick, or the need for steriods/antibiotics. To be offered something 'next week' isn't helpful.


So i've resorted to using Beckhanam beacon, and buying my ventolin inhalers from the pharmacist. And on occasions i've been to A&E. But in practice that shouldn't happen, I feel like i'm wasting their time, not that they ever say so.


A few years ago this wasn't the case. The upside of late is my local surgery has just employed an Asthma nurse, and i've been invited to an "Asthma coffee morning" which should be a wheeze.


So some hope is on the horizon, in Sydenham anyway

If you go to A and E they give you free pills (they gave me free Ibuprofen for a knee injury once) If you go to the GP or the pharmacy (who WILL sell you something regardless- I tested them out once) it costs you money. Also if you are not entitled the GP won't see you but the A and E will treat you....

I wonder if the NHS is actually in greater crisis than even cynics like me ever thought possible.


Really, how can one have a clue unless you know someone who works there? Any patient is a particular - of no significance to the general pattern: they may or may not get quick and good treatment. But if you know someone who is tearing their hair out because they cannot provide the treatment they were trained to give, that there is a complete failure of management ...


It looks from leaks today that the government is entirely aware of the situation; I guess we will eventually call them to account ...


This is another catastrophe on the horizon from a forthcoming 'crackdown on immigration' so we can get 'our country back' and return to 'the way we used to live' without the labour we need to help an ageing population.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...