Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Charity shop donations and dumping-


I am volunteer in the Hospice shop.


The first point is correct that if people only dumped stuff when shop is open.


You can never stop it and all sorts of people have a sort through? Some a shops next door like the flower take stuff in for and save it for us. Some people do pop money in the letterbox if they take something.


The most annoying part is people just leave stuff thrown all over the place once they have had their fill. What we need is tidy people to help themseveles. The other prospect is that if it has been raining and all the bags have been soaked is not much fun or if a dog has been by and pissed over the left donations.



Couple of general points about donations is this shop is very small and limited for help and safety reasons can only take so many donations at one time. Also it is not open as long as the Mind shops. The fact is we have to pay for the rubbish to be taken away and sadly many donations actuary do fall into the rubbish category. When we turn those nice charity minded people away with their donations because we are full. The abuse received is much the same as the lady who stopped and asked about why this person took the clothes from outside a charity shop. Volunteers being abused by the public because we can?t take donations is not nice! Also for example we now getting hundreds of old videos as people clear them out and it has got to the point where we will now refuse large donations of videos because in finical terms they are just not worth the effort.


Perhaps we need an international dump for videos to be sent to other parts of the world. This is already being done with clothing. This is wider issue about recycling and waste management but this country like in many other social responsible areas is way down the bottom of league.

Leon,


I always thought there was a market for "rags" that charities could make use of, which is why I've never been too choosy about what goes into the charity shop bag. Obviously that was mistaken. As someone who lobs things your way occasionally, what are the best things to drop off?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...