Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a 2 year old and a 5 year old. They have all-seasons duvets so i can swap them from a thin one in summer. to a thicker one in autumn and then put them both together if it gets really cold. Think they're 4.5 tog and 9 tog. Currently got the 9 tog on and its about right as our heating isn't on at all yet.


My mum is a bit of a duvet expert and always swears by fogarty. Debenhams have a sale section where you can usually pick up some bargains. Think I got ours at half price.

Think Ikea do a good childrens duvet if you can bear going to get it?


Our eldest (now 6) has always been a really hot sleeper - regularly bathed in sweat when I go to check on her at 10/11pm, no matter what the time of year, so I've always gone for a light duvet for her, and she has a blanket which can be added if required. I think most children tend to be quite warm at night don't they? Or is my girl a bit odd?!


Molly

The Nappy Lady Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think most children tend to be quite

> warm at night don't they? Or is my girl a bit

> odd?!

>

My daughter is exactly the same - sleeps completely naked and has done for some time now - she has a 4.5tog duvet which unless its chilly ends on getting kicked off too - think her body temperature is set to Northern, just like her Mammy ;)....

This is digressing slightly but I have a good tip for stopping duvets getting kicked off when they are little. A friend suggested it and it works brilliantly. Put the duvet widthways across the bed and tuck both ends under the mattress. Also stops them falling out of the bed in the early days.

On topic, I would agree with others that its best to go for a light tog. In the summer, we just take the duvet out and they sleep with just the duvet cover. In the winter, a blanket on top works.

Have fun shopping.

We recently bought our 3 yo his first duvet, and were interested to read c/o John Lewis that 'When choosing a full-sized duvet for a child, unless their bedroom is very cold, it's best to stick with a lighter weight duvet between 4.5 and 9 tog. As children are smaller it means that their duvet traps more air and increases the level of warmth over and above that experienced by most adults. A heavier 13.5 tog duvet may well prove uncomfortable, and is not recommended'


No idea what research that's based on but in general my son still seems to like and be happily warm in lighter bedding than his parents.

I bought my son an all-seasons wool duvet and it's really fantastic. He tends to be on the hot side at night and never overheats in it because it's very breathable and light. They work by weight rather than tog. Most of the time he uses the summer weight one. We bought one for ourselves too and I love it. I don't feel like i'm vacumn-packed to the bed.
I got an all seasons which is a 4.5 tog and a 9 tog which you can use separately or button together. Little ones definitely don't need the same tog rating as adults. As it was for a single bed, and we wanted it to last for years to come (assuming it's the same bed now that she'll sleep in for years), we got ours from John Lewis, but I'm sure there will be cheaper alternatives out there too. Currently, she's in the 9 tog but her room is like the Arctic overnight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I agree its good to have a conversation about what Lordship lane really needs and I feel we are doing that in this forum; and some trying to steer it away from what commerce needs (lordship lane) and toward what people need, particularly our future generations who are being left a fractured future and are responding with higher suicide rates and depression.  no doubt the world of profit will win, but that is why some of us wish to speak out even if in vain.   I agree with you that there may be some underage drink drugs but would we all prefer that to be done behind closed doors .... I think more dangerous actually.   I applaud your optimism that dulwich estates could consider a skatepark into Dulwich park, maybe, although it could have closing time, insurance, safety issues. It would be great if a developer wants to include a skatepark, but I wonder what he would gain from that in terms of his profit.  I would rather give the benefit of doubt to those who leave behind the empty digital world and bravely try something communal, generative, challenging.   In the 1970s a tv programme urged teenagers to  "turn off your TV set and do something less boring instead" only some families can afford clubs......        
    • Just gone passed Love Dulwich cafe on the bus and there’s a sign outside stating “new Turkish restaurant opening soon” - I know the owners are Turkish but are they converting it already? 
    • I was surprised to learn that East Dulwich Picturehouse now only screens PG-rated films for their baby-friendly showings, unlike other Picturehouse branches. Apparently, this change happened after a complaint to the council about showing films above a PG rating to infants. Afaik, this policy only applies to this  branch. As a local parent, I find this frustrating. It limits our options, especially when many of us would love the chance to watch a wider range of films while caring for our little ones. For example, during Oscar Week, only one vintage film is being shown. Are we really expected to only consume toddler-focused content, like Cocomelon? I also worry about the precedent this sets. If other institutions, like the Tate or the National Portrait Gallery, applied similar restrictions, parents could be left with only child-oriented content. Babies under one don’t fully comprehend adult themes, so shouldn’t there be more flexibility? I’d love to hear what others think—should this policy be reconsidered?
    • I am a secondary teacher in the local area and totally agree that it’s so important for teenagers to be given a space to connect and learn skills. I think it’s lovely that they’ve been able to do this organically due to the carpark being derelict but it defeats the very concept of dynamic urban living to use this as a reason to block the development of the space into something that could benefit the whole community. I would really welcome an entrepreneur bringing a proposal forward that thinks about how we could best make the space work for everyone. I’d also love to see the council engage with the kids themselves on how and where to make the skate park permanent, perhaps in Dulwich Park itself. Give them some funding to make it nicer than a space by such a busy traffic route. I also agree we shouldn’t romanticise the skate park - they’re not principals in the Royal Ballet Company. I don’t think it’s hugely affecting the community, but let’s not pretend there isn’t some underage drinking and drug use going on there. But mainly the building itself is a waste of space and it’s often depressing to see the private security company vans parked out there late at night. Let’s use it as an opportunity to engage in conversations about what this part of Lordship Lane really needs. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...