Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear James,

I know there have been some threads here already regarding the cycle lane disquised as a pavement. Not only do pedestrians not realise its a cycle lane. The lane is also very slippery and in incorrect colour. Is there any government guidance/rules on what colours/materials cycle lanes should be made off/painted with?


I would be very interested to know.

Even though there may not have been many complaints prior to this being build, I believe if people knew what was coming there would be more then enough answers.


This design is totally crazy.


How many complaints does the council need to do something about this?

I would really appreciate your response.

Thank you

jitka

I raised this with the local councillors (not James) and the transport department. This is what they said:




Thankfully after I complained they removed the utility box and bollard that were blocking the lane at the top of Rye Lane by the lights, but the lamppost is still there so no surprises that nobody uses it!


While I'm at it, can I encourage every cyclist who uses the Surrey Canal Walk route to go slowly and be considerate of pedestrians on that path! We went out to talk to cyclists about this, people walking down the path say speeding cyclists are a huge problem - http://southwark.greenparty.org.uk/localsites/southwark/news/cyclists-told-to-take-it-slow.html

Here is the guidance


http://www.tfl.gov.uk/businessandpartners/publications/2766.aspx


I would say that the signage is the main problem, pedestrians simply don't know that there is a cycle lane there and I'm sick of getting abuse from pedestrians who think I'm cycling on the pavement.


On a slightly different note, is that Superdrug lorry allowed to park across the cycle lane forcing cyclists either onto the pavement or into the bus lane? It's there at least once a week.

robotcat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a slightly different note, is that Superdrug

> lorry allowed to park across the cycle lane

> forcing cyclists either onto the pavement or into

> the bus lane? It's there at least once a week.


Technically, yes, because there's no solid white line giving the lane any legal significance.

Hi Tom, I'd just like to reinforce the comments about pedestrians not realising it's a cycle lane. I understand the design is to slow everyone down but it doesn't work. Cycling at walking pace on the lane, I had two collisions in five days after a pedestrian (with back to me) stepped right in front of me with no time for me to react. They don't look behind them because it's a pavement (who would). In 20 years of cycling I've never had a collision with a pedestrian.


Also the northbound road leaves no room for cyclists to overtake stationary buses..so they jump up onto the cycle pavement.


Having cyclists on the pavement just does not work - the pavement is too busy.


I will be bringing this up at the Community Council meeting tm. Getting a bit fed up of money being wasted on road schemes that don't work in practise - esp when Rye Lane itself has been in desperate need of resurfacing for years (it's shocking at the moment although I understand the plan is to resurface as part of those works). The lane needs to be painted a different colour, that's blatently clear.


As for the canal path - what speeding? Most cyclists ride according to the conditions. Again I have never collided with a pedestrain on it in all the years I've used it and never seen a collision. If the pathway is clear you cycle quicker...if there are pedestrians you go slower until you safely pass them. Most times of the day it's fairly clear, only at rush hour will there be an abundance of cyclists going to/ from work. But there are those that just don't want cycling on any kind of pathway of course.

My thoughts, fwtw..


I go down to Peckham once a week or so, mostly weekends, usually getting off the bus by the shopping centre down the bottom. Even though I'm aware the cycle path is there, iI just don't notice it when I'm crossing the road if I'm between two buses, and I'm always shocked to realise I crossed without looking to see whether anything was coming. It simply doesn't stand out - the different colour cobbles just look like part of the pavement. I don't want to find fault but I'm sure I'm not the only person who's done the same. Added to which, as the cycle track is located above the kerb stone, how is someone who can't see supposed to realise the danger?

As someone who walks and cycles down the Surrey Canal, I have to say there are some considerate pedestrians/cyclists and some inconsiderate pedestrian/cyclists. We all need to share but it would be nice to walk along there and not feel like it is a section of the tour de france, which is how it can feel as a pedestrian when they all coming speeding past you.

it is a section of the tour de france, which is how it can feel as a pedestrian when they all coming speeding past you.


Define speeding...10 mphr? 20 mphr? The point is they ride past pedestrians not over them.....it's a perfectly safe route for both cyclists and pedestrians as it is.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As for the canal path - what speeding? Most

> cyclists ride according to the conditions. Again I

> have never collided with a pedestrain on it in all

> the years I've used it and never seen a collision.

> If the pathway is clear you cycle quicker...if

> there are pedestrians you go slower until you

> safely pass them. Most times of the day it's

> fairly clear, only at rush hour will there be an

> abundance of cyclists going to/ from work. But

> there are those that just don't want cycling on

> any kind of pathway of course.


Stand there for an hour one morning and you'll see all manner of behaviour! I'm saying this as someone who commutes along that path on my bike every day...


We witnessed some cyclists cutting pedestrians up, probably the majority going too fast and many being very sensible.


Part of the problem is that the faster route along Sumner Road isn't well signposted and is less convenient than zipping along Surrey Canal Walk.

Err Sumner Road is a road, with traffic. The canal path is a quiet cycle off road route and therefore safer.


I completely disagree with you that anti-social cyclists are anything like a major problem on the canal path....no more than cylist's, pedestrians and drivers you'll find anywhere else. I've been using that path every day for twenty years so know it very well.

tomchance Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> We witnessed some cyclists cutting pedestrians up,

> probably the majority going too fast and many

> being very sensible.

>

> Part of the problem is that the faster route along

> Sumner Road isn't well signposted and is less

> convenient than zipping along Surrey Canal Walk.


Hmmm, Sumner road is rubbish. I too use that route occasionally.

Aside form the traffic issue. The road surface is shocking and

there's glass all over the road at the Peckham end...useless!

DJKQ, I'm describing how it feels when you are walking when some of the faster cyclists come pass you. Yes they do ride pass you but some of us do feel they are cycling too fast. I do also cycle along there and plenty cyclists overtake me. It is the inconsiderate ones who just need to slow down a little bit. Like I said we all need to share.

'Feeling' a cyclist rides too fast means what? They are going top crash into someone or something? A feeling is relative. It doesn't mean they are cycling too fast.


And Pearson is correct in that the road surface of Sumner Road is shocking......but then the terrible maintenance of Roads in this borough is something that is nothing new.

Agreed, for some it's not a pleasant experience.


I might argue that I dislike cycling along there because the pedestrians

just wonder all over the place and present a hazard to cyclist.


Come on, it's about being considerate to each other. There will always be

someone (on both sides of the fence) who will step outside of the boundaries

and make it less pleasant for others.


As has already be mentioned, there are also cyclists you don't use that path

for the same reason you friend doesn't use the path.

I agree. It annoys me when you are cycling towards pedestrians and they can't seem to manage to move to one side. It is all about sharing as I really like walking and cycling along there.

Anyway back to the topic, the cycle path design has not been thought through properly. If they can manage to splash out on coloured paint for the other cycle paths and routes, surely it is not too much to ask for the council to find a spare tin or two for Rye Lane? Or perhaps we could all dig out what we have left over at home and then it really would stand out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...