Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thinking of getting rid of the old CRT TV. Wondering whether to get projector rather than a flat screen TV. I don't watch much actual TV. (I use a Tivo for the odd time-shifted programme, also iPlayer/4OD.) It's mainly movies and similar.


Any projector experiences? I'd be projecting onto a wall.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13591-tv-or-projector/
Share on other sites

Hi Louisiana


I have a company that installs home cinemas and Huguenot is correct about the black levels, though in my mind nothing beats a big projected image for watching films.


The main thing about ambient light is the light reflecting onto the wall you are projecting onto this will also be affected by the brightness of the projector and the colour of the walls in the room. A pure white room will reflect a lot of light back onto your projecting surface. It also helps if the wall you are projecting onto is darker than white (light to mid grey is best) I personally think turning the lights low all adds to the immersive experience.


Another thing to think about is noise from the projector as they have fans to cool the lamp some people find it distracting though the newer projectors are a lot quieter.


Also I suggest you avoid LCD projectors these are ideally suited for office use and tend to look less natural for video.


I have an old projector at home that we use for watching films, it's not HD but works pretty well for family use, you are welcolme to try it at home for an evening if you want?

pablogrande Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dont want to piss in your bonfire scarlet. Full HD

> means nothing other than the resolution its

> capable of no guarantee of quality. Why settle for

> 47inch when you can have 100+ and I am yet to see

> an LCD that matches the best plasmas.


No problem..but I dont rate plasma screens.I know lots of friends which have had problems with them![they did buy when they first came out mind] Lcd screens have moved on big time.Samsung make some of the best.

pablogrande Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dont want to piss in your bonfire scarlet. Full HD

> means nothing other than the resolution its

> capable of no guarantee of quality. Why settle for

> 47inch when you can have 100+ and I am yet to see

> an LCD that matches the best plasmas.


LCD image quality is worse than CRT. IS this an example of progress? :-S

Louisiana


That depends on what source you are feeding it ? old school vcr and (say) freeview digital stations will look worse


Partly because of LCD but also because the new screen is now bigger and the flaws with the source are more apparent


If you feed it a bluray, or HD, or console picture and you have settings set correctly you will quickly see it is indeed progress


But if you just want to watch what you do now on a flatscreen you might be dissapointed

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LCD image quality is worse than CRT. IS this an example of progress? :-S


Maybe true with standard definition broadcasts, as the CRT will naturally smooth the picture. Shouldn't be the case for HD (or even DVD) quality though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • wanted lego my child is collecting lego if you have any for sale please let me know
    • I'd actually go the whole hog and do a fondue, we all remember them fondly from parties in the last century or trips to Switzerland.  As long as it is cheese, not chocolate, urghhh
    • Gosh, that all sounds so familiar!  Southwark are constantly holding up their Outdoor Events Policy as proof of process, but then constantly allow exceptions when things aren't quite done correctly. Point in case, Gala's licence application - extract from the Consultation Findings Report - "The GALA team formally submitted their application to hold GALA 2025 to the council on the 7 October 2024. It is usually a requirement that applications for larger scale events are submitted with a minimum of 9 months to process them, but discretion can be applied if there are mitigating circumstances. 8.4 of the Outdoor Events Policy clarifies that processing applications received outside the stated lead-in times is at the Council's discretion. In this case: • The council were aware that Assembled Gala were preparing an application for the event to take place in 2025 in advance of their submission date, with operational discussions already taking place • GALA festival has been taking place in Peckham Rye Park since 2018 – less time is needed regarding event planning than if it were a new event • The GALA team already have a Premises Licence in place for this event (this is a pre- requisite for the Event Licence to be issued), so no time needed to be factored in for a premises licence application and decision-making process" So despite the fact that there would need to be major planning decisions due to the change of site access, they didn't think Gala needed to adhere to the same rules as everyone else? Makes me wonder what other rules they are exempted from... On a similar note, has anyone received a Resident Communication letter, containing the contact details for issues? We haven't, and we live directly opposite the site on Colyton Rd. They were supposedly distributed on 29/4...
    • We find that just adding your own favourites is the best way - everyone likes different things and your guests will likely be happy enough
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...