Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A flat in Glasgow is still occupied although all the other residents have moved out , this is because one family refuse to leave until the Council offer them more for their property, as its needed for the Commonwealth Village to be built on the site.. ?30000 in this day and age seems like an insult to this family to get rid of them to build. what do you think.. Im hoping the family are offered double this amount to allow them to move on and start again.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13589-house-only-being-worth-30000/
Share on other sites

Well I think you'd need all the details.


Is it their flat? What's the money for? How as it calculated? What are the alternatives?


They probably didn't build the flat themselves, so they're capitalising on the hard work and effort of other people. It may be that they should try and fit in with other people a bit more.


Don't forget, 'Councils' are spending your money, and trying to do it wisely.

The deep-fried Mars bar is mentioned in UK quarterly The Idler's book Crap Towns II: The Nation Decides in the article on Glasgow. 'SJ' writes: "They aren't an urban myth: they are available in both Glasgow and Edinburgh. I ate one on a cold December night. It was quite nice. Then I was sick."


All that for 60p


( & making that 30k flat look quite expensive )



W**F

It's a two bed flat in a tenement block, the story can be found here in the Daily Express, a newspaper for the recently decesased.


They have been the only residents in the tenement block for eight years, as even the council didn't deem it fit for human occupation.


If anyone knows them please feel free to pass on this link to 30,000 quid flats in Glasgow.


The council have also offered them council accommodation.


It seems to me that the place is likely to be squalid, but they're very attached to it. The 95 grand valuation is clearly a con, and she probably wouldn't want to leave whatever the price. There is a lands tribunal process in Scotland, and I don't think anyone's out to get them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think a lot of people here are just speculating about empty student accommodation properties. Student accommodation developments are very popular because they provide really great rates of return for the owner. A large student accommodation owner, Unite Students, saw 97.5% occupancy across their assets in the 2024/2025 academic year. They have many properties in London; https://pbsanews.co.uk/2024/10/09/unite-students-reports-record-occupancy-rates-in-q3-2024-update/ Here's a bit from CBRE on PBSA properties in London from May 2024: https://www.cbre.co.uk/press-releases/london-plan-policy-fails-to-deliver-affordable-student-accommodation - "According to new research by CBRE and QX Global, the gap between demand for PBSA and available supply in London currently stands at 100,000 – 105,000 full-time students, underscoring how demand for student housing has outpaced supply." - The development pipeline in London isn't keeping up with the demand. Ultimately this development wouldn't be built if student accommodation wasn't in demand. It's proximity to the station means that a student could get to any number of universities easily in a short span of time. Is it ideal? No. Would more affordable housing be better? Yes. Is speculating about channel migrants occupying the space uninformed idiocy? Absolutely.
    • Really pleased your cats are both home now, but what a very difficult situation.
    • it isn't said on any news source that I look at. Are you asking on social media whether what you read on other social media is true?
    • Thank you. Yes we scanned him last time, he is neutered & chipped. We asked neighbours who were feeding him to keep him in as, owner said she wasn't back till following day. That night whilst he was kept in, Gladys came back. The owner lives on a street who's garden  backs onto my friends garden. We asked neighbour that kept him in for night, to not feed him anymore. The owner said not long after she got him, he went out January, never went back till December! I did say so you don't want the cat, she said yes she does but she can't lock him in. I suggested she leaflet all houses who's back gardens back onto hers, to say to stop feeding him. She didn't do it. So until people stop feeding him, he will be a problem as he obviously doesn't want to go home and all the time she never saw him, there was no posters up looking for him, so it's one of those situations! He is a beautiful fluffy black and white and is enormous. Don't know what the solution would be if owner not bothered. Celia hammond overflowing, even kitten season was early this year. Can't take a owned cat though I'm sure he isn't happy. I'm hoping Gladys and Doris will go back home if he isn't loitering. Yes their owner does spray him with water but has little impact. It is a real problem and a worry that they are too frightened to go home and may travel further away. That is the real worry. Will keep post updated. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...