Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A flat in Glasgow is still occupied although all the other residents have moved out , this is because one family refuse to leave until the Council offer them more for their property, as its needed for the Commonwealth Village to be built on the site.. ?30000 in this day and age seems like an insult to this family to get rid of them to build. what do you think.. Im hoping the family are offered double this amount to allow them to move on and start again.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13589-house-only-being-worth-30000/
Share on other sites

Well I think you'd need all the details.


Is it their flat? What's the money for? How as it calculated? What are the alternatives?


They probably didn't build the flat themselves, so they're capitalising on the hard work and effort of other people. It may be that they should try and fit in with other people a bit more.


Don't forget, 'Councils' are spending your money, and trying to do it wisely.

The deep-fried Mars bar is mentioned in UK quarterly The Idler's book Crap Towns II: The Nation Decides in the article on Glasgow. 'SJ' writes: "They aren't an urban myth: they are available in both Glasgow and Edinburgh. I ate one on a cold December night. It was quite nice. Then I was sick."


All that for 60p


( & making that 30k flat look quite expensive )



W**F

It's a two bed flat in a tenement block, the story can be found here in the Daily Express, a newspaper for the recently decesased.


They have been the only residents in the tenement block for eight years, as even the council didn't deem it fit for human occupation.


If anyone knows them please feel free to pass on this link to 30,000 quid flats in Glasgow.


The council have also offered them council accommodation.


It seems to me that the place is likely to be squalid, but they're very attached to it. The 95 grand valuation is clearly a con, and she probably wouldn't want to leave whatever the price. There is a lands tribunal process in Scotland, and I don't think anyone's out to get them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.    
    • If the Qatari's decide to retaliate then it's all going off...but I suspect the Iranians are hoping for this - one inaccurate missile and the Qatari's may have to. I think the Iranian leadership is working on fast-tracking their own demise and the Americans and Israeli's planning for regime change, maybe with the many political prisoners the Israelis tried to free from the Elvin prison today. What a mess but clearly Iran was becoming a big threat to not only Israel but many of the other Gulf States and was clearly doing scary stuff with nuclear weapons that required action.
    • I can't find any references to an attack on a British base. where do you find one?
    • Flea darts...now there's a thing from my past I had long forgotten about - goodness our ! This thread title does always bring a smile to my face as I can't help but think it suggests a campaign to prevent the removal of someone's stash!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...