Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It depends on whether he's downloading anything which 'operation ore' might be interested in. In which case they'll be knocking at your door. Let's hope not.

Other than that.. he's just restricting your bandwidth (when you're both online), thus slowing-down your access. If that's ok with you, then it doesn't really matter.

I did read some comical Daily Hell article talking about paedophiles who cruised the streets in their cars with their laptops, looking for free wi-fi to download stuff through so it couldn't be traced.. but quite frankly I had more realistic worries, such as remembering not to leave the iron on.

A friend of mine has a neighbour who is a complete arse and at one point tried to kick his dog.

One day my mate noticed said neighbour had unencrypted wi-fi on a netgear router, and hadn't changed the default

usr: admin

pwd: password

router log in.


He logged on, changed the router log in and encrypted the man's own signal effectively rendering his broadband totally useless.

He changed it back after feeling guilty for a week, but that's what you're setting yourself up for if you don't protect your signal.

*Bob* I explained it in an earlier thread somewhere.

But basically on your router configuration thingy you'll find a security tab, or wifi options or something.


There you can select which type, WEP is pretty standard and should suffice against anyone but a determined hacker.

Generate a 64 or 128 bit code, apply it to your router, then put that code into any objects in your house that receive the wireless signal.

Probably your PC (via the receiver's own configuration screen), maybe an XBox or Wii or media centre etc.


Simple really.

Hi Bob


The password is for the router only and you need to also set up an encrypted password that is used to access the wireless link as well.


Don't forget to make sure that your SSID name isn't broadcast as well... makes it harder for the casual user to access if they can't see your signal

You're all nerds! ;-)


Regards

EDKiwi


PS - Bob don't forget to enable MAC address security as well, and you really should use WPA2 instead of WEP or WPA as well as both are crackable within minutes by anyone with access to Google (however, at least that excludes your neighbour now that he has no internet access!). Your PC wireless card needs to support WPA2 though and so does your router.

Quaywe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're all nerds! ;-)

>

> Regards

> EDKiwi

>

> PS - Bob don't forget to enable MAC address

> security as well, and you really should use WPA2

> instead of WEP or WPA as well as both are

> crackable within minutes by anyone with access to

> Google (however, at least that excludes your

> neighbour now that he has no internet access!).

> Your PC wireless card needs to support WPA2 though

> and so does your router.



Can I just say - Pot and Kettle here sir !!!


Also if you use a games machine (Wii, xbox or what ever) on the internet then it may not support WPA2 so be aware of that one

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My neighbour has one of these cars and I have never seen her with passengers or carrying goods. Can understand if they need to carry a wheelchair or small mobility scooter. Must admit I do not drive down certain roads as I know that there is insufficient room for 2 cars to pass.  
    • Must have been around 15- 20 years ago our house was repainted. I remember the cost of scaffolding was more expensive than the decorators.
    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...