Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I drove to the great Southwark (well actually outsourced) recycling Cathedral off the Old Kent Road today for my fortnightly visit and feeling of being at one with nature. I do this because the property I inhabit with others would need several blue bins otherwise and they are such an eyesore.


But my faith was once again put to the test. What I thought was going to be a leaflet full of Christmas cheer turned out to be yet another exercise in Southwark cost cutting. In the future if you want to bring a van you have to book in advance. And only four trips per year.


Just as I was thinking of getting rid of my car and hiring the on-street zip vehicle for an hour - but it is a van...


Last year it was the introduction of compulsory ID before you could enter, now this.


Now I fully understand the gradgrindish rationale. Wicked people from outside the borough were freeloading on our Centre! The new rules suggest that even more wicked people from within the borough are using their home address to do some COMMERCIAL clearing without paying.


But I do find it all so very depressing. The Cathedral is nowhere near operating at full capacity, and it achieves a 100% recycling rate. I can only assume that recycling is not cost effective, so the council is paying a great subsidy to the firm responsible for it to happen at all. But if so, then why are we recycling? There could only be an argument that the negative externalities from not recycling would be greater than the subsidy. But this creates its own distortion: those benefiting from the reduction in pollution (global warming etc) are NOT the same people as those paying the subsidy. In fact, these restrictions make street dumping of rubbish more likely.


This seems to me an obvious case for nationalisation. These plants should be available free for all, the subsidy paid (and justified) by central government.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...