Jump to content

?48 TODAY ONLY - New HP Envy 4500 All in 1 Printer w/ HP 301 Black + Tricolor Ink Cartridges


romamerc

Recommended Posts

I can't attach photos on here, so I'm linking my gumtree ad: https://www.gumtree.com/p/for-sale/48-today-only-new-hp-envy-4500-all-in-1-printer-w-hp-301-black-tricolor-ink-cartridges/1205676438

Ok everyone! I've got a really good deal for you. I originally bough it for over 70 pounds total, and it is still unopened, but Im leaving, so if you can come by and pick up the printer today, Ill give it to you for just 48 pounds!


I'm selling an HP Envy 4500 All in 1 Wifi Printer. It prints, scans, copies, and faxes, and is used through wifi, so no cables needed between the computer and the printer; you can print from anywhere in the flat! The printer is new and unopened, still in its original packaging, in fact, I bought this from Rymans, and the plastic they use to cover the box when they ship it was still on it till a minute ago, when I needed to open it because I'd forgotten the type of printer it was, so it really is as new as the come! I bought this a while ago, and never ended up using it, so now I'm selling it so you can use it.

When I bought the printer, I got the ink to go with it which I will be selling with the printer as well. It is 301 Black and Tricolor ink (1 of each cartridge), and is also new. I no longer have the cardboard box the ink came in, but the cartridges are individually wrapped in the box, and those are unopened. This also came with a set of photo paper and envelops that I'm gonna throw into this package, so you can print out those photos of family or friends that you've been dying to have, instead of just having them saved on the computer. :)

I've linked a photo of the printer in the unopened box, a picture of it before I'd opened the Ryman's wrapping so that you know it was from Ryman's and therefor the real hp printer, and the last pic is of the ink cartridge packs.


I'm based in Peckham, so let me know if you come by today, and it's yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to this?  I'll post Kuennsberg (spelling) link from this morning later.
    • So for those families that can't afford to send children with special needs to private schools it's OK for them to get 'inferior' education? The Guardian article appears quite vague on reductions in numbers at private schools as this is happening in state schools too as the birth rate declines. Do those children going into reception at 4 count as compulsory school age?  If so surely those that go private will be subject to VAT  On the comment on state school class sizes it's shocking that numbers are larger than when I was at school.  I'd like to think that Labour had done a proper assessment.  The dieing days of the Tories was shocking, we want this policy, government analyists "poor return on assessment", government policy heads "this won't work" - ministers and SPADs - "just do it".  Hoping Labour will be different despite too many early blemishes and poor decisions eg gifts. Telegraph is hardly going to support Labour.  Headlines yesterday amused me.   One in four pensioners over 80 will not get winter fuel payment.  So, Daily Express they aren't short of money.  And according to the Mail we are giving the Falklands back.  Not that it would bother me, apart from (Port) Stanley is always a good answer on Pointless.  But Labour would be silly if this was a policy. Ok, got into politics, and as said time will tell. Ps poor poor handling by Labour on winter fuel allowance     
    • I did a very quick & dirty calculation on this, based on the available numbers for England. Even assuming an elasticity of zero, ie no pupils leaving the private sector due to the tax rise, the net increase in the budget for the state sector would be around 3.5%. That's before any costs associated with collection and administration, which doesn't seem to have been particularly well thought through, according to the above Guardian article. It does all seem a bit 'dog whistle'. Even The Guardian calls the policy 'eye-catching' - there's very little substance to it. The net effect is negligible, given the trouble it'll cause.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...