Jump to content

Recommended Posts

nunhead_man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My missus says CCTV is overkill - starting to

> wonder



Unfortunately I don't think CCTV deters them anyway. They wear helmets and take off their license plates so can't be identified. They just don't care.

nunhead_man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My missus says CCTV is overkill - starting to

> wonder


To be honest all you're likely to catch is a film of guys with helmets on and false reg plates...if I was still biking (had to give up after my beloved Aprilia was nicked and the insurance became higher than the value of the bike!) I'd invest in one of those motion sensors that texts you if it's interfered with and maybe a GPS tracker.

I have requested that the council look at including a separate section with ground anchors for parking motorcycles at the end of some of the proposed yellow lines at each junction that they insist on installing. Where included that particular section of yellow lines could be a bit shorter while still maintaining the sight lines that appear to be the purpose of the lines.
Without wanting to debate the merits or otherwise of the lines, I can't really see the council going for that - a big adventure bike like an Africa Twin is 150cms high, which is more than enough to block sightlines for a car driver whose eyeline is around 100cms.

I think, rh, that the ACTUAL point of that BBC piece was that because of your 'precious' EU laws, the perps cannot be chucked out even if they are caught....but of course you have to take ANY allusion to foreigners committing crime as some sort of extreme right-wing rant -

However, the Telegraph may give a more 'intellectual' slant

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/12176689/Law-abiding-rapist-let-back-into-Britain-because-it-would-break-EU-law-to-deport-him-to-Romania.html

No, I don't take any allusion to foreigners committing crime as a rightwing rant; as pointed out, foreigners do commit crimes in almost exactly the same proportions as UK natives. However, when somebody wades into a discussion about bike crime in which not one person has mentioned the nationality of the perpetrators, saying "what are the government supposed to do" and linking to an article about foreign criminals being deported (incidentally if you read the article it's reporting on a highly dubious claim made by the Leave campaign during the referendum) that person is clearly implying that the criminals will be foreigners, even though there is no evidence to that effect and statistically they are far more likely to be UK citizens, then yes, that is a rightwing rant.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think, rh, that the ACTUAL point of that BBC

> piece was that because of your 'precious' EU laws,

> the perps cannot be chucked out even if they are

> caught....but of course you have to take ANY

> allusion to foreigners committing crime as some

> sort of extreme right-wing rant -

> However, the Telegraph may give a more

> 'intellectual' slant

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration

> /12176689/Law-abiding-rapist-let-back-into-Britain

> -because-it-would-break-EU-law-to-deport-him-to-Ro

> mania.html


Someone who confused the EU with the ECHR, which is nothing to do with the EU and which we're still committed to.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I probably had just read the thread where someone

> had been violently attacked in Goodrich road by

> perps on mopeds....


Where nobody mentioned the perpetrators' nationality.

I had an Aprilia RSV4. They more than likel tracked me home, or noticed it from a scotter drive by. It was stolen to ordr,no doubt. You can't have a nice bike in London unless it's locked inside a garage. That's the end of the story, really. My wife had her bike stolen, but got it back as it had a tracker. They found it, and another 20+ bikes stored with it.


Get a tracker if you've got a nice bike. Always ground anchor, always covered, always alarmed.


I also came out of my flat one morning at 3am, as something woke me up (i lived opposite the Actress) an 2 guys were wheeling another bike into a van. I shouted at them, and they dropped the bike and took off. I got descriptions, reg of the van, reg of the scooter. The police traced the van, but said there wasn't enough evidence to do anything. Pathetic.

Any East Dulwich ward residents who want a ground anchor in their front garden can have them installed free paid for by the council in our local attempt to prevent crime.


Email me for the application form with your address as well so I can confirm you're the area of benefit of the current ward boundaries.

Most friends and acquaintances who had their bikes stolen had invested little to nothing in security.

Guys, get a proper chain and try to secure it to some fixed object: a lamp post, if possible, the gate of your driveway, an anchor, etc.


Anything can be cut. If you google it, you'll find a video, dating a few months back, of two gentlemen on a scooter using a portable angle grinder to cut the chain of a Ducati in Soho, in broad daylight. Anything can be cut, but some chains are harder than others. Ignore what you can get from hardware stores and bike dealers, and go for Almaxx or Pragmasis chains; get at least a 16mm chain: it can be cut with a grinder, like anything, but not with bolt croppers.


Get a GPS tracker, but watch out for battery drain if your battery is small and you leave the bike unused for a while. Modern bikes with 12Ah batteries can stay parked unused for more than 2 weeks, without BikeTrac (the most used GPS tracker AFAIK) killing the bike's battery.


Alarms are useless - they simply drain the battery; so are alarmed chains and locks: muffling the sound is all too easy. The only thing which might make sense is the ulock with an alarmed remote, so that if someone tampers with it the remote wakes YOU up - counting on strangers or neighbours intervening won't help. Of course this only works if you keep your remote a few metres from the bike. I don't remember the name of the product, but google is your friend.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Any East Dulwich ward residents who want a ground

> anchor in their front garden can have them

> installed free paid for by the council in our

> local attempt to prevent crime.

>

> Email me for the application form with your

> address as well so I can confirm you're the area

> of benefit of the current ward boundaries.


To confirm the last bit it isn't "any East Dulwich" resident, just before people get their hopes up. It depends on ward.

  • 4 weeks later...

We had an anchor fitted by Southwark and we're not in East Dulwich ward.....definitely worth looking into.


I would also disagree with DulwichLondoner who says that alarms are useless. They can be the first line of defence and enough to deter would be thieves. I think there are generally 2 types of bike thief: kids who are going after automatic scooters and then the pros who target the superbikes. I would say in the case of the kids they aren't going to be carrying enough kit to muffle an alarm. Also if we're talking about the anchors then we're working on the assumption that a lot of people are keeping their bikes in their front gardens, therefore you would hear it.


I just fitted these https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00L5P4GAO/ref=pe_385721_37986871_TE_item to both my motorbike and Mrs Willard's scooter. Takes minutes to fit and for ?23 why wouldn't you?

@Willard, all it takes to muffle the alarm in a disc lock or padlock is to cover it with a towel - especially covering the tiny holes where the sound comes from; no specific kit required. Alarms installed on a bike are not as easy to muffle, of course. I don't like them because they drain the battery and can interfere with the electronics of the bike, but we all have our preferences.


Of course anything can be cut; at the end of the day, nothing can resist a portable angle grinder (noisy) or some hydraulic bolt cutters (way less noisy). Btw, neither tool is particularly expensive nor hard to source.


Last December, two distinguished gentlemen were filmed and chased away while trying to steal a Ducati in Soho square, in broad daylight, using a portable angle grinder. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/moment-heroic-bystanders-halt-thieves-bid-to-steal-40k-ducati-superbike-in-broad-daylight-in-soho-a3414021.html

Oh, and the policy not to pursue such gentlemen, especially if they remove their helmets, does not help much: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-32904622

@JamesBarber Hi James, I'm on Hindmans Rd so I believe that falls into Peckham Rye ward.


@Dulwich londoner - The alarms I have just fitted are not disc or padlock alarms, but yes I can see how they would be easy to muffle. They are hardwired into the battery and are fixed inside the bike. In order to stop them you would have to bust into the bike or under the saddle. Not really sure how you could muffle it therefore. Like I say, 20 odd quid, 5 minutes to fix, comes with 2 remote key fobs to activate and deactivate, amazing reviews on Amazon. Why wouldn't you do it? In a similar way to house burglaries, every deterrent you can add helps.


If anyone on here wants to fit one but doesn't feel confident doing it, PM me and I will do it for you for free. (instantly regrets saying that).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...