Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was enthralled by the wonderful Monkey Planet on BBC last night. But one bit sent me into panic. The Battle of the Apes series of films in the early 70s prophesied a future time when apes would take over from humans. (I am not sure if the remakes did similar).


I recall one scene when they were talking about how it all happened. There was a great plague that wiped out the cat and dog population so people adopted apes as pets. But they were much more useful and did work to support their human captors - and there was a clip of an ape cooking and preparing food. Imagine my shock when they showed yesterday a gorilla that could build a fire, light it with a match and toast marsh mellows.


Now all we need is the evolutionary leap with a human like voice box so apes can talk too and the future of the human race will be under threat.


I am sorry to spread panic and alarm but somebody needs to. What should I do to prepare for this?

In the 3rd planet of the apes film (where did you get battle of the apes ? ) the plot centre around three apes coming back in time from when apes rule the planet to 1973 and one of the apes is pregnant


At the end of the film milo (the infant ape who in later films is called Caesar) is swapped with a circus apes infant and is seen as asking for mama through the bars of the circus cage, hence the introduction of the first talking ape into the mix. A bit of a paradox as the first talking ape in the linage came from the last talking ape (at the end of the second film the apes discovered a nuclear device that blows up the planet just as the three apes escape back in time...)


The origional film follows on from the premise that mankind had been reduced to a small population after a nuclear war which allowed the talking apes to take over


Therefore you only need to worry that apes will take over if

A) time travel is proven to exist

B) the paradox of the first talking ape is resolved

C) cats and dogs are wiped out

D) apes are used as domestic help / pets

E) we have a nuclear war.


Okay E is likely with Trump on the nuclear button I guess however the message is "don't panic and Simian on"


Yours


Artful the science fiction nerd

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...