Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think much of the girly joky Katy Perry thing either. It just means 'I'm girly joky Katy Perry and I'm completely self centered and I think I'm better than you'.


People will probably think I'm being bossy. But really that means 'I'm completely self-centered and I'm going to try and deflect attention by criticizing you'.


Either like and respect people or don't. But if you don't be prepared to ask yourself a really difficult question, do people like or respect you?

Personally, I am disappointed that this thread was started (without proper planning and due consideration for the time of others reading it) and seemingly exists purely for third-party justification of tardiness and an elusive 'get out of jail' card.


'Honestly', lets all 'try harder' in future and throw our money in the 'Free Parking', eh?


PS. What time is it? (no, really)


PPS. Who the fuck is Katy Perry?

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm afraid I'm totally with cc and quids. There's

> only one thing to do to be late, and that's to

> think that your time is more important than

> theirs. The rest of it is technicalities.

>

> The 'I don't mean to be' is utterly pointless.

> It's effectively 'I don't mean to be completely

> self-centered and think I'm more important than

> you, but I do, and I'm going to rub your nose in

> it'.

>

> The 'I honestly' bit just makes it even worse. It

> means 'I honestly honestly think I'm more

> important than you'.

>

> 'I will try much harder' isn't floating my boat

> either. Because you're talking about disguising

> your contempt for other people.

>

> There's no answer to being on time, this threads

> exists because somebody wants third party

> justification for being smug and selfish. Somebody

> wants a 'get out of jail free' card to wave

> around.

>

> There isn't one, you're just selfish.



Blimey Huguenot...


I too am with CC and ????...was that not evident from my post?


And I was actually being sincere when I said that I would try harder...clearly that didn't come across either. And I do respect and value all of my friends, though I agree that being continually late would, prima facie, appear to be a contradiction. Nor do I think I am more important than them - not at all.


My post was meant to be a heartfelt one of shame and regret and of wishing to do better in the future...but I have clearly failed there.



*walks aways utterly dazed at Huguenot's response*

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And that just means 'I've been exposed for being

> completely self-centered and didn't get the

> answers I was hoping for, so now I'll try and make

> light of it'


Oh my gosh, have I really?


How do you know, Huguenot, that I didn't get the answers I was looking for? (katy perry aside)


> Just remember katie1997, it really is all about

> you. Really, you you you. ;-)


Really? So shall I make light of it or er ... perhaps adopt a serious tone with a smiley thing added for effect ?

It wasn't personal pookie, it was general.


But really, if you are habitually late for your friends then quite simply you do not respect and value them. You don't.


If you're late for everyone then you don't respect and value anyone.


I'm not talking about time in a clock way, I'm talking about it in a keeping people waiting way.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It wasn't personal pookie, it was general.

>

> But really, if you are habitually late for your

> friends then quite simply you do not respect and

> value them. You don't.


Yeah, I think I said earlier I agree with that. You don't. If you are habitually late for your friends.


> If you're late for everyone then you don't respect

> and value anyone.


And you'd eventually have no-one to wait for you if you didn't respect and value them. Y-es.


> I'm not talking about time in a clock way, I'm

> talking about it in a keeping people waiting way.


I see. W-ell I was talking about it in a general timing kinda way (and everything in between). You get me?


* thinks thats the last time I spend a whole 5 minutes (or so) taking photos of the Actress specially for far-flung forumites *

Oooooh katie1997, you're absolutely right, I should have realized that under your ditzy but yet patronizing disregard for other people's time there was a very serious girly concern for how you would be perceived.


Emoticons self-evidently banned, so you'll just need to guess if I'm smiling or not.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oooooh katie1997, you're absolutely right, I

> should have realized that under your ditzy but yet

> patronizing disregard for other people's time

> there was a very serious girly concern for how you

> would be perceived.

>

> Emoticons self-evidently banned, so you'll just

> need to guess if I'm smiling or not.


oh this is fun, is it compulsory or can I pretend to guess ?


is katy perry 'ditzy' btw ?

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It wasn't personal pookie, it was general.

>

> But really, if you are habitually late for your

> friends then quite simply you do not respect and

> value them. You don't.

>

> If you're late for everyone then you don't respect

> and value anyone.

>

> I'm not talking about time in a clock way, I'm

> talking about it in a keeping people waiting way.



I do understand your point(s) Huguenot and (to a degree) you are right. However, as alluded to above, my post was merely conveying a genuine realisation that my habitual tardiness was in fact a serious matter (as opposed to a laughing one). And the statement that I would try harder was heartfelt. Unless I am clearly messing about, I rarely say what I do not mean.


I regret having posted though. But perhaps I shouldn't because, whilst I had taken CC's and Quid's comments on board, yours have rammed them home to such an extent that I don't think I shall (without reasonable excuse) ever be late again.


I should just add that, when any of my friends are late, I don't get upset about it - I just get out the knitting. Usually no harm is done.

Well katie1997, you can choose your level of engagement, but I strongly recommend doing it in front of the mirror with the thumb of your left hand in your mouth and the index finger of your right hand curling your hair as you ponder how pretty you are.

Lessons must be taught and learned.


A certain forumite friend was late for a little BG meet-up last weekend, yes, 45 minutes late apparently but i wont name and shame that person, she knows who she is. Good job i was late too, to counter her tardiness.:))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...