Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I received a text appointment reminder for an NHS physio appointment. The text also laid out the costs of not attending to the NHS. I can of course understand this as a tool to prevent missed appointments by making people feel accountable. I would also expect from an ethical perspective that the amount quoted would be accurate.


The amount quoted was ?160, which surprised me greatly given I could easily find a private option for ?50-60. Are the costs really ~3x higher for the NHS? If so surely it is a no brainier for the NHS to outsource these treatments to a private sector provider and make an instant saving?


This probably misses some additional costs that would be incurred in administering and qualifying external providers, however given the bulk buying power the NHS would have discounted prices could surely be negotiated to at least offset this somewhat.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/
Share on other sites

Barts did a test on how to reduce missed appointments - and used ?160 as the figure


https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-missed-hospital-appointments-using-text-messages/a-zero-cost-way-to-reduce-missed-hospital-appointments


Maybe it isn't a real figure just nicked from the survey :)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077496
Share on other sites

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I got a reminder for something entirely different

> and that was ?160.00 too. Maybe they use that

> amount for everything.


I've had the same rate for two completely different things so I think it is just an average across all appointments - which I'm happy with. I wouldn't want someone spending the time to get an exact figure just to encourage me to turn up

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077498
Share on other sites

AM, PW,


If AM was quoted the same amount for a different treatment then it is probably an average for all missed appointments. In that case the text is at best poorly written and at worst deliberately misleading. I suppose you could argue that the end justifies the means even if it's the latter.


Miga,


The appointment was with a physio at an NHS hospital so not already outsourced. A comparable appointment at a private practice would be ?50-60 in central London at most places.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077501
Share on other sites

Hiya Loz, I always get a text the day before my appointments, from the hospital, the dentist and the quack (yep, I'm that high medical maintenance).


I'm ashumin' you got you one them portable style telephones, so jus' let 'em know yer digits an' they'll telegraph ya!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077814
Share on other sites

I think this figure is quite revealing. A home visit by a physio only costs ?50 (I book them for my father). So, if we take the figure on trust it suggests imputed costs are completely out of control. This corroborates the fact that real spending on the NHS (i.e. after inflation) has gone up every year for over a decade and yet services are 'at breaking point'. They know this which is why hospitals now tag disposable items with their cost to dissuade unnecessary use - but that is certainly not the problem.


Talking to a heart surgeon a while ago, he said he was doing half the operations he got through fifteen years ago. He is now completely encumbered by bureaucracy/paperwork. Administrators, managerialism have taken over.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077947
Share on other sites

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hiya Loz, I always get a text the day before my

> appointments, from the hospital, the dentist and

> the quack (yep, I'm that high medical

> maintenance).

>

> I'm ashumin' you got you one them portable style

> telephones, so jus' let 'em know yer digits an'

> they'll telegraph ya!


The doc and the dentist are fine with new tech - it's the hospital specialists that seem to be refusing to be dragged into the 21st century.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1078281
Share on other sites

A driver from the company with the franchise for hospital transport told me (in 2012) they were charging the NHS ?300 for the 10 minute trip from KCH to Dulwich. This carried just my mother in a 10 seater transporter from and to Dulwich- ie ?600 for the round trip. The driver was told not to take one of her neighbours from the same road, as they would be charging that journey on a separate bill, thus leaving exhausted sick people hanging around the transport waiting room. We never used the transport service again. Also it would only have cost ?30 for a cab. This company has the franchise for several hospitals.


At another hospital they are installing 20 Dyson 50 watt led uplighters at ?1000 each to light up a ceiling that they have just painted black.


A tiny glimpse at NHS costs before healthcare begins.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1079185
Share on other sites

I think these useless people get jobs through mates. I am convinced of this after Tessa Jowell used her friend Anthony Gormless's horrible lumps of metal around this area. And sticking statues of men on the beach, and the Angel of the North....yuk....what is wrong with Nature in the natural state...

The stone outside UCLH

https://www.ft.com/content/8e10bb3c-a7d1-11e4-be63-00144feab7de

I had occasion to visit someone there on and off for 2 years for 3 or 4 weeks at a time after that was placed and I can say that ALL the patients I saw were outside the back entrance having a fag....wheeled drip stands alongside them (metal sculptures in themselves- and they are difficult to get in some hospitals)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1079384
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...