Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I would like to see the nasty old bigot take to task when he arrives


Unfortunatley, the UK doesnt have a good track record at doing much with Vile old nazi tourists. Pinochet slipped back to Chile with a spring in his step after his extended British home stay.

Anyone who thinks there aren't people putting the boot into Islam in the "liberal" press isn't reading it properly


But if you are wondering why there isn't as much of it as you might like, from a comedy angle


Stewart Lee explaining possible reasons


I feel I can (and will) berate the Catholic church as much as like, because that's what I was brough up in - I know the codes, the vocabulary and the hypocricy intimately.


All that said I wouldn't stop the pope from coming here - let him come and generate debate

I have no issue with people's issues about the pope / catholic church. My only issue is with people calling him a Nazi, because he was in the Nazi youth. I'd have liked to have seen them refuse to go along with it at the time.


I know some people did, and I'd love to be able to say I'd have told them to do one, but realistically, when people are being dragged off here there and everywhere, can you blame people for sending their kids along, and keeping quiet?

word keef.

I'm no lover of catholicism or religion in general, but that is just a cheap shot.


There is something slightly worrying about anti-catholicism, which has an atavistcally deep-rooted nature in this country.


The levels of ire it generates seems to be out of all proportion of the levels of bad it manages. I'd put the church today roughly on a par with, say BP and even its nastiness in the past didnt come close to the evils done by secular power, but from what you read from forums, blogs, press and literature (you should see the lunatic fringe hatchet job 'history' book my dad gave me to read, i fear he may have lost it too) you'd think people really were talking about the Nazi party.

What Keef said, and Mockney. I don't know if there's anything to this, but I wonder how much the level of vitriol aimed at the Catholic church has to do with our history as a protestant country: one in the eye to the pope back then, and one in the eye to the pope now.


And Jah, as for your sister, I can see there's a great appeal to Catholicism, to the idea of confession and redemption - doesn't do it for me, but I can see there's potentially a lot of comfort to be found there.

I have little time for Catholicism and the idea of believing in things generally but it is worth pointing out that there is an increasing body of people within Catholicism who oppose the autocratic, conservative interpretation of the modern church.


Especially bullshit like papal infallibility (an idea cooked up at the first Vatican Council only about 100 years ago for political expediency)


In fact there has for the last half century been a vocal group of Catholics calling for the church to follow the principles from the second Vatican Council which were solidly squashed by the last pope.


While I fully support criticism for the institution and its leaders a lot of this is bordering on intolerance towards a group of the population based on their religion. And that?s a different kettle of fish entirely.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What Keef said, and Mockney. I don't know if

> there's anything to this, but I wonder how much

> the level of vitriol aimed at the Catholic church

> has to do with our history as a protestant

> country: one in the eye to the pope back then, and

> one in the eye to the pope now.

>



No - the vitriol here is very much directed at this Pope - not Catholicism per se. Although it has to be said that it is one of the more unpleasant religions when it comes to oppression, moral hypocrisy and all the other reasons why organised religion has no place in a modern society.


People object very strongly to this Pope as he is more reactionary than any in his place for quite some time, when he could actually be doing some good in his position (as bizarre a concept as that might be!)


I (along with many others) also strongly object to paying vast sums of money for his protection while he is here. I thought I was annoyed about cost of the Olympics but in terms of a value:money ratiothis one leaves that particular travesty in the shade!

Anyone worried about anti-Catholocism in this country should rest assured the picture is MUCH better than it was 20-30 years ago. Back then one of the main characters on Corrie being a Catholic was an an entire story-line. These days Catholics are everywhere and no-one bats an eyelid by comparison


I?m sure the anti is well ingrained culturally as well, and that many protestors are just using the occasion as an excuse to vent but I don?t think catholics are cowering in their beds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I agree with this, I'm afraid.  I see it every day within the industry - a lot of it is to do with the fact that the people working in it are younger now and don't realise how much they're being subconsciously indoctrinated by certain forces (social media and group-think), so they're now pathologically incapable of objectivity. Also, they don't read books, pick up the phone to experts, or generally know how to research properly.  On a lot of documentaries I've worked on, I've been leant on hard to peddle narratives that are not only heavily biased, but often outright inaccurate, and I've fought back where I can. It's really depressing,  I'd like to think that, at the BBC, I'd be immune from these influences, and allowed to project a 360 view, but it's sadly  not the case. You'd also be surprised at how toothless the BBC can be when presented with something that's irrefutable but could, say, upset Murdoch or the DM...  Hands up, I'm guilty of platforming extreme right-wingers, misogynists, anti-abortionists, racists, anarchists, pro gun lobbyists, rape-apologists... you name it, I'm all for putting them in a programme. Even though I deplore what they stand for, it's important to me to have a counter-view, and they almost always hang themselves.  (Job done.)  It's funny that certain people are up in arms about Rockets posting 'misinformation' in the Traffic threads, but  seem OK with it in broadcast, as long as it aligns with their views. You have to ask yourselves, what is it that you really want? If it's an echo chamber then just watch Fox News or CNN, however you lean. But then what's the point of it all? I fear the ship's sailed, so I don't know why I bother. 
    • That’s right, we could see them passing us at the stops and then as we overtook them. There was one moped without lights doing about 30mph.    Stupid is one word, but when it puts pedestrians at risk, it’s a different word. We’ll be raising it and hopefully get some publicity about road safety awareness 
    • Yes, your name and political views aren't mentioned there, you see. But what the title of the thread does refer to is a report in the Telegraph (and other right wing and, actually, left wing media) on an internal BBC memo that was considered by the BBC board on 17 October 2025 and which was so devastating the Director General himself considered he should resign.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...