Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The BBC is flagging its research into the impact of public sector spending cuts. The story is on their Website - Here.


Surprisingly, Southwark is reported as being fairly well placed with the overall ranking being 97 / 324 - certainly well above the median mark and on some measures way ahead of the pack on things such as vulnerable jobs (8/324), insolvencies (174/324), no of startups (14/324), house prices (19/324) and so on. Vulnerabilities include - "low social cohesion (322 / 324), high benefits claim rate (277/324)


Do you agree?


Edited to include more data

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13189-spending-cuts-resilience/
Share on other sites

I think it's intersting and does reflect some unique social change in the borough - for instance Lambeth and Lewisham (both next door) fair much worse. The Social change is that an area - the whole Southbank,Bermondsey Street and surround and borough - that were basically empty, abandoned wharfs 20-30 years ago is now chocker with very expensive flats/conversions and shops and restaurants and businesses. This regeneration has been unique to Southwark (in the south) as Lewisham has less nice riverside wharfs and Lambeth's Riverside is less extensive and mainly road. The south of Southwark has always been reasonably rich but the gentrificatin of SE22 for instance has also helped these figures, but they are after all just averages, the central bit of Southwark has some of the worse poverty in the country.

That was my first impression too Quids. Southwark comes out well only because the figures are an average. Perhaps like a microcosm of the country there is a massive gap between very wealthy and very poor with very little in between. So areas like the Village, some parts of Camberwell trendy bits of the Borough and Bermondsey and bits of ED bump the figures up.


The reality though is that the vast population vulnerable to spending cuts in Southwark are going to get trampled on and have opportunity taken away from them just as viciously as the conservatives are Jonesing for.

Yep you are right, yes we understand cuts have to be made but remember this is the Tories this is what they do all the time when in power what happen to the speech David Cameron made that the venerable and the poor will have help that is a fat lie they are thinking of cutting winter fuel and child benefits and other benefits that will hit the most poor any cuts this Tory government make always effect the most worst off. Lets be perfectly honest the handbag Lib/Dem because that is what they are the Tories handbag and public executioner will pretend to disagree but nod there heads like the Church hill dog.


At the moment the cuts have not hit people were it hurts as yet and as a country once again we are a bunch of noddy?s we nodd to everything to the heirs of Thatcher :X

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • SNTs don't, as you seem to imply,  consist of just PCSOs. I thought we all knew that.  This one comprises a sergeant, two PCs and a PCSO:  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/351681-dulwich-hill-newsletter-september-2024/#comment-1681337 or https://www.met.police.uk/area/your-area/met/southwark/dulwich-hill/on-the-team/crime-map. i've been to another SNT's meetings, and looked at the Met details of some others, and that complement looks fairly typical.  I've not been to one of these Cuppa things so can't speak of them.
    • PCSOs may not need specific qualifications, but they go through a reasonably rigorous recruitment process. Or at least they used to. It may have changed.
    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...