Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The BBC is flagging its research into the impact of public sector spending cuts. The story is on their Website - Here.


Surprisingly, Southwark is reported as being fairly well placed with the overall ranking being 97 / 324 - certainly well above the median mark and on some measures way ahead of the pack on things such as vulnerable jobs (8/324), insolvencies (174/324), no of startups (14/324), house prices (19/324) and so on. Vulnerabilities include - "low social cohesion (322 / 324), high benefits claim rate (277/324)


Do you agree?


Edited to include more data

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13189-spending-cuts-resilience/
Share on other sites

I think it's intersting and does reflect some unique social change in the borough - for instance Lambeth and Lewisham (both next door) fair much worse. The Social change is that an area - the whole Southbank,Bermondsey Street and surround and borough - that were basically empty, abandoned wharfs 20-30 years ago is now chocker with very expensive flats/conversions and shops and restaurants and businesses. This regeneration has been unique to Southwark (in the south) as Lewisham has less nice riverside wharfs and Lambeth's Riverside is less extensive and mainly road. The south of Southwark has always been reasonably rich but the gentrificatin of SE22 for instance has also helped these figures, but they are after all just averages, the central bit of Southwark has some of the worse poverty in the country.

That was my first impression too Quids. Southwark comes out well only because the figures are an average. Perhaps like a microcosm of the country there is a massive gap between very wealthy and very poor with very little in between. So areas like the Village, some parts of Camberwell trendy bits of the Borough and Bermondsey and bits of ED bump the figures up.


The reality though is that the vast population vulnerable to spending cuts in Southwark are going to get trampled on and have opportunity taken away from them just as viciously as the conservatives are Jonesing for.

Yep you are right, yes we understand cuts have to be made but remember this is the Tories this is what they do all the time when in power what happen to the speech David Cameron made that the venerable and the poor will have help that is a fat lie they are thinking of cutting winter fuel and child benefits and other benefits that will hit the most poor any cuts this Tory government make always effect the most worst off. Lets be perfectly honest the handbag Lib/Dem because that is what they are the Tories handbag and public executioner will pretend to disagree but nod there heads like the Church hill dog.


At the moment the cuts have not hit people were it hurts as yet and as a country once again we are a bunch of noddy?s we nodd to everything to the heirs of Thatcher :X

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • People don’t go out of their way to leave  their valuables out on the porch  they are most likely at work when a delivery company decides on their behalf to just leave it on the doorstep.  They are the problem not “people being surprised when their items disappear” 
    • Yes, Direct Line automatically rejected it when I tried to get a quote. Insurers really are a nightmare, and they have a huge psychological impact on buyers. When you’re about to put £1m into a pile of bricks, and the insurance companies either refuse to insure it or quote an outrageous premium, of course it’s going to scare anyone. I’m not actually worried about subsidence in this house main building , but the bay window has definitely been affected by that tree, and the council won’t remove it. When the movement continues, rebuilding the bay window would cost at least £40k. The seller will never admit this, but there are already houses on that street where the bay windows have had to be rebuilt. If not East Dulwich, I’m now looking towards the west. There are a lot of subsidence issues with properties in Forest Hill, and Bromley and West Wickham aren’t really for me. I’m not interested in any part of Dulwich except ED, ND and Dulwich Village — and obviously ED offers the best value.
    • Not sure what you are looking for, but my suggestion would be around Forest Hill, certain parts of Bromley and West Wickham  Telegraph Hill. All nice areas- safe and you get more for your money. Really depends on how you travel, or don’t.. as inn needing good transport links to City. Like I said, feel free to pm me.. abit difficult to advise if not sure what you are after, but pretty sure not a flat!  oh, West Dulwich and Herne Hill area.  
    • I honestly can’t believe how TW operates. Just like the councils and UK Power Networks — what kind of people are they? I’ve cried my way through some projects because I had to liaise with these departments. No wonder I feel like running away every time their names come up. I first started thinking about walking away when I noticed the main water issue with TW (which would delay the project), the potential drainage problem, and the higher insurance claims than what I was initially told, plus the ongoing issues. Subsidences can be very different,  my current house definitely had subsidence back in 50 years ago, but the previous owner never made any claims, and there has never been a drainage issue or damp issue. All of this has increased my concern about the project time and resale value. I don’t want this to turn into a liability instead of an asset.  I’m now also looking at properties in Clapham common, same price, a lot bigger
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...