Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm with you Sean. The war and some hideous sixties and seventies developments were the end of London's traditional skyline.

No point going backwards, so developments like the London Bridge regeneration can surely only be a good thing, they're currently some of the ugliest buildings in London.

re: cost


Well, a large proportion of those buildings appear to be proper, City, type jobs so let Messrs Lynch, Morgan and co worry about the cost of those


If you mean the cost of the Olympic and related municipal stuff then clearly we are collectively going to be paying for it. But then again, I LIKE collectively paying for stuff. Gives us a sense of community and shared ownership. Oftentime anyway


I like the Dome. As a building. Not for anything they have done with it. Ever. but as a building. I wouldn't go back to a time before it existed. And most of it was paid via lottery money anyway. Which is NOT the same as taxation.

I shalln't risk incurring the wrath of the hardline administrator by straying from the skyline topic - but it's a skilled man indeed who can open so many cans of worms in so few words Sean.


Skyline branding is very interesting in the global cities chart. I have long argued that Glasgow retained its reputation for razor-weilding high rise blocks during the culture city 90's despite it's astonishing victoriana because the victorian stuff doesn't provide a notable skyline. Edinburgh's corporate logo of the same period was just the word Edinburgh with the skyline of the castle and st giles' cathedral above. For the same reasons I thought the London Olympic bid logo was fantastic - a thames shaped olympic riband.


Ultraconsultancy

monkeydoctor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thought this might be of interest: the central

> london skyline from our neck of the woods after 5

> yrs of planned building projects:


Fantastic - great views now and into the future. I now live half way down Forest Hill and the clincher when looking at the house was the view from the top floor back bedroom, also known as Dad's study!


Tonight I can see the Millenium Wheel, Houes of Parliament, St Pauls and so on. These new buildings add to London's charm - constantly changing, constantly challenging, constantly London. Unless central London planning has changed completely (and it may have) on the ground old rights of way and alley ways will still be preserved - so you can have the most modern glass and steel building athwart a Dickensian alley way with a Georgian pub or coffee house still part of the adjacent structures. cf "The Old Samuel Butler's Head" in the city.

  • 5 years later...

Nice geo work.


Your window ledge needs a scrub after 5 years.


If you ever have the pleasure of visiting Japan - spend a day in Tokyo and go up to the top of the Goverment Building (forget what its called) and take a photo - then compare to London. We have it good, at the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There has been a number of achievements, but drowned out due to: Bloody awful comms from the government Some daft decisions and initiatives, then either digging themselves into a hole and/or turning For example the well off should not get winter fuel allowance, benefit needs to be reformed and rich farmers should not get tax breaks, but we now how all that went  Employers national insurance - money has to be raised from somewhere but that is the difficult question The image from the right wing press has now stuck, propagated by traditional and social media. And then some appalling acts of self harm. We of course all know better, but I do wonder about the competence of those advising him.
    • Left on wall outside 27 landells Rd ( end near Lordship Lane and library )
    • When did this whole “elect a govt and then change leaders as we see fit “ notion take hold ? it didn’t help the Tories and it won’t help Labour  (and why do people think they can change leaders, call new elections on a whim, but NEVER EVER talk about changing Brexit)  I dont think starmer is doing a good job. But he was elected. And the volatile electorate wanting short term fixes are part of the reason behind his ultra-cautiousness  Complaining about govt and suggesting change of direction seem fine to me. Demanding a change of leader not so much  that being said, if there was some Labour implosion and someone like Burgon was in some mad scenario made leader, then I think the electorate should be entitled to a general election. Just as it should have happened when Johnson was replaced 
    • Personally, I would like to see labour do something positive for the country, unfortunately under Starmer and Reeves the opposite is true. Change of leadership.is now required, not a general election at this stage but if Starmer and Reeves stay in post then the May local elections will give Reform more power.  Now is the time for change and damage limitation , not after May when large number of reform local councillors will be voted in as a protest against this Government. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...