Jump to content

Recommended Posts

She is a permanent fixture I believe- my daughter goes to the nursery there- which is brilliant.

I really hope people living locally look at GG this year as it is a rapidly changing school.I know people in the main school as well and they all speak highly of the school.

GG has had a poor name in the past I know but if you actually go and look around and see it now I think most people would be really surprised and impressed!

Hi there,


As I've mentioned before on the forum, my son goes to Goose Green and we have been very happy with the school and his progress. He was in reception last year and is now in Year One. I feel the school gets the right balance between meeting the children's wider emotional needs (as evidenced by the school being the only school in Southwark to be awarded an 'Every Child Matters award - the woman who devised the Every Child Matters Framework came to the school to assess it for the award and she was extremely positive about the whole school) and his academic needs. His reading and handwriting are coming along very nicely indeed - and he is reading at Level 3 (Oxford Reading Scheme) The Headmistress, Mrs. Marland is indeed there on a permanent basis - she can been seen in school playgrounds most mornings and after school talking to parents and students. The school has turned around a great deal - and I think another piece of evidence is the recent school Sats of the year 6 pupils where I've heard through the grapevine the school came in at 12th place in Southwark, the highest of all the local schools I've heard (but when the figures are published we can confirm this). I've also heard that the attendence rates for the school are now amongst the highest in Southwark.


Another great thing is the after-school activities - these are subsidised by the school so that pupils from year 1 upwards can take part in sport, art, drama and ICT - all for ?16.50 a term (except guitar classes and the soon to be offered keyboard lessons which are slightly higher - particularly guitar as the students take home an instrument). Unlike another nearby school which has sub-contracted the after-school activities out so they now cost parents in the region of ?80 a term! There is an Eco-Warriors club for budding environmentals and academic/gifted students do receive particular attention (i.e. brightest maths students have maths lessons with the Head and a parent with an older child told me a few of the scientifically gifted children went on a special trip to the science museum in a small group with a teacher)


Anyway, I better stop now - I have work to get on with but I highly encourage parents to look around, ask questions and see for yourself what you think about the school.

Thank you all so much. I really find all your comments extremely useful and I appreciate the time you have taken to respond to me. I will of course update you all after my visit :-) Already I am feeling positive towards the school (which is a start) and speaking to a few of you who are giving me first hand insight into the school has been productive and will help me make my decision.

I will be joining GG PTA if we decide on sending our kids there.........

I have a daughter at GG nursery; she is very happy indeed and I think that the staff and facilities are wonderful. I also have a son in Y1. We did not apply for the school 2 years ago as it was in SM but were given the allocation in the shakedown and I can honestly say that I wouldn't move him (indeed we had the option last year when offered our 4th choice and didn't take it) in my opinion the school has very high expectations of the children in terms of academic achievement and behaviour. The sats results and every child matters award evidence their success in achieving those expectations.


In my experience the children are taught to the level of the highest achievers and are also streamed to a greater or lesser extent.

I believe that parents need to get behind the school; it is the partnership of school and parents that make somewhere good or outstanding. I believe that Mrs Marland and her staff will achieve that but if parents wait until then they may find it rather more difficult to get in!


Hope you enjoy your visit, please feel free to PM me with any queries.

Hello and congratulations on being offered a place at Goose Green Primary - which is now an oversubscribed school. The school turned a significant corner just before the Summer and is now on a par with the local 'popular' schools - always with an aspiration to acheive greater things. The school reflects the local community and engages with it. The parents, staff and pupils are enormously proud of our school. But don't take my word for it (or anyone else's for that matter) - come and see the school in action and make your own mind up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I agree its good to have a conversation about what Lordship lane really needs and I feel we are doing that in this forum; and some trying to steer it away from what commerce needs (lordship lane) and toward what people need, particularly our future generations who are being left a fractured future and are responding with higher suicide rates and depression.  no doubt the world of profit will win, but that is why some of us wish to speak out even if in vain.   I agree with you that there may be some underage drink drugs but would we all prefer that to be done behind closed doors .... I think more dangerous actually.   I applaud your optimism that dulwich estates could consider a skatepark into Dulwich park, maybe, although it could have closing time, insurance, safety issues. It would be great if a developer wants to include a skatepark, but I wonder what he would gain from that in terms of his profit.  I would rather give the benefit of doubt to those who leave behind the empty digital world and bravely try something communal, generative, challenging.   In the 1970s a tv programme urged teenagers to  "turn off your TV set and do something less boring instead" only some families can afford clubs......        
    • Just gone passed Love Dulwich cafe on the bus and there’s a sign outside stating “new Turkish restaurant opening soon” - I know the owners are Turkish but are they converting it already? 
    • I was surprised to learn that East Dulwich Picturehouse now only screens PG-rated films for their baby-friendly showings, unlike other Picturehouse branches. Apparently, this change happened after a complaint to the council about showing films above a PG rating to infants. Afaik, this policy only applies to this  branch. As a local parent, I find this frustrating. It limits our options, especially when many of us would love the chance to watch a wider range of films while caring for our little ones. For example, during Oscar Week, only one vintage film is being shown. Are we really expected to only consume toddler-focused content, like Cocomelon? I also worry about the precedent this sets. If other institutions, like the Tate or the National Portrait Gallery, applied similar restrictions, parents could be left with only child-oriented content. Babies under one don’t fully comprehend adult themes, so shouldn’t there be more flexibility? I’d love to hear what others think—should this policy be reconsidered?
    • I am a secondary teacher in the local area and totally agree that it’s so important for teenagers to be given a space to connect and learn skills. I think it’s lovely that they’ve been able to do this organically due to the carpark being derelict but it defeats the very concept of dynamic urban living to use this as a reason to block the development of the space into something that could benefit the whole community. I would really welcome an entrepreneur bringing a proposal forward that thinks about how we could best make the space work for everyone. I’d also love to see the council engage with the kids themselves on how and where to make the skate park permanent, perhaps in Dulwich Park itself. Give them some funding to make it nicer than a space by such a busy traffic route. I also agree we shouldn’t romanticise the skate park - they’re not principals in the Royal Ballet Company. I don’t think it’s hugely affecting the community, but let’s not pretend there isn’t some underage drinking and drug use going on there. But mainly the building itself is a waste of space and it’s often depressing to see the private security company vans parked out there late at night. Let’s use it as an opportunity to engage in conversations about what this part of Lordship Lane really needs. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...