Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think that one day insects wuill inherit the earth. I have just been watching a David Attenborough documentary about African ants. These ants are farmers. They take grass back to their mounds and a special fungus is grown on it. It's the only place in the world that this fungus grows and these ants eat it. However, it produces dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have built their mounds to have air conditioning so that harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing. Individually the ants have no intelligence, but collectively they are like cells in a massive brain.

waynetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

However, it produces

> dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have built

> their mounds to have air conditioning so that

> harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing.

> Individually the ants have no intelligence, but

> collectively they are like cells in a massive

> brain.


Blimey - so ants are contributing to global warming?

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> waynetta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> However, it produces

> > dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have

> built

> > their mounds to have air conditioning so that

> > harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing.

> > Individually the ants have no intelligence, but

> > collectively they are like cells in a massive

> > brain.

>

> Blimey - so ants are contributing to global

> warming?


Noooooo LM they aren't.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't carb. mon a GH gas?


Y-es. It is also a naturally occuring substance and has been around for a very long time.


*thinks probably as long as LM's guests have been wondering where she is*

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I often find it helps to break down these

> questions into smaller fragments - in this case

> before deciding what makes us 'human', you have to

> decide what 'human' is.

>

> This isn't as simple as it sounds. It's difficult

> to define what 'human' is in any consistent way.

> For example we could argue that humans have two

> arms and two legs, but we're all agreed that

> losing a limb in an accident doesn't make us less

> than human.

>

> Likewise we're familiar with anatomically perfect

> people being described as 'inhuman', so apparently

> defining a 'human' must somehow revolve around a

> set of values - not a physical form.

>

> We're into the realm of many great philosophers

> here, particularly concerning whether these values

> can be defined or expressed in particular actions,

> or whether the thoughts themselves are what

> defines our humanity.

>

> In other words, if we think nice thoughts but are

> unable to put them into action then are we still

> nice? More pointedly if we think nasty thoughts

> but do good deeds are we then good?

>

> For most people, a person thinking nasty thoughts

> but doing good deeds would be described in

> unpleasant terms - for example 'two faced'.

>

> So possibly we could conclude the generally

> accepted definition of 'human' lies within

> thoughts and beliefs, not in actions or

> appearances.

>

> Those thoughts and beliefs considered most

> 'humane' are generally altruistic ones - a process

> which requires abstract reasoning, an

> understanding of cause and effect, and

> collaboration for the greater good.

>

> In other words what makes us human is the ability

> to do things such as watching the wildlife,

> drawing insights and parallels, and using these to

> inform our decisions about the future on both a

> moral plane and a physical one.


Blimey Mr. H - that post (almost) sobered me up...beautiful.

LM the earth's atmosphere is a greenhouse atmosphere and always has been. We breath in Oxygen and breathe out CO2, plants abosorb it and release oxygen and so on. The issue is the over prduction of CO2 above and beyond the normal balance of life on the planet and in that regard we are mostly responsible.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes but so is C02...it's still causing probs

> though as it re-radiates the sun's heat and

> contributes to global warming.

> *thinks...not bad for half a frog*


*thinks...then decides against it*


> *disappears back to guests/another top up of

> cider*


*wonders how many moles of CO2 are in LM's cider* :)-D

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM the earth's atmosphere is a greenhouse

> atmosphere and always has been. We breath in

> Oxygen and breathe out CO2, plants abosorb it and

> release oxygen and so on. The issue is the over

> prduction of CO2 above and beyond the normal

> balance of life on the planet and in that regard

> we are mostly responsible.


No it hasn't. Earth's atmosphere has changed throughout the history of the planet. For example, there was much less oxygen in the atmosphere 2400 million years ago. Oh and there are far less rare gases in the atmosphere now than existed a very long time ago too.


PS. *warns moles to leave LM's cider alone*

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's true but in the modern lifespan of the

> planet it is a greenhouse atmoshpere and it's that

> greenhouse atmosphere that has given us the

> ecosystems we have.


I'd like to know what you consider to be the 'modern lifespan of the planet'. The trouble is.....this often varies from person to person. Makes it very difficult to accurately demonstrate scientific facts. So your earlier comment about the Earth's atmosphere having always being a greenhouse environment is completely inaccurate, to put it politely.


When do you think the 'greenhouse atmosphere that gave us the ecosystems we have' came into existence?


The planet used to have a reducing environment and then it became an oxidising environment.

No those greenhouse gasses are what have allowed the earth to have the range of temperatures necessary for life. Without them too cold, too much of them too hot. It's called the 'Goldilocks Principle' and is why we are the only planet on our solar system with life. The main gases are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide and they trap sufficent solar energy to create the right temperature ranges.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went last week and would recommend. I was very happy to see pricing based on hair length and especially a fringe trim price. I live nearby and don’t need it fully styled / blown out after a cut (curly so usually prefer to do it myself) so I like that it is variable pricing in that way. 
    • Memes top of lordship haircut shampoo blow dry about £25  dulwich barbers hair cut about£22  jazzes haircut about £26 
    • Re Day One, £52 for a short hair cut (cut & styling) and £72 for a long hair cut (cut & styling) which I believe is below the ears.  £38 for a blow dry which doesn’t appear to be included in the cut price as it’s not mentioned.  £15 for a fringe tidy.      I remember being startled to be charged separately for a blow dry by the salon that used to be in Melbourne Grove but is now closed down.  I was asked if I wanted a blow dry after the cut and highlights and said yes, but wasn’t told that I would be charged separately.  Only found out when I went to pay the bill.    Was offered a voucher on a further appointment.    De.Salon which used to be Cut-Throat in Peckham (Choumert Rd and Brixton) charge from £45 for a Short haircut that finishes by the ears.  They charge from £40 for any haircut that finishes below the jawline.  Their prices include a blow dry.  But if you have thick hair they charge an extra £15 for every additional 15 minutes for cutting.     I had my hair cut there before the name change.  I don’t understand the from part of the price. Had a look at the Blue Tit pricing which is very complicated. They charge depending on the stylist’s  experience.  Crab Salad in Peckham  -  short hair cut above the ear - from £69.    Long hair Cut below the ear from £80. Blow dry not mentioned as being included in the cut but is priced at £55 I noticed that Kuki charge different prices for men and women.  Doesn’t seem right if a woman has short hair and a man has long hair.   I used to go to a great salon in NW London  that charged the same price for men and women and stopped going when they upped their prices for women.  
    • BIAB is supposed to be less damaging to the nails than Shellac. It stands for Builder in a Bottle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...