Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yup, I had the same experience with se23 dot com - one of the forum rules that the "Webmaster" has is that you are not allowed to discuss the forum. I persisted, did the bad thing twice and have now had my posting rights revoked.


Maybe the EDForum (which is much more of a benevolent dictatorship) could have an area for se23 dot com refugees?

So the user "lovely" also went onto wikipedia and deleted the link to the East Dulwich Forum from the East Dulwich page! And then put a link to the other forum (whose links I've had removed from this post) calling it "The community forum for East Dulwich".


If you're going to be competition for this forum Steve please play fairly.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, as we suspected it transpires that the user

> "lovely" is behind the other forum. Why did he

> have to be so underhand and sneaky about it by

> coming on here and lying? It's not really a good

> basis on which to run a community forum is it?


It was all worth it for the comedy denial though. Like a child covered in chocolate who claims not to have been anywhere near the biscuit barrel.


What a plum.

char1ie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm sure it's fine to publicise website owners:

> http://www.who.is/whois-uk/ip-address/eastdulwichforum.co.uk/

>

> Charlie


Hmmm ... the link says Mark has opted to hide his address because he's a non-trading individual. Surely not correct, in regard to the sponsored ads here?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...