Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if anyone else has been made aware, but in the last month or so, especially up around the junction with Peckham Rye/EDR (and the surrounding back roads) puddles of vommit have appeared at random locations. I wouldnt usually raise this, but all of the vommit looks suspiciously similar, which to me would suggest someone or something is producing the ghastly mess on their todd.


I was out with my friend last week and we noticed that one of these puddles had been strategically aimed into a gorgeous rose bush just off of the Barry Road/Upland Road junction. My hunch is that one person is leaving a pub late in the evening and for whatever reason is depositing their pukey load in apparantly inconspicuous locations. If anyone else notices a pile of puke in or around any of the places mentioned (or indeed somewhere else) please let me know because I want this person to be caught and sent to a GP at the very least (they must be terribly dehydrated), and we may be able to get a few PCSO's on the lookout for the phantom puker too.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12902-the-phantom-vommiter/
Share on other sites

all of the vommit looks suspiciously similar


I admit to not being the most ardent vomitologist ever, but doesn't all of it look pretty much the same?


Perhaps it's just me. Perhaps you can pick out a particular pile from an identity parade of spew by the quality of its chunks or something.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yeah, why does it always seem to have chopped

> carrot in it?


That's the work of the chopped carrot pixies, they seek out puddles of vomit and spinkle them with chopped carrots from their little magic chopped carrot bags.

I reckon the person spewing all that nonsense around ED was good old scouser girl DJKQ! Either that or her dodgy accent just automatically makes her spit it out as she speaks hehe... No that was unfair, I love you really DJKQ! You are a bit of a card actually! Although, I wouldnt fancy getting on the wrong side of you again, I like my tyres on my car lmao :))


I wish some people would get a sense of humour button. Oh and for the record, this isnt a trolling post, lots of people have noticed suspicious pools of you know what dotted around the PR area and they have increased in frequency in recent weeks too!!


Louisa.

No it's not all ED residents have to worry about.

There's plenty more, I tell you, like what kind of shop they should have in vacant spaces along Lordship Lane, what to do about trolls, why no-one knows about the wonders of the Peckham Farmers Market and so on.

These are sleep depriving nightmares of concern.

Peckhampam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >all of the vommit looks suspiciously similar

>

> Does no one remember the Billy Connolly rap about

> vomit. It always has chopped up carrot in it.

>

> + shame on EDF...it is voMit with 1 m


also I remember the one about two scotsmen go to Rome , and go into a bar and ask for a pint each of what ever the Pope drinks , which happens to be Creme De Menthe , they are each served pints of this stuff , then another , they wake up in a doorway the next morning covered in puke , one turns to the other and says " Ohk ! ma feckin heed , nay wonder they have to carry the bastadd around in a chair if thats what he drinks!"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...