Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Watched the first episode last night, and was up for another, but it was late, and Mrs Keef voted for the last Yes Prime Minister series 1 (which we will not be giving to Fear n' boozin as a late crimbo pressie).


I liked it. Right from the opening credits, you could see the HBO quality of Sopranos and Rome. To early to say I'm a convert, but it looks promising... Only hope that Mrs Keef comes with me on this, else it will be a nightmare trying to find the time to watch it on my own...

I love the number of converts we've managed.


I'm now awaiting the delivery of series three from Amazon rental. Series two was a terrific insight into the world fo the Baltimore dockers and their unusual breakfasts (pint of lager with a raw egg or two dropped in for good measure).


What does series three focus on? Politicians?

Just finished the third series last night in a three episode binge (I'd been pacing myself because I can't wait for the fourth series to come out on the 10th of March).


It really is the best television series I have ever seen. There is no other programme, to my knowledge, that is as realistic as this. I can't watch other shows now, they seem like mere pantomime.


Cannae wait for the fourth!

You can tell by the speed of eveents that the end of series 3 came about because, although there were a series 4 and 5 written, there was also a chance they wouldn't get recommisioned after 3


But yeah, then ending of 3, the impact, the fallout (McNulty;s line near the end) - have to be careful not to spoiler


And you're right barrymarshall - all other TV shows are like pantomome afterwards. If they are OBVIOUSLY pantomime like Heroes they can still be enjoyable.. but anything pretending to be "serious" just looks like farce. Patronising farce at that


*feels mild sense of satisfaction that the thread has made 4 pages so far and most people who watched have been converted. Mwah hah hah*

I can't wait! One of the show's strengths is that it shifts focus and pace with each series. I didn't think the stevedore storyline, first of all, would have the sufficient drama of the drug-gang, but three episodes in I was dead wrong. In fact, I liked the references to it at the end of series three - the Frank Sobotka posters and McNulty going back to ... Well, don't want to spoil it for anyone else!

I was reading a TV review saying that after many years of standard soap fare, The Bill was really stretching itself and becoming quality, challenging TV.

I've not watched it for best part of a decade, but can this possibly be true?!


Have the makers been watching the Wire and asking themselves? Why can't we do politics and issues?


It's a question, does anyone watch it?

Indeed, SMG - season three did end with a massive crash, but it didn't feel falsely rushed. If anything it was good because there had been a slow build up of everything, and like the towers that were blown up at the beginning of the series, it is quicker for something to fall.


It also had, and again trying not to be too spoilerish, some intelligent things to say about the drugs trade. It is ugly, it does destroy lives, but it's here and it's all about how best we deal with it with what we've got, rather than what we wish we had. The parallels with the Iraq war were brilliantly made ("We are police, not soldiers").


I got so angry when the press got on the story about the zones ... but I liked the way the politicians actually did try and grapple with the issue rather than just go all knee-jerk.


And a few one-off things: Method Man as Cheese, the road trip chasing the phones, the guy reading porn in the stock room - and loads of other stuff.

The scene in the bar? Oh yes! Any other show would have had an episode or so dealing with it to get more mileage from the plot, but the great thing about the Wire is that it is happy to leave it to the audience's imagination.


Steve Earle was Waylon! I totally missed that ... though TBH I wouldn't recognise hos anyways. He does the theme tune for season five, it says ... Cracking stuff.


Speaking of, there are now two soundtrack albums out ... gonna get them and if anyone wants a copy, they'd be welcome.

I'm still way back on series 1, and really really enjoying it. Still, I have to say that I think you're all getting carried away. It is just a TV series, and whilst it is ooozing quality, it is still just a TV series, and I want to know how you guys are so sure it's so real? Are you FEDS, or dealers, or corrupt business men? I've seen all the same poolease stuff in other films and shows.


Like I say, I am really enjoying it, and it stands out as very good, but for me, from what I've seen so far, it's in no way superior to The Sopranos and 1 or 2 other series that have stood out.


It does however spunk on the likes of CSI and all that sh!te, the popularity of which I have never gotten my head around!

I you look at my early posts Keef, you'll se I agree; it's different to the Sopranos and they're both hugely entertaining in their own way.

The Wire has been very well researched. The writers spent a lot of time with the Baltimore police Dep't who apparently worship this programme as the only one who really tells it like it is.

There is a fair bit of police politics in series 1, but it's ramped up hugely in subsequent series.


Also it has an integrity of vision and breadth of scope i've not seen in any other long runner.

Band of Brothers could easily be compared in terms of integrity and quality, but much easier to do that in 8 episodes than it is across 5 series.


I love Heroes too, and though it's excellent at what it's doing, it's basically Rentaghost with megabucks thrown at it. Has anyone seen Jack Coleman and Harold Meaker in the same room together...anyone?

Never got in to Heros simply because I couldn't work out where I was as it was shown about 5 times a week at different times on different channels. I used to be in to Buffy and Angel though, so I'm not above anything!


Like a say, Wire is obviously class, and I know you liked a bit of Sopranos. Just find this thread quite funny, as I've never seen grown men (Sean) salivate over a TV programme in quite the same way before ;-)

Why is The Wire the best TV show? Because, like I said earlier, the characters in it feel real, they're not just mouthpieces for a plot. The show does not trick audiences by hiding facts or having people do things out of character, just to get something going. Think how many shows just involve people saying things in a way that people would never talk in real life, just so they can get the next "clue" or whatever ...


And the world that The Wire maps out is unparalleled in television series. Again, how many shows are just a handful of locations or sets and nothing else. In The Wire, Baltimore is a character in itself and we are constantly seeing it from new angles. And not just in a physical sense either: in the show we see people just hanging out, doing ordinary stuff, things that don't add to anything in terms of moving a story along a line to a specific destination, but instead build a rounded and complex picture. Just like real life.

David Simon speaks for himself:


http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguide/tvradio/story/0,,2008531,00.html


Unlike, say, the CSI franchise, where unequivocally good and good-looking men and women swan around swish offices, and viewers are accustomed to the crime lab delivering perpetrators neatly at the end of each episode, The Wire offers no such comforts. Here the cops are, for the most part, a bunch of aggressive, workshy drunks who inhabit a filthy basement so appallingly ill-equipped they barely have a computer between them. And the cops are of course pitted against the crooks, but since we spend as much time in the company of the latter as we do the former, our sympathies are forever being tested to breaking point.


"That's the problem with most cop shows," explains David Simon. "It's the black hat, white hat thing. I swear if I had to write a police procedural right now, I'd put a gun to my head. On shows where only the arrest matters, where it's about good and evil, punishing crime, the poor and the rich, the suspect exists to exalt the good guys, to make the Sipowiczes [the no-nonsense cop in NYPD Blue] and the Pembletons [the no-nonsense cop in Homicide - Life On The Streets] and the Joe Fridays [the no-nonsense cop in the protoypical Dragnet] that much more moral, that much more righteous, that much more intellectualised. It's to validate their point of view and the point of view of society. So, you end up with same stilted picture of the underclass. Either they're the salt of earth looking for a break, and not at all responsible, or they're dangerous and evil and need to be punished. That's a good precedent for creating an alienated America. Dramatically I have no interest in good versus evil. I am interested in institutions, and how they seek to preserve themselves even as they are crumbling."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...