Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it's a reinforcement of the world she lives and works in.


But still someone answer the question...just what would qualify someone to judge music if, being head of a succesful music publishing company, being in one of the UK's most successful girl bands, having been a sucessful manager for several sucessful acts, and having worked in the music and tv industry since the age of doesn't qualify a person!

It's not judging music though is it? That's for A&R men, who make real decisions. This is PR - for the telly.


The 'music judging' comprises less than ten stock scripted lines.


This year's faves are:


"By any standards, that was world class"

"I just didn't get it"

"You're pitching was a bit off" ('Pitching..?!' wtf?)

"I don't think you get enough appreciation"

"You're a tryer"


("Nailed it" has, of course, been banned following overuse last series)

It was metaphorical waynetta, and in irony to his comment that he'd shag both of them (Cheryl and Dannii) and that's all they're good for. He deserves whatever anyone says in response to that - he brings it on himself, whereas the non consenting sujects of the photos you posted as 'mingers' didn't deserve the humiliation they might have felt at your use of their images in your 'mingers' thread.


It's not a like for like analogy I'm afraid.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bob, you might know something about this... how

> much do you think Cowell makes from ITV for the

> show itself, and how does that compare to the

> revenue from record sales?


Revenue from record sales?


Oh yeah.. that latter half of the 20th century phenomenon. I remember now.

felt-tip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DJKQ - every last tiny bit of that programme is

> scripted.



if that's the case then they need new scriptwriters - every week is the same...

"You look like a popstar, you sound like a popstar.."

"You absolutely nailed it"

"You made that song your own"

"You're out of your comfort zone"

"You gave me goosebumps"


ENOUGH ALREADY!


(Paije to win!!)

waynetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, especially considering he knows pretty much

> f**k all about music and he's made his wealth from

> judging musical ability on a talent contest.

> You gotta hand it to the man.


Actually, he made a lot of his wealth in the music business before the X-Factor/Pop Idol shows started. The talent shows just allowed him to multiply his wealth and his profile quite considerably.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...