Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Anyone got a link? I had a mooch on the site but

> couldn't find anything


guys there is nothing in the Torygraph magazine apart from the usual interesting recipes and wine reviews, over-priced 'fashion', interior design and this weekend, an article on 'Big hair, small egos' and the confessions of a monkey smuggler ....


hope russ is having a great 'holiday' eh?

>guys there is nothing in the Torygraph magazine apart from the usual interesting recipes and wine reviews, over-priced >'fashion', interior design and this weekend, an article on 'Big hair, small egos' and the confessions of a monkey smuggler >....


Is the naked woman emerging from the sleeping bag on page 16 of Seven definitely airbrushed? Looks like it to me from the thumbnail, even without my magnifying glass. http://dailytelegraph.newspaperdirect.com/screenprint/viewer.aspx

Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....


What did people really think about the article on page 56?


I mean, were you surprised that X, Y and Z got a mention or were you expecting it to be more like A, B and C ...?


* yours interestedly *


Katie


(yours discalculia-ly)

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....

>

> What did people really think about the article on

> page 56?

>

> I mean, were you surprised that X, Y and Z got a

> mention or were you expecting it to be more like

> A, B and C ...?

>

> * yours interestedly *

>

> Katie

>

> (yours discalculia-ly)

__________________________________________________


Actually..



I'd have expected W(**F) X Y & Z



Wouldn't you ?


( i'm so over it now though )



* checks mirror *


" Hold on "



W**F

I bought a copy of the Sunday telegraph at Terminal 5 yesterday, went right the way through the magazines and papers whilst waiting. Nothing, nada, nicht. I texted a friend on here later to see if they had found anything, same result. Unless of course there is a smarte ar$e out there that has found it.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....

>

> What did people really think about the article on

> page 56?



I'm confused now. Was there really some article or was it all bullshit?

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....

> >

> > What did people really think about the article

> on

> > page 56?

>

>

> I'm confused now. Was there really some article or

> was it all bullshit?


oops sorry B, it was all bull (including my post, there's no page 56) :-$

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok, well, I'm now back, a little jet lagged which is why I am posting at a slightly strange hour, but to cut to the chase, the article wasn't published as you all found out when you looked for it (thank you for being interested enough to actually look for it though).


Shortly after I'd set off on my vacation I got a call from my editor saying that the piece wasn't going to be included as originally intended due to another feature becoming more extensive than originally anticipated.


But the good news is that it will now be published in next Sunday's paper! I won't be away that weekend so look forward to discussing it with you lot on the day or soon after.


Sorry for the anti-climax! I know some people were looking forward to reading it. But you don't have to wait much longer now!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was something to do a with a gate in the Brockwell case, I can't recall the detail, but the council removed a gate, which had been gifted in trust to the park, so the festival builders could allow access, or something. And that was illegal and that's what enabled Rylance et al to litigate. 
    • How long is the Gala, and potential new event, disruption….this could be key from the article on the High Court challenge against Lambeth…   Under permitted development rules, a temporary change of use is allowed for a total of 28 days each calendar year, but the Brockwell Park festivals run over 37 days and were due to begin on 23 May.
    • Try the castle upstairs, you'd need to buy a few drinks in return.  @Suecan you advise?  It will be in use some Mondays no doubt
    • Yes, I was bemused to see that notice in Barry Road. It seemed a strange place to be having a drop off point.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...