Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The big ones were "F**k Forveer" with Babyshambles and "Can't stand me now" with the Libertines. But I know what you talking about, I think i'll try and get busted with Crack and heroin and then claim the Doherty Defence "but officer he gets away with it why are we so different?" and see if that works. But I don't think so somehow.

John Lennon liked his heroin too. And Hendrix.


I'm sure Doherty didn't invite all the media coverage of his sordid little life. He was a terrible mess long before he became tabloid fodder. It was the fact that he started seeing Kate Moss that made him such a fixture of the gossip columns. Blame the media for force-feeding his every move down our throats.

i agree about the press but it's not the press that stops judges from doing their jobs. the situation is just sending out such bad messages, do heroin to the point where you don't care if you're found with it on you, plus all else, and then get off countless times.


didn't goerge michael do community service for a bit of gear and boy george go to prison and do community service in the states?


now is the thread going to be hijacked by bad jokes on george micheal's arrest in thoe LA loos ...

I thought Doherty was more of a crack man.


Tha main thing he did wrong was to believe he was a major figure when he's only an f list celebrity.

Old rock and roll stars were larger than life and their careers were larger than life. Doherty was in a band with one good album, they had promise but weren't even particulalry famous. and then he went out with a famous chav from croydon...woopeedoo.


If he were to be sent down for the many years he deserves or gets himself killed i don't think I'd even miss a stride.

I just resent him appearing in proper newspapers.

capt_birdseye Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> John Lennon liked his heroin too. And Hendrix.


Yep and they were both gob shites! Lennon wrote great songs, but was basically a tw@t, who probably would have gone on to write more crap than he'd written good stuff like his writing partner has done.


Hendrix was great for doing something different, but really wasn't that special, and those who put him at number 1 guitarist of all time are crazy! Anyway, he was an idiot who choked on his own vomit, serves him right, maybe it'll happen to Doherty and we can all forget about him....


Note: I realise that what I have just said will probably earn me a proper slating, but I don't care. I hate over rated musicians who are liked because people are told they're good and ought to be liked.

Keef, you have reason, as they say in spain.

The difference being that many years down the road we're still talking about them, I can't see us talking about doherty in 25 years time, even if someone does us all a favour and does a Mark Chapman.


As Dan le Sac said

"The Beatles were just a band.

Led Zeppelin , just a band.

The Beach Boys , just a band..

The Sex Pistols , just a band.

The Clash , just a band.

Crass , just a band.

Minor Threat , just a band.

The Cure , just a band.

The Smiths , just a band.

Nirvana , just a band.

The Pixies, just a band.

Oasis , just a band.

Radiohead , just a band.

Bloc Party , just a band.

The Arctic Monkeys, just a band.

"The next big thing", just a band."

Surely Guns N's Roses should be in that list ;-)


Jah, when it comes to Hendrix I'm always torn... Like I say, he did something different which was great, and he had some top tunes (Little Wing and Hey Joe being 2 of my favourites), but just don't think he was the genius everyone made him out to be... Plus he played a strat and it was upsidedown, fool ;-)

Bloody hell I turn my back and they start blaspheming. I?ll not have it I tell you!


Hendrix could play as quickly and technically as any of his contemporaries most notably Eric Clapton. The thing was he did it with his own very unique style and touch of flare which is what made him great.


I have always wondered about that guitar of his though. It must have been made by the same guy as that Citroen I rented in France that had the steering wheel on the wrong side.

Hendrix - amazing guitarist, if you like that kind of thing. All but around 6 of his songs are dull as ditchwater though. And those 6 include a couple of cover versions!


Lennon - yeah was probably a gob-shite - but what has that really got to do with Lennon the musician? You really can't argue with his body of work. Fair enough, it was all down-hill after "Imagine", but you have to admit he'd set himself a pretty high bar. McCartney too, comes across as a complete eejit, but I can still forgive him Mull of Kintyre and Frog Chorus because of his Beatles output.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...