Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone had any experience with owning a leasehold property of which Southwark Council is the freeholder, but not in a council housing situation? I'm on the verge of putting an offer on a flat in ED which is in this situation and, being a cautious first time buyer, I wondered whether this was something that was likely to throw up issues during the conveyancing process or in the future (or, conversely, might be a good thing). Any thoughts or experiences would be very welcome.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12762-southwark-council-as-freeholder/
Share on other sites

Hi,


Southwark are our freeholders. We didn't have any problems in the conveyancing process but we've got some repairs that they, as freeholders, are liable to carry out and it's an absolute nightmare trying to get them to do anything about it.


There are pluses in terms of having a large public body with elected representatives as the freeholder as at least there is someone you can get hold of to complain to etc and there are elected bodies, such as the Home Owners Council, to represent the views of leaseholders to the council. In my opinion, this is better than an absentee landlord who lives in another country who you can't get in touch with when something goes wrong.


However, Southwark Council is a massive bureaucracy - so you've got that to contend with if you want to get anything done - and they're also in a large amount of debt and massively behind with their housing stock renovation programme (about 10 years behind is the last I heard) so I don't think leaseholders are high on their priority list in terms of repairs etc. Hence our situation.


My advice would be, try and find a flat where you own a share of the freehold. It may be more expensive but at least you're in control!

werdna101 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> My advice would be, try and find a flat where you

> own a share of the freehold. It may be more

> expensive but at least you're in control!


Good advice if the other leaseholders are willing or able to share responsibility/cost of any repairs. A nightmare if they're not! If the flat (and the common parts e.g. roof) you're buying is in a good enough condition to survive the next ten years with no repair full employment with good salaries. (Be very careful of the retired on low incomes- they'll tug at your heart strings while you pay all the bills)

I can only second werdna101's opinion. We have a problem with our roof and it looks most likely that the council will not pay for it. The reason behind this is a clause called 'major works surcharge' which indicates that they may charge you for any repairs up to 10000 pounds.You can apply for an interest free loan, but given the bureaucracy involved it could take very long, not good if you need an emergency repair.


Check your contract, have a complete survery of the property done and then make your decision.


Good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...