Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why is it that the government prints out a nice glossy brochure and posts it to every new parent showing them how to fit a car seat properly, but for this piece of information you have to either read the Mail or access the Revenue's website?


Just saying the information 'is available' doesn't mean it gets there. And the ones who don't get it are probably the ones who really need to.

while i do agree that the information is out there (has anyone looked at the finance act 2006 for a bit of light reading? - apparently it changed trust law which offered a loop hold for IHT) would anyone disagree with the fact that the richer you are the more likely it is you can "buy" the required advice to avoid IHT?


We can all visit a number of websites which may give us an insight into how we can avoid this tax but unless you do it for a living, you probably are not going to know what is the most efficent way of avoiding IHT for your personal circumstance. I agree with *Bob* the people who could really do with legitimately avoiding this tax are hardly in a position to pay for the advice they need.


And while i dont disagree with paying taxes to run the country i live in, it would be nice, just for once for someone to show me that the money i pay in taxes is actually doing some good for this country....ok, that another thread altogether...

That would prevent IHT assuming they lived for 7 years after they gave you it but they have to pay a fair market rent to avoid it being classed as a 'gift with reservation of benefit' and then you have to pay income tax on that rent.


I doubt they'd go for it.


You should at least set up their wills so that when one of them dies they give their half to you and then when the next one dies you get the second half. Without a will it will automatically pass between spouses so the last one to go will leave you the whole house with only one nil band.


The other way you make full use of both their allowances. (ie only pay tax on amount over ?600k rather than amount over ?300k)


It's worth getting a solicitor involved as it will only cost you a couple of grand and could save thousands.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...