Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why is it that the government prints out a nice glossy brochure and posts it to every new parent showing them how to fit a car seat properly, but for this piece of information you have to either read the Mail or access the Revenue's website?


Just saying the information 'is available' doesn't mean it gets there. And the ones who don't get it are probably the ones who really need to.

while i do agree that the information is out there (has anyone looked at the finance act 2006 for a bit of light reading? - apparently it changed trust law which offered a loop hold for IHT) would anyone disagree with the fact that the richer you are the more likely it is you can "buy" the required advice to avoid IHT?


We can all visit a number of websites which may give us an insight into how we can avoid this tax but unless you do it for a living, you probably are not going to know what is the most efficent way of avoiding IHT for your personal circumstance. I agree with *Bob* the people who could really do with legitimately avoiding this tax are hardly in a position to pay for the advice they need.


And while i dont disagree with paying taxes to run the country i live in, it would be nice, just for once for someone to show me that the money i pay in taxes is actually doing some good for this country....ok, that another thread altogether...

That would prevent IHT assuming they lived for 7 years after they gave you it but they have to pay a fair market rent to avoid it being classed as a 'gift with reservation of benefit' and then you have to pay income tax on that rent.


I doubt they'd go for it.


You should at least set up their wills so that when one of them dies they give their half to you and then when the next one dies you get the second half. Without a will it will automatically pass between spouses so the last one to go will leave you the whole house with only one nil band.


The other way you make full use of both their allowances. (ie only pay tax on amount over ?600k rather than amount over ?300k)


It's worth getting a solicitor involved as it will only cost you a couple of grand and could save thousands.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Seems a pretty dangerous position to me - apart from getting in the way of pedestrians trying to cross the road large vehicles heading south have to edge into the oncoming traffic lane to get past. I've got a normal-sized car and had to squeeze through a gap the other day.  
    • When a car is left damaged by the road-side it may be that the insurer is tasked with recovering the vehicle to assess it and (possibly) take it for repair. Only if it is in a dangerous position will the police recover it - which saves money for the tax-payer.  You may also have some recovery options with e.g. the AA (other organisations are available). Were the car to have been stolen or abandoned then it will take some time to sort this out, and again unless the vehicle is in a dangerous position the police won't be rushing to deal with that. Not sure who the 'they' are in this case.
    • I wouldn't like to speculate, Sue. Not my thing. Teddy Boy is your man on the ground for that sort of first-hand detail. It's six points for driving without insurance and six points for using a phone, so that's an automatic ban of at least six months. They're going to be practically uninsurable for a considerable period after that. So, nobody's hurt, a clearly crap driver is off the road for some time and the good burghers of SE22 get a lovely, shiny new post - probably paid for by the driver. Every cloud, and that. If only Franklins wasn't changing hands, Lordship Lane would be almost perfect.
    • Was the driver still with it when the police arrived?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...