Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm fed up with buses suddenly, mid-journey, announcing the bus will terminate before the destination displayed on the front. Camberwell seems to be the main culprit.


I understand the drivers may have completed their shifts before their final destination because of traffic problems.


However, if you catch the number 40 from Aldgate after 11pm, or on route at London Bridge etc, and it states Dulwich Plough, to announce the destination is changing puts women in particular at such a late hour in potential danger.


I was again, I couldn't put a number on the amount of times, kicked off at Camberwell last night around 12.30am despite boarding the bus supposedly for Dulwich Plough. At Camberwell I received unwelcome attention from a few well-oiled lotharios declaring their affections with can in hand (they haven't seen me first thing in the morning!)


If I board a bus with a display announcing it is terminating at Dulwich Plough I expect it to follow that route, not arbitrarily terminate beforehand.


Bus companies owe passengers a duty of care.


Sort out your schedules

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/126497-bus-companies-and-duty-of-care/
Share on other sites

Write to TfL who are responsible for bus franchising in London


Write to your MP and ask them to write to the Transport Secretary as government was repsonsible for the privitisation of bus services.


More that do it the more likely things will change


Could be worse, could be Southern....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...